Thanks Jill. I see It's religious. I'm not sure how that applies to post 364. Maybe it's just me but I don't see the connection.
The connection is that Focus on Family and this text share the same values and is mostly about the same thing, extremism.
For example this statement is a bit on the extreme edge.
"When making the decision to choose the cochlear implant,
there is absolutely no evidence to suggest that parents are not making well informed, reasoned, and rational decisions that are in the best interests of their children. To
intrude into the parents' decision-making process
without such evidence, is unwarranted, unjustified, and unethical......."
First, there does exits evidence that most parents are not making fully reasoned and rational decisions that are in the best of their children regarding the use of CI. Findings shows a large gap between degree of success when looking at qualitative versus quantitative data. Parents and teachers in mainstream schools often have different views on how well a child is doing socially and academically.
Second, the threat that it's "unwarranted, unjustified, and unethical" to "intrude", even if there exists scientifical evidence of the oposite, is similar to the many statements from extreme organizations. Isn't it a bit telling that pro-CI'ers resort to this technique?