Texas inmate, 67, set for execution in slayings 31 years ago

Whites make their "demands"...and if they don't get them, resort to threats!...That's their tactic....

Hispanics make their "demands"...and if they don't get them, resort to threats!...That's their tactic....

Asians make their "demands"...and if they don't get them, resort to threats!...That's their tactic....

Whoever make their "demands"...and if they don't get them, resort to threats!...That's their tactic....

RR, be careful what you say...
 
Crazypaul, Jiro, and those who strongly believes in execution and thinks we have high technology to prove in forensic science.

This link shows flaws in justice system and might surprise you.

http://www.innocenceproject.org/

This is real organization that helps exonerate many inmates, and discovered many of those real perpetrators still on street while innocent sitting in jail.

The Innocence Project uses the same "high technology" and DNA science to exonerate people that prosecutors use to convict people.

"The Innocence Project was founded in 1992 by Barry C. Scheck and Peter J. Neufeld at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University to assist prisoners who could be proven innocent through DNA testing. To date, more than 300 people in the United States have been exonerated by DNA testing, including 18 who served time on death row. These people served an average of 14 years in prison before exoneration and release."
 
Glad these 18 innocents made it before their final execution date, if they didn't make it which would be major blow to the justice system.

The Innocence Project uses the same "high technology" and DNA science to exonerate people that prosecutors use to convict people.

"The Innocence Project was founded in 1992 by Barry C. Scheck and Peter J. Neufeld at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University to assist prisoners who could be proven innocent through DNA testing. To date, more than 300 people in the United States have been exonerated by DNA testing, including 18 who served time on death row. These people served an average of 14 years in prison before exoneration and release."
 
You still miss my point, my point is all about the system being FLAWED, in other word it is NOT perfect system, why kill somebody when the system isn't perfect yet?

That why we have appeal process.
 
You still miss my point, my point is all about the system being FLAWED, in other word it is NOT perfect system, why kill somebody when the system isn't perfect yet?

Well, that's how criminal justice system works.

No matter if you don't like and you will say different if someone murder one of your family.

Victim families do emotion a lot for rest of their life.
 
he gave his life up 30years ago.HE had 30odd years of missing the joys of life never holding women hand or cradle baby eat what he like go where he wanted to..instead banged up with apprehension each day....he been well punished.It going to put all the families through dreadful torcher
 
That article is about the dirty DA who got money not to arrest the criminal. That's a big different story.

You were talking about convicting innocent people. Do they still convict innocent people today in murder cases? Prove it!

Do you think its easy to prove? Your phynny!

You see, DA is a crook, why trust him in past when it comes to death penalty?

I trust NO DAMN person in justice system when it comes to convict somebody.

Guess your too retarded to understand.
 
That article is about the dirty DA who got money not to arrest the criminal. That's a big different story.

You were talking about convicting innocent people. Do they still convict innocent people today in murder cases? Prove it!

As a matter of fact....I know of three people who have gone to jail...and they were completely innocent....I know they were innocent without any question. ...yet they were forced to confess under threat of worse. ... now if by chance you think this doesn't happen today ... I feel sorry for you... this happens all too often, because cops do not want the truth, they just want to close a case....the rest of the system is the same....but here is a bit of light reading for ya ...


https://news.vice.com/article/why-are-there-up-to-120000-innocent-people-in-us-prisons

Sent from my SGH-T399N using AllDeaf App mobile app
 
As a matter of fact....I know of three people who have gone to jail...and they were completely innocent....I know they were innocent without any question. ...yet they were forced to confess under threat of worse. ... now if by chance you think this doesn't happen today ... I feel sorry for you... this happens all too often, because cops do not want the truth, they just want to close a case....the rest of the system is the same....but here is a bit of light reading for ya ...


https://news.vice.com/article/why-are-there-up-to-120000-innocent-people-in-us-prisons
LOL, it was not. Too much exaggerating. Are you telling me that today some innocent people go to jail for rape or murder without evidence?
 
LOL, it was not. Too much exaggerating. Are you telling me that today some innocent people go to jail for rape or murder without evidence?

Ever read a book called Criminal Evidence? Give it a go, and you may find yourself a bit shocked at how little "evidence" is actually needed....and yes that goes for rape and murder as well...
As for exaggerating...I have no clue what you mean...I just stated it as it was...

Sent from my SGH-T399N using AllDeaf App mobile app
 
Ever read a book called Criminal Evidence? Give it a go, and you may find yourself a bit shocked at how little "evidence" is actually needed....and yes that goes for rape and murder as well...
As for exaggerating...I have no clue what you mean...I just stated it as it was...

Sent from my SGH-T399N using AllDeaf App mobile app
That website you linked me to is exaggerating.

It even posts a link itself. Street gangs have a great solution for reducing violent crime. Read more here.

It's not true at all.
 
That website you linked me to is exaggerating.

It even posts a link itself. Street gangs have a great solution for reducing violent crime. Read more here.

It's not true at all.

Anyone can nitpick a point but actually read various sources and open your mind a bit....
These a quick seaches...something easily done and you can find a lot of different view points...as the saying goes for ever expert side A finds, side B can find two, and vice versa. ....
Try another.... just incase you don't want to read all of it...it has a interesting point it makes...
....
It hits you in the gut. You first think about this particular person, this man who lost his family, who spent decades in some awful cell believing he was going to be electrocuted. And then you think that other frightening thought, the bugaboo lurking behind all exoneration stories: How many other Glenn Fords are still behind bars? How many will die there? Just how often does our venerated justice system fail?

