diehardbiker
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2004
- Messages
- 16,188
- Reaction score
- 16
why must be DNA? DNA is fallible.
Thanks for proving CP wrong about DNA! Thumbs up!

why must be DNA? DNA is fallible.
Thanks for proving CP wrong about DNA! Thumbs up!CP claims that DNA is so much advanced so that that you will be shocked in other thread. LOL
Really? Do you have proof? It has to be DNA!
you just shot your own foot....
you're saying DNA = proof and now you're saying it's not?![]()
Your own brother...
damn girl...
Thats some cold steal you got there.....
Some people may think so....but I know I did the right thing...and believe it or not, when I visited him in jail before he was taken back to Texas...he actually Thanked Me!....He was tired of running...he was getting help for his Heroin addiction, and he no longer could deal it to people, kids or whoever....
how's he doing now? still in prison or...?
Read an article about David Sweat...his Mother had a lot to say about her son. Not good at all, tho'...but she loves him but said he "was gone"...FBI is keeping watch over her house...which reminded me of the time my brother was on the lam from Texas....the FBI watched my house for a week in case my brother came....he didn't...but he showed up where I worked...and Yes, I turned him in.
DNA is what the Innocence Project uses to exonerate convicts. Isn't that what you support?Thanks for proving CP wrong about DNA! Thumbs up!CP claims that DNA is so much advanced so that that you will be shocked in other thread. LOL
DNA is what the Innocence Project uses to exonerate convicts. Isn't that what you support?
Oh, you are saying that you would protect your own brother who sold dope to children? SMHYour own brother...
damn girl...
Thats some cold steal you got there.....
Oh, you are saying that you would protect your own brother who sold dope to children? SMH
So, do you give equal value to DNA evidence, whether it's used by the prosecutor to convict someone, or by the Innocence Project to exonerate someone?It depends the quality of evidences. I am not discount anything on DNA, but I don't treat it as 100% solid evidence. Its merely support or against one's theory, that's all.
Then does this mean men that are "well endowed " are more likely to be abused .![]()
I saw on my local news that the polices are worried the 2 convicted will hijack a car or hold a family hostage to get more money to buy weapons
and kill the whole family . The polices and FBI needs to find these monsters fast!