neecy said:TrippLA is this profanity really necessary?
neecy said:What aren't you understanding? I'm simply wondering why you feel the need to interject profanity in your dialogues. It's rather crude.
TrippLA said:That's kidding with IceCream, just ignore him though. We let make fun of him though.
R2D2 said:I would say that making fun of people and encouraging others to ignore him is bullying myself. You don't have to agree with his views but at least respond to him in a non personal way.
Cheri said:That's why you'll see members here judge those parents or late implated adults because of how they wording their posts, It's more like a slap in the face to the Deaf community, and insults to the Deaf. I'm not going to sit here and lie to you about how I've seen it and How I feel when reading posts across this board about those who shared their experience and based on how they answered questions, It's always about what they want, the parents the lated implainted deafness who doesn't have children yet, but somedays they would. But, what about the children? Do the implanted children have the right to know it's Deaf Culture?
Cheri said:How does it works both ways? Deflord is missing the point. Let me explain something here,
When I said that, Most hearing parents implanted their Deaf children, they're not accepting the child for who he/she is since birth, does not involved their children in the Deaf community, ONLY hearing world.
When Most Deaf Parents have hearing children, Do you see them implanting or poking something in their ears in order to make a child deaf like the parents?No, because Deaf parents accept their hearing children, the way he/she was born.
And Most hearing parents want their CI implant children involved more in the hearing world because the parents are hearing.
And Most Deaf parents allowing their hearing children involved in hearing word, (Hearing Culture) because the children are hearing, The parents are not dragging them in their world (Deaf Culture)
You see the big differences?
DefLord said:You know just because a child was implanted with a CI Doesnt mean that they aren't accepting the child. You know this world is 99% hearing! We have to work with HEARING people but then again the majority of the deaf community chooses to work either in a deaf related occupation or collect SSDI. And you know what - those who do learn to live and communicate in the hearing world will for sure succeed in real life and achieve further success than those who don't. I bet if the government took away SSDI for all the deaf individuals and FORCED them to WORK for a living - then that would definitely force deaf individuals to LEARN that they will have to learn how to CO-EXIST with the hearing culture. And those who are arguing for deaf culture - what exactly is your definition of deaf culture? Is it the language? Is it the common bond? And honestly I am really sitting here (You guys might think Im pissed here but Im not) I am really laughing hard here because you guys are feeling so threatened by one little piece of technology and that the WHOLE deaf community is going to come crashing down. Let's see - One former NAD President has a CI and his daughter too. Both are VERY VERY active in the deaf community. My father and I both have a CI both of us are very very active in the deaf community. And none of us 4 have EVER claimed to be HEARING. You can't stereotype that just because ONE person said that He/SHe is hearing that they all are the same. But my main argument with this whole thing is how people are saying just because someone gets a CI the person/parent doesnt accept themselves/or their child as a deaf individual. That is my real argument with this whole thing - because that is something I STRONGLY disagree with.
TrippLA said:Let me break and talk with someone that have CI. TLA is me and JoeCI is other guy with CI...
TLA: Have u got CI?
JoeCI: Yes, I got it and it feel so wonderful.
TLA: really?
JoeCI: It's work like big hearing superman.
TLA: Oh my god, give me some break... u talk like shit.
JoeCI: Why??? I think CI is good for all deaf people and You can active with it.
TLA: o_O What the fuck wrong with u?
JoeCI: Man, CI is great devices and make us become hearing again.
TLA: really? Are u no longer to be deaf?
JoeCI: Yes, That's wonderful news for me, I feel very loud and perfect.
TLA: How about u can swimming with CI?
JoeCI: It's work for me and I can swimming with CI in it, no problem.
TLA: Oh shit... Seriously, u looks like retarded.
JoeCI: Wait, I would ask to make new bills for all deaf people are required to get CI when they are born or toddlers with hearing loss. I hope it will pass and watch me.
TLA: Shit again, I doubt it would be happen and deaf people will probably protest against u, sounds like Civil Rights of 1964. God bless MLK.
