- Joined
- Jul 26, 2009
- Messages
- 19,035
- Reaction score
- 8
shame that we can't have an honest intellectual discussion with open mind. oh well.

shame that we can't have an honest intellectual discussion with open mind. oh well.
With self defense, you can legally meet force with equal force. Martin had skittles and his fist. Minding his own business, walking home. Zimmerman stalked him- with a gun for an extended period of time.
If Trayvon beat him, it was Trayvon acting in self defense of this nut job who thinks he's a cop. Zimmerman had no reason to draw his weapon- Martin didn't have one.
Put yourself in Martin's shoes for a minute and think about it. Wouldn't you be a bit fearful too?
We don't know the full circumstances of how exactly it all went down prior to the shooting. I will wait for the investigators to do their jobs. One thing that doesn't help, and this is rather suspicious, is for the media to call Zimmerman a "white hispanic."
I agree Kokonut, that's why I said, "if he beat him"... What we do know for sure, is that Zimmerman followed/stalked him for a period of time, with a gun, after he had been directed to stop. We also know that Martin is dead because of Zimmerman's actions.
That isn't disputed...
I agree Kokonut, that's why I said, "if he beat him"... What we do know for sure, is that Zimmerman followed/stalked him for a period of time, with a gun, after he had been directed to stop. We also know that Martin is dead because of Zimmerman's actions.
That isn't disputed...
Well first, part of the duty of neighborhood watch is to keep an eye on strangers. So stalking doesn't really apply.
As for "with a gun" all that we know based on the facts is that he was carrying a gun. It's unclear how or when the gun was introduced into the situation.
How did you know that Zimmerman drew his gun when he confronted Trayvon?With self defense, you can legally meet force with equal force. Martin had skittles and his fist. Minding his own business, walking home. Zimmerman stalked him- with a gun for an extended period of time.
If Martin beat him, it was Martin acting in self defense of this nut job who thinks he's a cop. Zimmerman had no reason to draw his weapon- Martin didn't have one.
Put yourself in Martin's shoes for a minute and think about it. Wouldn't you be a bit fearful too?
How did you know that Zimmerman drew his gun when he confronted Trayvon?
More hyperventilating...which is sad....
Spike Lee tweeted the wrong address — twice — and instead put an elderly couple at risk:
PICKET: Spike Lee re-tweets incorrect address of Trayvon Martin shooter - Washington Times
Hopefully Spike and others involved will be arrested anytime soon. They are more dangerous than Zimmerman and Trayvon.
I'm not concerned with whatever media says because they're free to say whatever. I mainly look at police reports, John's statement to police, 911 transcripts, witnesses' testimonies, homicide detective's statement, Zimmerman's arrest record, and some.We don't know the full circumstances of how exactly it all went down prior to the shooting. I will wait for the investigators to do their jobs. One thing that doesn't help, and this is rather suspicious, is for the media to call Zimmerman a "white hispanic."
I'm glad to see somebody here has a common sense.... something that Zimmerman did not have.I agree Kokonut, that's why I said, "if he beat him"... What we do know for sure, is that Zimmerman followed/stalked him for a period of time, with a gun, after he had been directed to stop. We also know that Martin is dead because of Zimmerman's actions.
That isn't disputed...
That is terrible!More hyperventilating...which is sad....
Spike Lee tweeted the wrong address — twice — and instead put an elderly couple at risk:
PICKET: Spike Lee re-tweets incorrect address of Trayvon Martin shooter - Washington Times
More hyperventilating...which is sad....
Spike Lee tweeted the wrong address — twice — and instead put an elderly couple at risk:
PICKET: Spike Lee re-tweets incorrect address of Trayvon Martin shooter - Washington Times
Last night I read one article that said there is a new eyewitness, a 13 yrs old kid who saw the same thing as the first witness, "John" who saw TM on top of GZ while beating him up and GZ screaming for help. Sorry that I can't find that article now. My browser deletes history, cookies ,etc automatically after I close it. However I will keep looking for it.
The point of this is that GZ was telling the truth.Interesting, supposing that there are indeed two witnesses who saw the same thing. Yet, I'm more interested on what investigators have to say based on the facts they've gathered. It's best to stay neutral than to play pretend investigator, and be the judge, jury and executioner. :/
The point of this is that GZ was telling the truth.