STDs still on the rise, report says

Status
Not open for further replies.
Heh Jiro

My husband's uncle got AID and died, is that helpful ?


there's idiots and crazy people all around you. you have higher chance of getting killed by them than AIDS. Beside - many people with AIDS live very long.

Also I have a link list of Deaf people who have died of AID...Of course they live a long time, but you know what is happening to them, they shit their pants, puke, takes medication and try to eat unable to eat, they are in bed sick with this deadly diseases which is slowly killing them, they even have ugly sores all over them, I've seen the book of AID, really gross also if a person got the FULL BLOWN AID, they live couple month short-term, but if a person doesn't have a full blown aid live longer but slowly gradually dying of Aid.

Have you seen the movie called "GIA"...watch it and see it for yourselves, see what's like to have AID and you know what... people with AID have to wears a diaper everyday, they cannot controls their shit that comes out loosely all day long everyday of their life, wow must be fun to have AID, isn't it ?

Even my husband's grandmother told me all about my husband's uncle dying in bed of AID in a nursing home, it's a mess and hard work taking care of AID patient. Also taking medication over 50 pills a day, was told that there's no cure for AID-HIV or STD.
 
Reba said:
Herpes is a viral infection, not a genetic disorder.
Click to expand...

Unless the child passes through the mother. Remember that there are women out there that do have the herpes virus and can pass it onto their child when born.
 
Jiro said:
so now you know for fact that they are included in the statistics? :hmm:
Click to expand...
Do you know for a fact that they are not?

Unless the statistics sort out cases by mode of transmission, then they're all added together. That could be misleading.
 
Byrdie714 said:
Unless the child passes through the mother. Remember that there are women out there that do have the herpes virus and can pass it onto their child when born.
Click to expand...
They are passing on a virus; it is not a change in the genetic material.

"A genetic disorder is a disease caused by abnormalities in an individual’s genetic material (genome)."
Genetic Disease Information
 
PePe LePew said:
I won't say what book I read, cuz I'm not allow to bring up religion, but it said that a man should sticks with one wife, be clean, you won't have to worry about catching anything if you sticks with the same person all your entire life, that's great, no worry about being sick from AID, HIV or STD.:giggle:
Click to expand...


Then why the 'giggle' emoticon?

I don't think it's funny.
 
Herpes has been classified as type 1 and type 2.

Type 1 used to be the cold sores the lip type. Type 2 used to be the gentile type or the STD type.

Now both types are found in both areas. Due to oral sex. So I agree with your post being an STD to a certain point.

What about children and adults that share a drink!! And get a fever blister?
And get it. How would you classify that?

My son first fever blisters was at the age of two (AKA herpes) He surely was not sexually active at the age of two.

I'm personally have been fortunate to never experience a fever blister. But my poor son got it from drinking after his affected father.

Never had him tested on what type he may have.
 
Byrdie

You misunderstand my english sentences.

Byrdie714 said:
Then why the 'giggle' emoticon?

I don't think it's funny.
Click to expand...

you won't have to worry about catching anything if you sticks with the same person all your entire life, that's great, no worry about being sick from AID, HIV or STD.

Not giggling about AID, HIV or STD...I'm saying you don't have to worry about catching anything by sticking with the same person and that's great, giggle!

Didn't I mentioned it wasn't funny ..hmmmm!
 
Reba said:
Do you know for a fact that they are not?

Unless the statistics sort out cases by mode of transmission, then they're all added together. That could be misleading.
Click to expand...

I guess we'll have to ask CDC, eh?
 
Reba

Found this link here Hepatitis C Facts

It said H C is STD.

Reba said:
Then it's not strictly an STD.

All the more reason for people to avoid sex outside of marriage; no one wants to pass down diseases to their children.
Click to expand...

It is thru blood, well you know women get their [RIDES]-period, should not be having sex during menstruation beside razor, sharing needles and others.
 
I understand where's Reba coming from. Yes herpes and Hep. C are STDs because they can be sexually transmitted . It depends on how it's transmitted in order to categorize it.

If you got herpes/hep. c from sex - then it's called STD
If you got herpes/hep. c from birth - then it's "passed it on" (I can't remember the term)
If you got hep. c from tainted blood transfusion - then it's called..... help me out in here, Reba
 
Byrdie714 said:
What if the partner doesn't know they are carrying an STD?
Click to expand...

Which is entirely possible, as many infected people are asymptomatic, and others can go for a long period of time before any symptoms manifest.
 
Byrdie714 said:
One can contract an STD genetically and may not know that they are carriers of the disease.

Herpes is the most common one.
Click to expand...

Syphillis and gonnorhea can also be contracted congenitally. And, with the number of persons who actually are asymptomatic, this is not uncommon.
 
Reba said:
Then it's not strictly an STD.

All the more reason for people to avoid sex outside of marriage; no one wants to pass down diseases to their children.
Click to expand...

No one wants to, but the unfortunate reality is that it happens. And if you truly believe that people will avoid sex outside of marraige, you are indeed living in a fantasy world. It has never happened, and it is never going to happen. So let's deal with the reality, and educate as a preventive measure to negative consequence.
 
Reba said:
So the spread of some STD's has nothing to do with abstinence only teaching, huh? I wonder if they were included in the statistics?
Click to expand...

Yes, actually, they do, especially in cases of HIV infection, and Hep C. Etiology is determined by risk factor. And it really doesn't matter how one individual may have contracted the disease. They still have the potential to spread it through sexual contact, no matter their own etiology.
 
jillio said:
Yes, actually, they do, especially in cases of HIV infection, and Hep C. Etiology is determined by risk factor. And it really doesn't matter how one individual may have contracted the disease. They still have the potential to spread it through sexual contact, no matter their own etiology.
Click to expand...
They have the potential to spread thru sexual contact. But that doesn't mean they were spread that way when compiling the statistics.

Potential infection isn't the same as actual infection.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top