Josh Duggar resigns from Family Research Council after sexual abuse allegations

You should probably read some history yourself. Orthodox Jews do not support same sex marriage either, and it is based on their religious beliefs.

We're they "privileged" as you claim for centuries?

It sounds like quibbling. I don't understand why are you attacking on me and I was just try to help you. I'm nowhere to be alike as Jiro.

I already read a lot of histories about religions and there are plenty of information online but you are not familiar with LGBT history so that why you need to check.

Homosexuality was devalued for centuries.

Yes, Christians enjoyed their privilege and they had really decent living for many years as many gay men locked in mental institution or chronic homeless.
 
It sounds like quibbling. I don't understand why are you attacking on me and I was just try to help you. I'm nowhere to be alike as Jiro.

I already read a lot of histories about religions and there are plenty of information online but you are not familiar with LGBT history so that why you need to check.

Homosexuality was devalued for centuries.

Yes, Christians enjoyed their privilege and they had really decent living for many years as many gay men locked in mental institution or chronic homeless.


http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/nazi-doctors-hitler-was-gay-took-female-hormones/article/2517746

Newly discovered notes from a U.S. Army interview of former Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler doctors reveal that the madman had homosexual tendencies, did not sleep in girlfriend Eva Braun's bedroom, and was doped up with multiple drugs including female hormones.

Written in erratic shorthand, Army interrogator Herman Merl, a Vienna-born medical technician enlisted to interview Hitler's doctors, Karl Brandt and Theodor Morell, scribbled "Homosex" in his notebook where he sized up the mass murderer's sexuality.


I have a question for you ... if people are living in accordance with God's will, and are then blessed for this, would you call that "privileged"?

If so, it sounds to me like you have a problem with God, not me. I am not attacking you Foxrac, I like you very much.
 
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/nazi-doctors-hitler-was-gay-took-female-hormones/article/2517746




I have a question for you ... if people are living in accordance with God's will, and are then blessed for this, would you call that "privileged"?

If so, it sounds to me like you have a problem with God, not me. I am not attacking you Foxrac, I like you very much.

Hate to say, the article you posted is myth.

You believe in unusual, bizarre articles, but it does devalue the homosexuality more further, that's bad.

No, I don't believe in the God anymore but honest with you, you are partially contributed that I converted to atheist because you constantly attacking on homosexuality instead of balance between two factions.

I was humiliated by anti-gay Christians that shared hateful information about homosexuality, even bisexuality is no good so they are encouraging me to commit suicide because I'm not belong to society.

What is wrong with you all!!!
 
http://www.thetrevorproject.org/pages/facts-about-suicide

Those will not happen if you don't promote the anti-gay environment and it will not change about how LGBT people but it will make worse.

If you are complicated about homosexuality so it is best interest for you to not discuss at all and discuss about anything based on myths are discouraged.

The world looks better without social war but if you are getting in social war, it make anything worse, even devalue the homosexuality and Christianity together. It is best to treat everyone with respect instead of war with them.
 
LBGT are not trying to destroy religions. They are pointing out the lies and hypocrisy used to attack and oppress them and prevent them from equal rights and treatment.
RELIGION IS TRYING TO CONSTANTLY FORCE THEIR DOCTRINE AND BELIEF OF THOSE WHO ARE NOT MEMBERS OF THAT RELIGION.
LBGT community is not trying to force any religion or it's members to become GAY LESBIAN BISEXUAL OR TRANSGENDER. Therefore they are not opressing or destroying any religion.

not ALL religions or religious people are doing this.
Pls
Dont paint all us with the same brush...
Thank you
 
That is not correct. Josh's father brought it to the attention of the church. It took the church 3 months (not three years) to report the activity to the police.

The following is a statement from the Duggars' facebook page:

that would be incorrect.

Josh Duggar's father brought in a family friend (State Trooper) to have a talk with Josh. And that state trooper did not report it to police department. That is a pretty serious dereliction and that's probably because he was a pedophile.
 
that would be incorrect.

Josh Duggar's father brought in a family friend (State Trooper) to have a talk with Josh. And that state trooper did not report it to police department. That is a pretty serious dereliction and that's probably because he was a pedophile.

I bet that Duggar family lied to public.
 
LBGT are not trying to destroy religions. They are pointing out the lies and hypocrisy used to attack and oppress them and prevent them from equal rights and treatment.
RELIGION IS TRYING TO CONSTANTLY FORCE THEIR DOCTRINE AND BELIEF OF THOSE WHO ARE NOT MEMBERS OF THAT RELIGION.
LBGT community is not trying to force any religion or it's members to become GAY LESBIAN BISEXUAL OR TRANSGENDER. Therefore they are not opressing or destroying any religion.

Sure, I conceded and you won.

I admitted that my statement is poor taste for most part.

but... attacking on Christianity as retaliation for attacking on homosexuality in the past is understandable and it is not my concern.

