Well, that was awkward!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Beowulf said:
And what was the "crime?"
Click to expand...

Don't you read!!!!! Lying under oath. That is the crime. He admitted it!
But when he did, he did not point his finger in every Americans face.
 
jillio said:
Who the heck are you to decide what is acceptable for an American to say? Last I checked, we still had freedom of speech in America. :roll:
Click to expand...

We do....and the right applys to NON-americans too!
 
rolling7 said:
Yes, I would and I would also object to any C.E.O. of XYZ Company doing it.
These folks are not there for their ego, they have a wide responsibility and need to set an example.
Click to expand...

:hmm:

Putting one's feet up on a desk is a sign of ego? What if a CEO who owns the company puts his feet up on his desk?
 
rolling7 said:
Don't you read!!!!! Lying under oath. That is the crime. He admitted it!
But when he did, he did not point his finger in every Americans face.
Click to expand...

I agree, he didn't point his finger in every American's face.
He was dragged to a chamber of inquisitional questioning over a little hanky panky. That is an affront to red-blooded Americans. :cool2:
 
rolling7 said:
Don't you read!!!!! Lying under oath. That is the crime. He admitted it!
But when he did, he did not point his finger in every Americans face.
Click to expand...

Oh, puh-leeze! Dude, if you are as judgemental IRL as you are on this forum, it is no wonder no one has been to your home in years.:P
 
Beowulf said:
When Clinton lied, nobody died. When Bush did, millions died.
Click to expand...
If you believe that, then you must believe that Obama is perpetuating a lie, and more have continued to die.
 
Beowulf said:
I agree, he didn't point his finger in every American's face.
He was dragged to a chamber of inquisitional questioning over a little hanky panky. That is an affront to red-blooded Americans. :cool2:
Click to expand...

What person caught with their pants down (male or female) doesn't say, "I didn't do it!":lol:
 
Reba said:
If you believe that, then you must believe that Obama is perpetuating a lie, and more have continued to die.
Click to expand...

Obama has been more disclosing than anyone prior. He is simply put in the position of having to take these matters slowly. Cleaning up another politician's mess.
 
Reba said:
If you believe that, then you must believe that Obama is perpetuating a lie, and more have continued to die.
Click to expand...

Unfortunately Obama cannot undo the damage that Bush has done for two terms in one shot. Give Obama time, and plenty of it, since Bush did a helluva lot of damage.
 
jillio said:
Obama has been more disclosing than anyone prior. He is simply put in the position of having to take these matters slowly. Cleaning up another politician's mess.
Click to expand...
Has he disclosed that the war is a result of lying by Bush?

No? Then he can continue the war because he (Obama) deems it not a lie.

If the answer was yes, then Obama would have said so. He would have withdrawn the troops immediately.

Didn't happen.

Obama never disclosed any "lies" by former President Bush.

So, either Bush didn't lie, or Obama is part of the duplicity.

Which is it?
 
Beowulf said:
Unfortunately Obama cannot undo the damage that Bush has done for two terms in one shot. Give Obama time, and plenty of it, since Bush did a helluva lot of damage.
Click to expand...
Obama could have at least said something, being such a full disclosure kind of guy. He doesn't hold back from any other opportunities to blame Bush, so why would he refrain from disclosing any supposed lies?
 
Reba said:
Has he disclosed that the war is a result of lying by Bush?

He didn't need to. We figured that one out all on our own.

No? Then he can continue the war because he (Obama) deems it not a lie.

What?

If the answer was yes, then Obama would have said so. He would have withdrawn the troops immediately.

No. Withdrawing the troops immediately, after all of the destruction already created by Bush's lies, would have done more harm than good. It takes time and careful consideration to repair the damage done by the likes of Bush.
Didn't happen.

Obama never disclosed any "lies" by former President Bush.

So, either Bush didn't lie, or Obama is part of the duplicity.

Which is it?
Click to expand...

Bush lied, Obama is attempting to honestly repair the damage done by those lies.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top