Rarely, at least according to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. In a 2006 opinion he*cited an approximate error rate*of*0.027 percent, based on back-of-the-envelope*calculations*by an Oregon district attorney in a fiery op-ed for the*New York Times. The op-ed was in response to a report by*Samuel Gross, a law professor at the University of Michigan, cataloguing 340 exonerations between 1989 and 2003. “Let’s give the professor the benefit of the doubt,” the op-ed read. “Let’s assume that he understated the number of innocents by roughly a factor of 10, that instead of 340 there were 4,000 people in prison who weren’t involved in the crime in any way. During that same 15 years, there were more than 15 million felony convictions across the country. That would make the error rate .027 percent — or, to put it another way, a success rate of 99.973 percent.”

But*that*claim, Gross writes in today’s issue of the*Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesHere’s the problem with its logic. The known exonerations were almost all murder and rape cases, which get much more post-conviction attention, whereas the total number of felonies also includes burglary, car theft, tax fraud, and drug possession. Some 95 percent of felony convictions are the result of plea bargains, with no formal evidence ever presented, and most never bother with an appeal...

Paragraphs 3-5
http://phenomena.nationalgeographic...re-wrongly-convicted-researchers-do-the-math/



Sent from my SGH-T399N using AllDeaf App mobile app
 
If we can't trust eye witness testimony, ballistics, forensics, confessions, autopsies, audio and video recordings, etc., how can we get convictions of people who steal, rape, assault and kill?
 
Anyone can nitpick a point but actually read various sources and open your mind a bit....
These a quick seaches...something easily done and you can find a lot of different view points...as the saying goes for ever expert side A finds, side B can find two, and vice versa. ....
Try another.... just incase you don't want to read all of it...it has a interesting point it makes...
....
It hits you in the gut. You first think about this particular person, this man who lost his family, who spent decades in some awful cell believing he was going to be electrocuted. And then you think that other frightening thought, the bugaboo lurking behind all exoneration stories: How many other Glenn Fords are still behind bars? How many will die there? Just how often does our venerated justice system fail?

Rarely, at least according to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. In a 2006 opinion he*cited an approximate error rate*of*0.027 percent, based on back-of-the-envelope*calculations*by an Oregon district attorney in a fiery op-ed for the*New York Times. The op-ed was in response to a report by*Samuel Gross, a law professor at the University of Michigan, cataloguing 340 exonerations between 1989 and 2003. “Let’s give the professor the benefit of the doubt,” the op-ed read. “Let’s assume that he understated the number of innocents by roughly a factor of 10, that instead of 340 there were 4,000 people in prison who weren’t involved in the crime in any way. During that same 15 years, there were more than 15 million felony convictions across the country. That would make the error rate .027 percent — or, to put it another way, a success rate of 99.973 percent.”

But*that*claim, Gross writes in today’s issue of the*Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesHere’s the problem with its logic. The known exonerations were almost all murder and rape cases, which get much more post-conviction attention, whereas the total number of felonies also includes burglary, car theft, tax fraud, and drug possession. Some 95 percent of felony convictions are the result of plea bargains, with no formal evidence ever presented, and most never bother with an appeal...

Paragraphs 3-5
http://phenomena.nationalgeographic...re-wrongly-convicted-researchers-do-the-math/



Sent from my SGH-T399N using AllDeaf App mobile app
Oh damn, another homework for me? LOL...anyway
That would make the error rate .027 percent — or, to put it another way, a success rate of 99.973 percent.
I get it. The error rate should be ZERO. Oh well, for example, many people believe that Casey Anthony killed her child but the jury found her not guilty of the murder. In other words, she gets away with it. She's not alone. There are many real murderers who are found not guilty roaming free. I bet the error rate is much higher in that area.

Some 95 percent of felony convictions are the result of plea bargains, with no formal evidence ever presented, and most never bother with an appeal...
That is because they know they are guilty so they take it. For example, if you didn't do anything wrong, would you take it or fight back?
 
Oh damn, another homework for me? LOL...anyway I get it. The error rate should be ZERO. Oh well, for example, many people believe that Casey Anthony killed her child but the jury found her not guilty of the murder. In other words, she gets away with it. She's not alone. There are many real murderers who are found not guilty roaming free. I bet the error rate is much higher in that area.


Now ur talking!
 
Oh damn, another homework for me? LOL...anyway I get it. The error rate should be ZERO. Oh well, for example, many people believe that Casey Anthony killed her child but the jury found her not guilty of the murder. In other words, she gets away with it. She's not alone. There are many real murderers who are found not guilty roaming free. I bet the error rate is much higher in that area.

That is because they know they are guilty so they take it. For example, if you didn't do anything wrong, would you take it or fight back?
Not homework...just...acquiring a little knowledge...if you are going to hold tightly to something, it's best to know a little more about it...
Also, the article goes further in that and shows more errors....but of you are going to kill a person, yes the error rate needs to be zero... anything over, regardless of how many zeros are between it and the decimal point is an innocent life being at risk....
As for me... I am always innocent :) As for others....again I know several people who were innocent and took a plea deal because the cost of losing the trial was too great... and neither side had evidence to prove anything...


Sent from my SGH-T399N using AllDeaf App mobile app
 
Not homework...just...acquiring a little knowledge...if you are going to hold tightly to something, it's best to know a little more about it...
Also, the article goes further in that and shows more errors....but of you are going to kill a person, yes the error rate needs to be zero... anything over, regardless of how many zeros are between it and the decimal point is an innocent life being at risk....
As for me... I am always innocent :) As for others....again I know several people who were innocent and took a plea deal because the cost of losing the trial was too great... and neither side had evidence to prove anything...


Sent from my SGH-T399N using AllDeaf App mobile app
It doesn't make sense to me at all.

Supossedly, you get arrested for breaking in but you didn't break in, you will take a plea deal?
 
Back
Top