Do I decided a myth would serve a better explanation ? The answer is no, because I believe there's God and I do believe in Him.
But you have not proven the existence of God. The Bible and many myths share similiar interests. It's just a belief with no substance at all.
I guess, you have a problem with " believin' "/ " faith " because, you doubt since you want Him to prove to you in your own eyes to SEE somethin' before you could believe Him.
Intellectually, I find the Bible to be works of ignorant authors, not divinely inspired. My father was a Christian minister. I was a Christian when I was a teenager. I was a religious freak like you. Now I am happy to be free from religious supersitition.
Why it is necessary to SEE somethin' as a proof before you'd believe Him ?
I don't have to see. For example, I cannot see bacteria but I know it exists based on evidence. The Bible offers no evidence of its divinity whatsoever. I don't want to put my faith in something that's unscientific and absurd.
I have already SEEN Him, because of things around me ... I can SEE the trees, the sky, the mountains, and everythin'. That means He is there !
You know, when I look at the marvels of nature (trees, skies, mountains, etc), I often think, "How could Christians be so foolish not to see evolution at work?" There are mysteries but I don't put God in it.