Why the World Hates the US?

[Liebling:-)))]

Do u remember Iraq and Iran were in war?
Most time, Iraq use chemical for warfare to kill his own people and Iran's people.

Yes, that´s right, including babies as well.

 

[Jiro]

Is this typo?

Iraq, not Iran.

Do u remember Iraq and Iran were in war?
Most time, Iraq use chemical for warfare to kill his own people and Iran's people.

It's not a typo. Saddam did invade a small part of Iran to eradicate Kurds - more like fired some chemical missiles at them.

 

[Byrdie714]

It is not necessary for you are picking on someone that you don't agree.

Nothing is perfect. In fact, I know some soldiers are not happy in Iraq. Some of them are victimized or serious traumas from killing Iraqi people or under attacks. There are a lot of uncivilized people in Middle East, and they brave to believe in religious by telling them to kill people which is not faith themselves because they are brainwashed.


Liebling made a choice to live in Germany with her husband and her children. They are very happy to be there. I am sure that there are a lot of German people are smart than American people. But, I am not saying that we are stupid and lazy. We are virtually victimized of what was happened at World Trade Center, and we were cheated in many things going on in the political events that we don't hear very often.

The problem is that some of us believe everything in the political issues on the news everyday. The information you see or hear which seem true, but you still have to sit back and think about it. It does not matter that it has the fact or not because we have a lot of propaganda in our country. The censorship is still controlled by Time Warner for media news on national television and included some U.S. Gov't's controls and Evangelicals. I still think that they (media) are baby.

Reba told us that she is retired from U.S. Army. She is what she believe in the political issues as well. Sometimes, she is right. It seems that she insists that she is always right all the times. We have the Freedom of Speech anything we wish to talk about. I assume that she has never visited in Iraq or enemy countries. She is really lucky that she stays in our country, and she probably glad to be retired. She is always good at spot things on AD like something missing or error information. Perhaps, she has hawk's eyes. I really enjoy to read Reba's comments. I wish that we have to understand that we need balance between good and bad on our comments.

Let's go back to Liebling. She works at a medical lab for the U.S. military. What is wrong with her job? She cares about our country. Without her, where can we send our injury soldiers in Germany with no available space for them? For sake, she speaks in English and German. Many of us don't know what is REALLY happen in our news so the other country like Germany knows the other side of the news so they want to inform us. We have to learn to compromise the information to come out which one is fact or not. It is not that simple because things are changed quickly.

If they aren't happy in Iraq, then they shouldn't have signed up for our military service. There will alwys be men and women in uniform that is not going to agree with the commander in chief but have to obey his orders.

If not, there is consequences.

Secondly, most men and women in uniform are paid nicely for their service in the military.

Also just because one is bi-lingual doesn't necessairly mean that they have comprehension skills.

 

[webexplorer]

In a shorthand, I thought that Iraq originally attacked Kuwait because it wanted to steal the oil. The Kuwait Gov't alerted the U.S. to pay attention because we bought the oil from Kuwait's company before the World Trade Center was destroyed.

Actually, I had a theory that Al Qaida's original plan was somehow to convince Hussein to attack it because Al wanted to see whether his plan is successful or not. It is probably nothing to do with Hussein, but Hussein was a very sick man.

It was a big mistake that both Clinton and Bush sent our troops there. It was complicated plan. Al's plan was also to express his other group to see that the U.S. troops invaded their country which made them angry and destroyed the WTC and Washington D.C. buildings. We haven't heard a word from Al's new plans so I assume that the U.S. Gov't censored some of the news. I don't know whether the U.S. Gov't is playing with us too long, but I do not have the fact. We also have not heard from the events in Afghanistan since then. Is our troop failing there? I just don't know.

 

[webexplorer]

If they aren't happy in Iraq, then they shouldn't have signed up for our military service. There will alwys be men and women in uniform that is not going to agree with the commander in chief but have to obey his orders.

If not, there is consequences.

Secondly, most men and women in uniform are paid nicely for their service in the military.

Also just because one is bi-lingual doesn't necessairly mean that they have comprehension skills.

That's not quite true. I learned that some people need the money badly so they had to volunteer to join the troops in order to support their family for food, shelter, and a college loan payoff. After they finished their job, then they were very upset that they received half of the money or less. The U.S. Gov't lied to them that it was not the exact information.

