- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 45,078
- Reaction score
- 323
You need to read my post history, dreama, before you make assumptions. I am proficient in sign language. I actually learned ASL before I ever learned to speak. When I speak of the exceptions out there, I refer to children who have succeeded beyond everyone's expectations instead of subjecting them to standards just because it's documented standards.
I just about fell out of my chair when reading that bolded statement about the girl turning to prostitution. Her turning to prostitution has nothing to do with her being oral. I think you owe an apology to all those on this forum and worldwide who are oral. I guess if I get fired from my job for whatever reason I can turn to prositution because I had an oral environment in addition to sign.
What about the numerous deaf children who suffer from language delays or worse evn, language deficients due to not having full access to language and communication during their younger years? All because those in the medical field told their parents not to expose them to sign language?
I only want children to have both..oral and ASL just like Dreama said. I would never agree to the oral-only philosophy cuz of these kinds of risks. Sure their are exceptions but while they are young, nobody really knows how much they r getting.
Another issue is deaf children havign equal access to as their hearing counterparts in the educational setting. That was a big problem for me...all the sake for oral-only.
That's my view and I feel entitled to it and if others don't like it, oh well. I would be lying just to please people here.
Not trying to argue with u here but u mentioned exceptions.