Sorry but your are incorrect. They are not standard surgical tools.
They are standard for CI surgeries. Surgeons do not have to go out and invent a new instrument or have one specially made because one does not already exist.
Sorry but your are incorrect. They are not standard surgical tools.
Like your URLs are showing that they are a bit different.
iavswn said:john57 said:Sorry but your are incorrect. They are not standard surgical tools.
They are standard for CI surgeries. Surgeons do not have to go out and invent a new instrument or have one specially made because one does not already exist.
clueless minds remain clueless
NOT true.You can not use Advance Bionics tools to implant a Cochlear N5
Wirelessly posted
Equipments for each implant probably come in packages. Just like you see during a dentist procedures.
clueless minds remain clueless
I am thankful not to get CI inside my head.
They are standard for CI surgeries. Surgeons do not have to go out and invent a new instrument or have one specially made because one does not already exist.
How is an electrode claw not an electrode claw?
You don't speak for me. You don't decide what is best for me. So just back off!
Woah!..umm did she say she was referring to YOU! No she didn't so I think it is you, sir, who needs to do the backing off. Get a grip on yourself
Speak of "uncalled for"....
Whoa, #93, don't get 'em in knots, hear!?
I am thankful not to get CI inside my head.
No offense to those people with CIs.
People who act like they have the skills and knowledge of a cochlear implant surgeon because they have been implanted are worse than people who just simply clueless.
Alright, believe what you want. It's actually in the tens.
Do you guys agree with this blog? I understand that very few device fails, because they just do but now I see why they recalled every single AB if this true: Failing Ugly: Advanced Bionics cochlear implant circuit goes haywire « The Hearing Blog