 

[Byrdie714]

That's not quite true. I learned that some people need the money badly so they had to volunteer to join the troops in order to support their family for food, shelter, and a college loan payoff. After they finished their job, then they were very upset that they received half of the money or less. The U.S. Gov't lied to them that it was not the exact information.

Link?

I respectfully disagree with your comment due to a personal experience with a military soldier that is being paid nicely for his service to our country. His pay and benefits are rewarding.

Chances are, you may have come across an individual who didn't necessairly obeyed Uncle Sam.

 

[webexplorer]

This is 3 years old news:

'Hardball with Chris Matthews' for May 9 - MSNBC Transcripts - MSNBC.com

If you know where to find an update news about a full college fund from the army, then show us the link. Also, for the same thing for college students were complaint about Gov't is not telling the whole truth when they got home from the Iraq.

 

[Byrdie714]

In a shorthand, I thought that Iraq originally attacked Kuwait because it wanted to steal the oil. The Kuwait Gov't alerted the U.S. to pay attention because we bought the oil from Kuwait's company before the World Trade Center was destroyed.

Actually, I had a theory that Al Qaida's original plan was somehow to convince Hussein to attack it because Al wanted to see whether his plan is successful or not. It is probably nothing to do with Hussein, but Hussein was a very sick man.

It was a big mistake that both Clinton and Bush sent our troops there. It was complicated plan. Al's plan was also to express his other group to see that the U.S. troops invaded their country which made them angry and destroyed the WTC and Washington D.C. buildings. We haven't heard a word from Al's new plans so I assume that the U.S. Gov't censored some of the news. I don't know whether the U.S. Gov't is playing with us too long, but I do not have the fact. We also have not heard from the events in Afghanistan since then. Is our troop failing there? I just don't know.

Clinton never sent troops to Iraq. It was Bush I and Bush II that sent troops there.

Clinton sent troops to Balkans to stop the genocide as the Europeans wouldn't intervene. Again, Europe gets into trouble and it's the Americans that have to take care of it.

 

[Liebling:-)))]

If they aren't happy in Iraq, then they shouldn't have signed up for our military service. There will alwys be men and women in uniform that is not going to agree with the commander in chief but have to obey his orders.

If not, there is consequences.

Secondly, most men and women in uniform are paid nicely for their service in the military.

Also just because one is bi-lingual doesn't necessairly mean that they have comprehension skills.

You really have no idea...

US Army forces 50,000 soldiers into extended duty
Want To Go To War? | US Army forces 50,000 soldiers into extended duty

Soldier's duty: Say no to illegal war
Soldier's duty: Say no to illegal war

5500 US deserters : We won’t fight in Iraq
5500 US deserters : We won't fight in Iraq

Thousands of troops say they won't fight
Voters For Peace: The power to end the war and prevent future wars of aggression

Soldiers Against Iraq War Refuse To Fight
informationliberation - Soldiers Against Iraq War Refuse To Fight

Three U.S. Soldiers Refusing to Fight Speak Out Against the Iraq War

CARL WEBB: Well, I joined. I signed a contract for three years, which would have ended in August of 2004. So, by July, I was very, very happy. I was saying good-bye to everyone in my unit. On several occasions throughout the three years, I had been approached about reenlisting and I always had turned them down. So, in July, I was really happy, until I got a phone call from my sergeant.

CARL WEBB: Yes. I had one more drill to complete. And my sergeant called and said she had bad news. And she said that you're going to Iraq. And immediately I was confused. I said, well, did the unit get activated all of a sudden? She said no. The unit hasn't been activated, we're staying, but you are not going to be allowed to finish your contract. You're being extended and loaned to a different unit, which is going to Iraq..... and further read in those link... (worth to read them and listen their side).

Democracy Now! | Three U.S. Soldiers Refusing to Fight Speak Out Against the Iraq War

US Soldier Found Guilty Of Desertion At Trial in Germany
http://www.alldeaf.com/war-politica...uilty-desertion-trial-germany.html#post792063

Images Haunt Soldier Refusing to Serve in Iraq
http://www.alldeaf.com/war-political-news/13603-images-haunt-soldier-refusing-serve-iraq.html

BBC NEWS | UK | UK troops face trauma after Iraq

BBC NEWS | Middle East | War takes toll on Iraqi mental health


That´s why I support troops.

 

[Banjo]

Clinton never sent troops to Iraq. It was Bush I and Bush II that sent troops there.

Clinton sent troops to Balkans to stop the genocide as the Europeans wouldn't intervene. Again, Europe gets into trouble and it's the Americans that have to take care of it.

