Well, that was awkward!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Was that a legal option for Congress?

Well only Was that a legal option for Congress?[/quote]

Well only nine people have been censured for improper behavior. "]nine senators
have been censured for improper behavior in this country's history. None of them had to do with personal relationships outside the marriage. The reasons range from fighting in the Senate to abuse of power like converting campaign funds for personal use. If the Senate can censure senators, I see no reason why they can't censure the President.
 
Well only nine senators have been censured for improper behavior in this country's history. None of them had to do with personal relationships outside the marriage. The reasons range from fighting in the Senate to abuse of power like converting campaign funds for personal use. If the Senate can censure senators, I see no reason why they can't censure the President.

I want to make a small correction, it's fifteen members not nine.
 
What exactly is your point?

That you are complaining about Obama having to clean up Bush's mess and you are silent on Bush having to clean up Clinton's mess.
Like I said......You fight but you do not fight fair.
 
That you are complaining about Obama having to clean up Bush's mess and you are silent on Bush having to clean up Clinton's mess.
Like I said......You fight but you do not fight fair.

That's because Clinton wasn't a part of the discussion. Every President has to clean up what was left from the previous administration. Duh.
 
That's because Clinton wasn't a part of the discussion. Every President has to clean up what was left from the previous administration. Duh.

Except Bush. He took a surplus and managed to cripple this country economically.
 
What was the original topic?:dizzy:
 
He has too much grace to be that obviously petty.:cool2:
But if Obama believes that Bush lied about something that important, shouldn't it be "disclosed?" What is more important, graciousness or soldiers' lives?

I believe Obama doesn't say anything because he knows that Bush didn't lie.
 
But if Obama believes that Bush lied about something that important, shouldn't it be "disclosed?" What is more important, graciousness or soldiers' lives?

I believe Obama doesn't say anything because he knows that Bush didn't lie.

I agree. Otherwise O' would be dishonest about his charges against Bush if he is unable to prove otherwise. He's right there in the White House, information at his disposal.
 
But if Obama believes that Bush lied about something that important, shouldn't it be "disclosed?" What is more important, graciousness or soldiers' lives?

I believe Obama doesn't say anything because he knows that Bush didn't lie.


how do you know research find obama never tell confess truth
No sense I beleive he mixing on manipulate and not honest truth! politc not promise! I assurance my opinion!
 
But if Obama believes that Bush lied about something that important, shouldn't it be "disclosed?" What is more important, graciousness or soldiers' lives?

I believe Obama doesn't say anything because he knows that Bush didn't lie.

It was already disclosed. Americans aren't so stupid as to have to be told by a President that which is already obvious.
 
I agree. Otherwise O' would be dishonest about his charges against Bush if he is unable to prove otherwise. He's right there in the White House, information at his disposal.

What charges?
 
I agree. Otherwise O' would be dishonest about his charges against Bush if he is unable to prove otherwise. He's right there in the White House, information at his disposal.
I'm sure Obama has better things to do than prove or disprove anything about Bush.

Bush is so ........... yesterday. Yeah, that's it. Sorry to break it to you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top