Roe v. Wade - For Men

souggy said:
Wirelessly posted

Or go gay.

Surprisingly even anal still carries a risk of pregnancy.
Click to expand...

Yeah, cuz some can drool out of anus and into open vagina. I guess keep her on bottom so it drools away from vagina.

I recall a soap opera where a woman "captured" some sperm, and, using a turkey baster, injected it into her womb. :eek3:
 
Deaffy said:
This is laughable.. Right's? The woman has a right just as a man does to say no to sex in the first place it takes TWO people but only one of those TWO people have a say in the course of a child. Woman in marriage's have accidental pregnancys and then go behind their husbands back without telling him about the abortion or the pregnancy in teh begining..It's far too much power to give one person to obtain the right to give life or not.!
Click to expand...

That is exactly what I was pointing out ... thanks for clarifying.
 
Steinhauer said:
That is exactly what I was pointing out ... thanks for clarifying.
Click to expand...

there's nothing to clarify. there's nothing to point out. there's nothing to discuss either!!!!

It doesn't matter what you say anyway. Nothing. Absolutely nothing. It's meaningless. Roe v. Wade - the Supreme Court has spoken and it's over. Period. There's absolutely nothing further to debate. Roe v. Wade will most likely never get overturned. To do so is a sign to me that America ceases to exist as a progressive nation and that it will regress back to old Islam style - stoning women for infidelity, making women walk behind us, reducing their rights, etc.

For now - you should be taking your issue to your significant other and discuss about it and agree on it. Your business is your business and that's your prerogative rights between both of you but you have no rights to tell others on how to conduct their businesses.
 
Jiro said:
there's nothing to clarify. there's nothing to point out. there's nothing to discuss either!!!!

It doesn't matter what you say anyway. Nothing. Absolutely nothing. It's meaningless. Roe v. Wade - the Supreme Court has spoken and it's over. Period. There's absolutely nothing further to debate.
Click to expand...

Funny, I thought the Conservatives were against abortion. Now we have them trying to defend a man's right to choose abortion for his sexual partner. How absurd.

That is why I do not debate abortion. Does not matter how I feel. It never changes anyone's mind.
 
saywhatkid said:
Funny, I thought the Conservatives were against abortion. Now we have them trying to defend a man's right to choose abortion for his sexual partner. How absurd.

That is why I do not debate abortion. Does not matter how I feel. It never changes anyone's mind.
Click to expand...

But... there are some liberals are pro-life too.
 
KarissaMann05 said:
But... there are some liberals are pro-life too.
Click to expand...
Absolutely. I am referring to pro-life people that are in favor of men getting to choose abortion for the woman. Against it as a whole, but also against giving the woman "so much power" to keep a fetus to term. Does that make sense?
 
saywhatkid said:
Absolutely. I am referring to pro-life people that are in favor of men getting to choose abortion for the woman. Against it as a whole, but also against giving the woman "so much power" to keep a fetus to term. Does that make sense?
Click to expand...

Ah, okay. I see what you do mean. But I don't think anyone say woman must to have an abortion if man don't want a child. I just glance through posts here and none of us said that. And, I don't support that idea. Since you think there are only pro-lifers are "support" that idea, here's a link (http://scorpionousauterelle.deviantart.com/art/Father-s-Choice-Stamp-118409808). He is a pro-choicer and I personally don't think he agree with you.
 
KarissaMann05 said:
Ah, okay. I see what you do mean. But I don't think anyone say woman must to have an abortion if man don't want a child. I just glance through posts here and none of us said that. And, I don't support that idea. Since you think there are only pro-lifers are "support" that idea, here's a link (Father's Choice Stamp by ~ScorpionOuSauterelle on deviantART). He is a pro-choicer and I personally don't think he agree with you.
Click to expand...
Not true, the bolded area. I said that I found it odd that some pro-life people, including the OP, feel that men should have a say.