Right, Clinton never sent troops to Iraq. However, he did order the air strikes on Iraq in the 90s.

 

[Jiro]

That´s why I support troops.

I'm confused about your comment. Are you saying you support troops... deserting the military? and for refusing to fight?

 

[Liebling:-)))]

I'm confused about your comment. Are you saying you support troops... deserting the military?

I support troops´s reasons why they do not want to go to attack Iraq to make unneccassary war. Check many links why they do not want to go Iraq.

I only support troops for defend our country against enemies, not go and attack enemy´s countries.

 

[Chase]

Has the double talk reduced any of your confusion, Jiro? Ha ha ha, you're not alone. Reminds me of speeches coming out of Germany in the late '30s, early '40s. They were head-scratchers, too.

 

[Jiro]

I support troops´s reasons why they do not want to go to attack Iraq to make unneccassary war. Check many links why they do not want to go Iraq.

I only support troops for defend our country against enemies, not go and attack enemy´s countries.

I cannot support troops who speak out against their superiors. That's the sign of mutiny, disruption, and disobedience. We can't have any of those in military - no matter what the case is. When you join military - you are sworn to uphold the Constitution and chain of command. You are expected to follow the orders explicitly - for the sake of survival. Soldier's opinion is of no concern and should be limited to one's self. He has no place in military to question their authority.

A hijacked jumbo jet of 500 passengers flying toward to NYC from Atlantic Ocean. The President and military generals do not know for sure what the terrorists' agenda is. All they know is that the plane is hijacked. We cannot afford to take a risk that maybe he will hit the skyscraper in NYC or maybe he just wants to land at LaGuardia airport. Therefore - the President issued an order to shoot it down. However, a pilot refused to do so because of innocent people in plane. Do you want that kind of soldier in military?

 

[Jiro]

btw Liebling - Do you support our action to attack Afghanistan? or Bosnia? or Somalia?

 

[Liebling:-)))]

btw Liebling - Do you support our action to attack Afghanistan? or Bosnia? or Somalia?

No, again - I only support troops to defend our country to against enemies from other countries.

 

[Jiro]

No, again - I only support troops to defend our country to against enemies from other countries.

That's.... pretty disturbing. I don't know what's worse - helping a victim by attacking the bully or watching a bully beating him up.

 

[Liebling:-)))]

I cannot support troops who speak out against their superiors. That's the sign of mutiny, disruption, and disobedience. We can't have any of those in military - no matter what the case is. When you join military - you are sworn to uphold the Constitution and chain of command. You are expected to follow the orders explicitly - for the sake of survival. Soldier's opinion is of no concern and should be limited to one's self. He has no place in military to question their authority.

A hijacked jumbo jet of 500 passengers flying toward to NYC from Atlantic Ocean. The President and military generals do not know for sure what the terrorists' agenda is. All they know is that the plane is hijacked. We cannot afford to take a risk that maybe he will hit the skyscraper in NYC or maybe he just wants to land at LaGuardia airport. Therefore - the President issued an order to shoot it down. However, a pilot refused to do so because of innocent people in plane. Do you want that kind of soldier in military?

Please read those links then you will understand why they feel being betray by Government which they thought they doing their job to serve for their country and defend their country. I support troops for defend our countries against enemies.

 

[Liebling:-)))]

That's.... pretty disturbing. I don't know what's worse - helping a victim by attacking the bully or watching a bully beating him up.

Of course they are helping victims against enemies... that´s why I support for that... Not attack them, but helping victims against enemies... arrest right one..., not attack all innocnent people including children from enemy countries.


Example: We have US and German troops here in Germany. They only doing to defend for our country. They help us if any happened to us...

 

[Jiro]

Please read those links then you will understand why they feel being betray by Government which they thought they doing their job to serve for their country and defend their country. I support troops for defend our countries against enemies.

Betrayed or not - it's not relevant. I live with comfort knowing that the soldiers will do the job without questions. That's why I have a strong respect for them. We all know it's a shit job and it's fubar. Killing people? that ain't easy. Many people do not understand what require of them to have such strong discipline and mindset to obey a very difficult order.

It's you the citizens who vote the Commander-in-Chief to run our country and to lead our soldiers SO CHOOSE YOUR LEADER WISELY! Again - I strongly do not support the troops who have dissenting views toward their superiors - by doing so, they're putting everybody's lives in danger. They do not belong in military. They're better off being as protesters or civilians.