jillio
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2006
- Messages
- 60,232
- Reaction score
- 19
Just saw your edit, well, of course, my last few responses in this thread were all made on that the basis of the Columbus motel robbery incident. I did not and still do not state it applies to anyone, other than the deadly force law, it is different for civilians in the US, but the same for law enforcement. I'm merely trying to show you that the actions of the CCW holder were justified, and that the use of a drawn gun can be classified under act of deadly force which was legal there for Ohio's terms. It doesn't matter (to the law) if it looked like he was only going to rob the motel, even if it was really a BB gun.
In the end that particular case went the way it legally should have, but if we want to talk till we're blue on the basis of moral grounds then we can exchange points all day but it'll never get anywhere. Legally, again, much against anyone's dismay, that CCW civilian is waived from any wrongdoing.
If we don't like these kind of laws being around, then we gotta abolish them. People should vote/work to appeal those laws if they are not appreciated.
What is found to be justifiable in one state does not necessarily mean that it will be found to be justifiable in another state. That is my point. But thank you, because in effect, you supported my position that it is not illegal to defend yourself, including the use of deadly force.