I will summarize it one more time. If a man puts his penis into a vagina, he is at the mercy of the woman if she becomes pregnant. Does not matter if they talked about it. Does not matter if the man does not want a child. If the man puts his penis into a vagina, he gives up the 100% chance of avoiding fathering an offspring. It may not seem fair, but that is what happens when the white stuff shoots out of the little red head and into a woman. If the man wants to avoid this, he needs to: not put his penis into vaginas, get a vasectomy, use condoms, or take matters into his own hands. That is all. Nothing else gives the man 100% safety from creating life. If he chooses to take his chances, he will not always win.
 
saywhatkid said:
Not true, the bolded area. I said that I found it odd that some pro-life people, including the OP, feel that men should have a say.

I will summarize it one more time. If a man puts his penis into a vagina, he is at the mercy of the woman if she becomes pregnant. Does not matter if they talked about it. Does not matter if the man does not want a child. If the man puts his penis into a vagina, he gives up the 100% chance of avoiding fathering an offspring. It may not seem fair, but that is what happens when the white stuff shoots out of the little red head and into a woman. If the man wants to avoid this, he needs to: not put his penis into vaginas, get a vasectomy, use condoms, or take matters into his own hands. That is all. Nothing else gives the man 100% safety from creating life. If he chooses to take his chances, he will not always win.
Click to expand...

That is what CURRENTLY happens.....
 
Jiro said:
there's nothing to clarify. there's nothing to point out. there's nothing to discuss either!!!!

It doesn't matter what you say anyway. Nothing. Absolutely nothing. It's meaningless. Roe v. Wade - the Supreme Court has spoken and it's over. Period. There's absolutely nothing further to debate. Roe v. Wade will most likely never get overturned. To do so is a sign to me that America ceases to exist as a progressive nation and that it will regress back to old Islam style - stoning women for infidelity, making women walk behind us, reducing their rights, etc.

For now - you should be taking your issue to your significant other and discuss about it and agree on it. Your business is your business and that's your prerogative rights between both of you but you have no rights to tell others on how to conduct their businesses.
Click to expand...


Breathe in .... breathe out ..... if there is nothing to discuss why is there 9 pages of posts? (your full of it and you know it ... hee hee)


I think you just don't know how to argue against valid points without stooping to ad hom attacks ... but that is just my opinion.


besides - here is another gender equality issue -


Woman Seeks To Make Baring Breasts Legal - Boston News Story - WCVB Boston
 
Deaffy said:
The woman has a right just as a man does to say no to sex in the first place it takes TWO people but only one of those TWO people have a say in the course of a child. Woman in marriage's have accidental pregnancys and then go behind their husbands back without telling him about the abortion or the pregnancy in teh begining..It's far too much power to give one person to obtain the right to give life or not!
Click to expand...
thanks for clarifying, yup, it takes two, BOTH. so, again it's TOTAL men's responsible to talk with women before going further.

if she says she's gonna abort, intercourse. if she says she's not gonna abort, don't intercourse, use safeties or divorce her. to prevent "secret" abortions .. if you go ahead without safety; your problem. if you didn't wanted to father in first place. takes two, BOTH. 1) talk, 2) decision, 3) action, 4) consequence.

like saywhatkid said, it takes a pecker. repeating: men should know their women better before doing anything. most likely impossible tricking a father, especially if it was a night-stand. he could be a responsible guy ASKING for medical documentation (if girlfriend 'can't produce'). I would. just same as taking AIDS test before risking yourself. wise. unfortunately, he wasn't/isn't. our problem?

no.
 
freckles said:
thanks for clarifying, yup, it takes two, BOTH. so, again it's TOTAL men's responsible to talk with women before going further.

if she says she's gonna abort, intercourse. if she says she's not gonna abort, don't intercourse, use safeties or divorce her. to prevent "secret" abortions .. if you go ahead without safety; your problem. if you didn't wanted to father in first place. takes two, BOTH. 1) talk, 2) decision, 3) action, 4) consequence.

like saywhatkid said, it takes a pecker. repeating: men should know their women better before doing anything. most likely impossible tricking a father, especially if it was a night-stand. he could be a responsible guy ASKING for medical documentation (if girlfriend 'can't produce'). I would. just same as taking AIDS test before risking yourself. wise. unfortunately, he wasn't/isn't. our problem?

no.
Click to expand...


It appears you keep focusing on men's decision to have sex without addressing the fact that the woman is a willing partner.


Why would a woman abort in a situation like that if the father wants the responsibility?


Hint: .... because as of 1973, she can

Laws change all the time.
 
Back
Top