faire_jour
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2008
- Messages
- 7,188
- Reaction score
- 3
Wirelessly posted
unfortunatly, when you sim-com you are providing lingustically confusing information that does as much harm as good.
Also, doesn't your child have the right to ALL information, not just what directly concerns him? Hearing kids have that access, the ability to "overhear" conversations that have nothing to do with them. In fact, 90% of language is learned that way, and you aren't providing that for your child. He is missing out on crucial learning opportunities every single time you don't sign. If he doesn't have the chance to watch natural, adult level, language, how will he ever become fluent? He needs to be able to watch fluent users use language that isn't directed at him. He needs to see you discuss bills and wallpaper and the mechanic. He shouldn't just rely on you "bringing him up to speed" in a condensed version because he missed out when you chose to leave him out.
Mountain Man said:I may be a little late to the thread, but I think I can answer this question as I have one deaf child and the rest of the household is hearing (I have three children seven and under; my deaf son recently turned 5):Reading other threads, someone made a comment about having other hearing children in the house. The challenges that come along with having one DHH child, and the rest of the house is hearing. So what do you propose Jillio? Everyone turn their voice off all the time? What about when we are communicating with others who are hearing and the DHH child is in the room? Verbally respond to a question and then sign your answer in ASL, or respond verbally and in sign at the same time so that child still has access to the conversation going on?
As a family, we are committed to learning ASL, so if it's information that is important for all the children to receive then we sign it so that they all have equal access. Sometimes we will go voice-off for a day outing -- to the zoo, for example -- for the practice, to include my deaf son as much as possible, and because it's fun (you should see the looks we get; I've noticed that hearing people suddenly stop talking when they think they're around Deaf people). My wife and I sign as much as possible when communicating with each other, though it is often sim-com because our signing skills are still developing. If there is information being conveyed in the room and nobody is signing at the moment, we make a judgment call and convey the information to my deaf son if we think it's something he should know or might want to know. For instance, my wife and I were discussing one of us running out to pick up a video. My hearing son overheard us and commented, so I took a moment to explain the conversation to my deaf son so that when one of us suddenly walked out the door, he wouldn't be confused and wonder what was going on. What's really precious is when we catch our kids in a room by themselves all signing away to each other.
In short, choosing to have a bilingual household is a pretty major lifestyle decision and takes commitment, discipline, and the support of the entire family.
unfortunatly, when you sim-com you are providing lingustically confusing information that does as much harm as good.
Also, doesn't your child have the right to ALL information, not just what directly concerns him? Hearing kids have that access, the ability to "overhear" conversations that have nothing to do with them. In fact, 90% of language is learned that way, and you aren't providing that for your child. He is missing out on crucial learning opportunities every single time you don't sign. If he doesn't have the chance to watch natural, adult level, language, how will he ever become fluent? He needs to be able to watch fluent users use language that isn't directed at him. He needs to see you discuss bills and wallpaper and the mechanic. He shouldn't just rely on you "bringing him up to speed" in a condensed version because he missed out when you chose to leave him out.