Well, that was awkward!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Reba said:
Obama could have at least said something, being such a full disclosure kind of guy. He doesn't hold back from any other opportunities to blame Bush, so why would he refrain from disclosing any supposed lies?
Click to expand...

First, give just one example where he blamed Bush. Just one. You will not be able to do it.

And second, what makes you think AIPAC doesn't have him in their gunsights in case he does? :hmm:
 
jillio said:
What person caught with their pants down (male or female) doesn't say, "I didn't do it!":lol:
Click to expand...

Especially if their wife or hubby is watching in the room or watching you on TV.
 
Beowulf said:
First, give just one example where he blamed Bush. Just one. You will not be able to do it.
Click to expand...
The economy.

And second, what makes you think AIPAC doesn't have him in their gunsights in case he does? :hmm:
Click to expand...
Are you saying that Obama is afraid to say anything?
 
Beowulf said:
I agree, he didn't point his finger in every American's face.
He was dragged to a chamber of inquisitional questioning over a little hanky panky. That is an affront to red-blooded Americans. :cool2:
Click to expand...

I didn't think the punishment fit the crime. Censure would have been a much more suitable punishment.
 
jillio said:
Obama has been more disclosing than anyone prior. He is simply put in the position of having to take these matters slowly. Cleaning up another politician's mess.
Click to expand...

Which is what Bush was doing with Clinton's MESS.
 
Reba said:
The economy.


Are you saying that Obama is afraid to say anything?
Click to expand...

That isn't blame. That is honest and factual attribution of responsibility. How could Obama be responsible for that which occurred prior to his taking office?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top