- Joined
- Apr 27, 2007
- Messages
- 69,284
- Reaction score
- 142
Riiiight. And then you would complain that assumptions are being made that all parents have guns in the home.
better than asking us.
Riiiight. And then you would complain that assumptions are being made that all parents have guns in the home.
Don't you think it's possible for a parent to accidentally drop his/her baby?
Your hyperbole makes no sense. I don't follow. One resorts to using rhetoric hyperbole when one is losing his case.:
If a parent accidentally drops a 10 day old infant, who is not even capable of struggling against the parent's grip, then that parent's parenting skills definately need to be looked at. You think a person who drops a 10 day old infant is a safe parent?
better than asking us.
so it points to child abuse?
The doctor can have a discussion about gun safety without asking if the parents own guns. Children might be exposed to guns other than just thru their parents.Asking does open the door to discussion about gun safety.
To whom does it not apply? Any child can be exposed to a gun at any time, any place.So, pediatricians should be doing a discussion of gun safety with parents even when it does not apply.
Um, if that were a problem, then why did doctors start including it on their long list of questions? I thought the child's welfare came first? No?Okay. And we'll see the cost of examination go way up and the time of service go way down.
Which is it? Concern for the safety of all children?Yeah, makes much more sense then just asking a simple question to see of the discussion applies.
Why are you so concerned about questions?
It certainly points to neglect and endangerment. And that makes a 10 day old infant extremely unsafe. They cannot do anything to protect themselves from their parent's failure to behave responsibly and safely in their care of them.
Unless there's been a formal complaint made, or the household is already under social services supervision, there's zero reason for any social worker to know what you have in your house....What's the harm of a social worker knowing what content you have in your house?
a correction question is - why are you do you feel a need for doctors to ask us about guns without "probable cause"?
I have no problem with doctors asking us if they feel their patients are in danger.
Do you have a problem with doctors TELLING us instead of ASKING us?
Unless there's been a formal complaint made, or the household is already under social services supervision, there's zero reason for any social worker to know what you have in your house.
Now we are arguing whether a parent who drops a newborn is a good parent. Geeze! Some people should never have kids.:roll:
Are you saying a social worker should make a visit to every household that owns a gun?So, we just wait until the kid is shot, and then worry about it.
in this case..... it was a cephalohematoma.
Maybe she freaked out and became overly concerned when she noticed a bump on head after dropping baby when it's not really dropping. I mean this kind of concern is normal especially for first-time mom, right?
So, we just wait until the kid is shot, and then worry about it.
Are you saying a social worker should make a visit to every household that owns a gun?
If not, then what are you saying? Why are you equating a social worker visit with kids getting shot?
And, in this case, a mother reported that her 10 day old infant "suffered a fall". That in and of itself is cause for concern, whether there was a visable bump on his head or not.
I guess we just wait until she puts the kid in a too hot bath and burns it before we intervene.:roll:
A parent dropping a newborn is not an "Oh, well" situation.
right. like I said - we have laws to punish AFTER the incidents. One can go to jail for it so if one does not want to go jail, one should ensure that it should not happen.
Common Sense. I see that you see a need for us to be told what to do and what not to do?