JoeCI: I'm not talking about MLK, he looks stupid. I heard that black people don't get CI. I think they need go back to Africa.
TLA: What the fuck? Don't talk to me like racist and CI don't make u become hearing again. It's cannot cure it though.
JoeCI: Oh no, it's cure for me and I feel hearing today, I learned all new voices. I can talk regular as hearing people does.
TLA: that's bullshit, how about u sleeping at night?
JoeCI: I do sleep with CI on and batteries are run so well. I can hear real aliens and ghosts.
TLA: WOW... U R RETARDED. Please take ur CI off now.
JoeCI: It's still hearing after take CI off.
TLA: again, stop fool at me. I know u r still deaf when u got implanted... it don't cure to become hearing again, all of ur stories seems bullshit.
JoeCI:Leave me alone... You are bother me and not agree what I said. That hurts my feeling.
TLA: good bye and have bad luck with ur CI then STFU.
now, he got owned by our deaf anti-CI group.
It supposed to notice what they talk about CI in real world and they think it will cure to become hearing again. I will see their stupid CI stories.
TrippLA said:I doubt they will cut SSDI.
DefLord said:Seriously - you need to stay off this forums and let the adults talk. You need to stay in school and focus on graduating. This is the most ridiculous post I have read tonight. At least most of the others who are debating aren't cussing or making up some crazy scenario like you.
DefLord said:Honestly THEY SHOULD! It is a WASTE of my taxpayers money! I work everyday 40-50 hours a week - and if I can do it so can every other deaf individual!
And if there ever was a bill - believe me I would ADVOCATE it! Because it is a joke and an embarrassment because it is saying "Oooohh poor us! We can't work, we are deaf - we can't work with hearing people we need government money" No the money should go to those who REALLY need it - aka the elderly, the REALLY Disabled *aka wheelchairs and etc*
Cheri said:Let's keep it cool and under control here.
We don't want to see this good thread being ruin or going down the drain, Wouldn't you either?
Cheri said:When I said that, Most hearing parents implanted their Deaf children, they're not accepting the child for who he/she is since birth, does not involved their children in the Deaf community, ONLY hearing world.
When Most Deaf Parents have hearing children, Do you see them implanting or poking something in their ears in order to make a child deaf like the parents?No, because Deaf parents accept their hearing children, the way he/she was born.
And Most hearing parents want their CI implant children involved more in the hearing world because the parents are hearing.
And Most Deaf parents allowing their hearing children involved in hearing word, (Hearing Culture) because the children are hearing, The parents are not dragging them in their world (Deaf Culture)
You see the big differences?
R2D2 said:I acknowledge you feelings but your argument is with the feelings and attitudes hearing people/ implanted adults generally not with CIs themselves. CIs are no different to hearing aids in that regard. The same people you are unhappy with were and are doing exactly the same things with hearing aids - creating people who can talk like them.
Should hearing aids likewise be withheld from children who could benefit from them so that they can be immersed in the deaf culture first? Why the difference between the two? From an invasive point of view we are only talking about a one off few hours of surgery to insert some very fine electrode wires and then after that CIs are used in a manner not dissimilar to hearing aids.
I wouldn't say then that CIs hurt deaf culture, I don't personally see them as much different to hearing aids. The CI doesn't turn you into a hearing person and the child or adult is still obviously deaf in public with the processor and magnet in place. Therefore you are still going to have people who want to find others like them just like people with hearing aids did.
DefLord said:Because it is a joke and an embarrassment because it is saying "Oooohh poor us! We can't work, we are deaf - we can't work with hearing people we need government money" No the money should go to those who REALLY need it - aka the elderly, the REALLY Disabled *aka wheelchairs and etc*
well, that's what google and yahoo, ask.com are for^Angel^ said:Good point, but I do have a question here if I may please?..
If hearing parents do not have friends or family that are deaf they usually will not receive any information from the deaf world and when they find out their baby is deaf, the doctors usually provide information about CI, but how would a hearing parent know there more out there that their child can be involved in and be social with other deaf children?...