- Joined
- Jan 13, 2004
- Messages
- 31,020
- Reaction score
- 10
I agree with you completely about personal resposnibility. But the sad fact is, that few people who drive drunk are willing to accept personal resposnibility for their actions. If they were willing todo so, they wouldn't be driving drunk. And the way our laws are set up, we allow them to continue to refuse to accept that personal responsibility.
Likewise, an alchoholic or a drug addict is not capable of accepting personal responsibility for their behaviors because their substance abuse problem influences their decision making abilities. How to get more alcohol, or the drug of choice is the focus of all their behavior. That is why the law has been made that a bartender who serves a person who is obviously drunk has contributed to the accident that happened following the person leaving the bar. Doctors can also be held legally responsible if they prescribe addictive substances to a known drug addict.
In short, a person with a substance abuse problem does not accept personal responsibility for their behavior not because they are bad people, but becasue they are under the control of their addiction. If we enable them by allowing them to continue in their addiction by supplying them alcohol or making it easy for them to get ahold of any intoxicating substance, then we have not accepted our own personal responsibility.
*nodding understood*
I think the US law for drinking driver are too easy for them... They should strict with drinking drivers - example banned their driving licesne temparily with high fine penatly, no matter either accident or not... depend how % in their blood then send them back to driving school which it cost a lot of money. If they repeat then their driving liescne will ban permanently. (depend on how huge accidents).