It is all about Steinhauer.
 
that would be incorrect.

Josh Duggar's father brought in a family friend (State Trooper) to have a talk with Josh. And that state trooper did not report it to police department. That is a pretty serious dereliction and that's probably because he was a pedophile.

So it was reported .... your point is?
 
So it was reported .... your point is?

no it was not reported. that's why there was no official investigation launched on this matter until this State Trooper was arrested.

this took over 3 years for authorities to launch investigation and unfortunately the statute of limitation had already expired.

my point is - you're downplaying this issue.
my point is - both the church elder and state trooper failed to report the matter immediately and officially.
my point is - I'm disturbed by the thought that you're supporting a sexual predator all because he's a religious man.
 
no it was not reported. that's why there was no official investigation launched on this matter until this State Trooper was arrested.

this took over 3 years for authorities to launch investigation and unfortunately the statute of limitation had already expired.

my point is - you're downplaying this issue.
my point is - both the church elder and state trooper failed to report the matter immediately and officially.
my point is - I'm disturbed by the thought that you're supporting a sexual predator all because he's a religious man.

You just said they reported it but the trooper didn't press charges.

Because he was a pedophile? what? That doesn't even make any sense.

So, did they report it, or did they not report it? If the State Trooper knew why he was talking to Josh, then the Duggars reported it.

Now, why would I want to downplay something that a teenager did 13 years ago? I mean gosh, I will stop what I am doing right now and give my complete and total attention to this matter right away!!! :roll:

Especially since this is a TV show I don't even watch ...
 
You just said they reported it but the trooper didn't press charges.
no they did not report it. only that a child abuse hotline was called which then reported to police department. calling in a family friend (a cop) to have a talk with Josh is not the same as reporting it.

Because he was a pedophile? what? That doesn't even make any sense.
what do you think why he did not report it to police department? because he was probably a pedophile at that time.

So, did they report it, or did they not report it? If the State Trooper knew why he was talking to Josh, then the Duggars reported it.
see above. he came in as a family friend, not a cop.

since you're still hooting around "reported reported reported".... then where's the police report by that State Trooper? where? where's the formal investigation?

Now, why would I want to downplay something that a teenager did 13 years ago? I mean gosh, I will stop what I am doing right now and give my complete and total attention to this matter right away!!! :roll:

Especially since this is a TV show I don't even watch ...
because many sexual predators, rapists, and pedophiles began at young age.... do you think it's normal for a teenager to do something heinous like Josh Duggar?
 
no they did not report it. only that a child abuse hotline was called which then reported to police department. calling in a family friend (a cop) to have a talk with Josh is not the same as reporting it.


what do you think why he did not report it to police department? because he was probably a pedophile at that time.


see above. he came in as a family friend, not a cop.

since you're still hooting around "reported reported reported".... then where's the police report by that State Trooper? where? where's the formal investigation?


because many sexual predators, rapists, and pedophiles began at young age.... do you think it's normal for a teenager to do something heinous like Josh Duggar?


First things first.

It was reported. It was dealt with. 13 years ago.

Although it may be true that many sexual predators, rapists, and pedophiles begin at an early age - it begs the question - was it reported? was it dealt with? at the time it happened like with Josh Duggar (which was 13 years ago)?

Again, if a State Trooper was talking to Josh Duggar, and knew why he was talking to him, then the Duggars reported his behaviour. Period. End of discussion.
 
First things first.

It was reported. It was dealt with. 13 years ago.

Although it may be true that many sexual predators, rapists, and pedophiles begin at an early age - it begs the question - was it reported? was it dealt with? at the time it happened like with Josh Duggar (which was 13 years ago)?

Again, if a State Trooper was talking to Josh Duggar, and knew why he was talking to him, then the Duggars reported his behaviour. Period. End of discussion.

ok. since you've said first things first.... yes let's go with the very first thing. a father found out about it. did nothing about it. and then later found out that he did it again and again and again. there you go.

even though you've omitted a lot of important details but if that's how you see it, ok. moving on.
 
ok. since you've said first things first.... yes let's go with the very first thing. a father found out about it. did nothing about it. and then later found out that he did it again and again and again. there you go.

even though you've omitted a lot of important details but if that's how you see it, ok. moving on.

We will just have to disagree that his father "did nothing about it" as you have said.
 

You can't compare Hitler to LGBT people today - a lot of questions and different time.

http://mic.com/articles/41125/was-adolf-hitler-gay-maybe-says-new-evidence-but-does-it-matter

Most historians see Hitler as heterosexual, anyway.

Fact, there were a lot of gay people imprisoned and executed during Nazi Germany, also LGBT people were abused and misused.

It looks like you are devaluing and desecrating the LGBT communities, also it seems like you are supporting FRC, AFA and other hate groups due to Nazi statement about homosexuality.
 
Back
Top