'Company Policy: We are not hiring until Obama is gone'

[saywhatkid]

I am pretty sure it would be a safe bet that if you cannot understand how to use the word "behooves" then you do not fully understand the implications of what this judge had to say.

But please .... continue grasping at straws, it is quite amusing to watch

What, no quotes?

 

[jillio]

I am pretty sure it would be a safe bet that if you cannot understand how to use the word "behooves" then you do not fully understand the implications of what this judge had to say.

But please .... continue grasping at straws, it is quite amusing to watch

You might want to keep in mind that Jiro was using "behooves" correctly. You were not.

But, really, I wouldn't go in the direction of insulting anyone's intelligence, if I were you, given the outlandish claims you have made regarding your own that can easily be refuted. Just sayin....you might want to stay away from that topic.

The topic of health care reform is much safer for you.

 

[TXgolfer]

I have already spent enormous amounts of time on AD debunking these absurd claims about health care reform by the conservative fear mongers with actual and specific excerpts from the bill. I see no need to do it again. Those that are determined to remain ignorant, will remain ignorant.

Not in this thread

http://www.alldeaf.com/war-political-news/86579-26-states-join-obama-health-care-lawsuit-fla-6.html

nor this thread

http://www.alldeaf.com/war-political-news/76669-health-care-control-people-13.html

in fact your answers stay the same year after year

Search feature.

http://www.alldeaf.com/1639186-post361.html

 

[Buffalo]

I am curious about Looman.... if Obama got the second term and the economy got better..... Would Looman still refuse to hire?? even if his business is brisk???

 

[Steinhauer]

You might want to keep in mind that Jiro was using "behooves" correctly. You were not.

But, really, I wouldn't go in the direction of insulting anyone's intelligence, if I were you, given the outlandish claims you have made regarding your own that can easily be refuted. Just sayin....you might want to stay away from that topic.

The topic of health care reform is much safer for you.

So says the the professor whom is continously proven wrong time and time again ... :roll:

I guess if I am liberal enough, I can get my PhD too

 

[Steinhauer]

Not in this thread

http://www.alldeaf.com/war-political-news/86579-26-states-join-obama-health-care-lawsuit-fla-6.html

nor this thread

http://www.alldeaf.com/war-political-news/76669-health-care-control-people-13.html

in fact your answers stay the same year after year




http://www.alldeaf.com/1639186-post361.html

You keep forgetting something TXGolfer. Jillio claims to know more about gun safety than all U.S. Government Agencies combined.

She has memorized, word for word, the entire Obamacare policy. She knows more about it than Federal Judges, and even .... Obama.

Her intellect knows no limits. If you don't believe me, just ask her.

edit: now where is that sarcasm smiley?

 

[Jiro]

So says the the professor whom is continously proven wrong time and time again ... :roll:

I guess if I am liberal enough, I can get my PhD too

but Sowell has ph.d too and he's conservative.

 

[Jiro]

I am pretty sure it would be a safe bet that if you cannot understand how to use the word "behooves" then you do not fully understand the implications of what this judge had to say.

But please .... continue grasping at straws, it is quite amusing to watch

thesaurus -

Main Entry: behoove  [bih-hoov] Show IPA
Part of Speech: verb
Definition: be necessary, proper
Synonyms: be expected, be fitting, be incumbent upon, be needful, be one's obligation, be required, be requisite, be right, befit, beseem, owe it to, suit

as I have demonstrated before, "behoove" is typically used with positive tone... which is same as "beneficial".

but, I don't know - if it behooves you to think I am mocking those who criticize Sowell, I wasn't - I was pointing out they had political reasons for doing so.

that's why we have many words for same thing but the only difference is how it is used. In this case, you used "behoove" incorrectly.

 

[Jiro]

So you see what I am saying then.

yes I do and I can see why you have a great difficulty in grasping this complexity.

I know because I did too and it took me a while to digest it and it was beginning to make sense. Again - I've said that I don't largely agree with Obamacare but it is better than what we have now. At this rate, Americans will no longer be able to giveth because more and more Americans are getting sicker and at same time - poorer... which means it's going to cost us a great deal of money.

Simple Concept - when carpooling, the more people you have in your van, the cheaper it is to pay for toll/gas cost. when several passengers are sick, cost goes up and rest of the passengers have to pay more.

 

[TXgolfer]

yes I do and I can see why you have a great difficulty in grasping this complexity.

I know because I did too and it took me a while to digest it and it was beginning to make sense. Again - I've said that I don't largely agree with Obamacare but it is better than what we have now. At this rate, Americans will no longer be able to giveth because more and more Americans are getting sicker and at same time - poorer... which means it's going to cost us a great deal of money.

Simple Concept - when carpooling, the more people you have in your van, the cheaper it is to pay for toll/gas cost. when several passengers are sick, cost goes up and rest of the passengers have to pay more.

Meh, I merely commented on your incorrect statement.

Personally, I would argue that it is you having trouble grasping the complexity. The ramifications go far beyond "sicker" and "poorer". But no need to quibble. Our opinions are noted throughout the many threads, now we get to sit back and which things unfold. Eventually one of us will get to say "I told you so".

 

[Jiro]

Meh, I merely commented on your incorrect statement.

Personally, I would argue that it is you having trouble grasping the complexity. The ramifications go far beyond "sicker" and "poorer". But no need to quibble. Our opinions are noted throughout the many threads, now we get to sit back and which things unfold. Eventually one of us will get to say "I told you so".

yep. this is where we'll simply agree to disagree and just

btw - loser pays for beers

 

[Steinhauer]

thesaurus -



as I have demonstrated before, "behoove" is typically used with positive tone... which is same as "beneficial".



that's why we have many words for same thing but the only difference is how it is used. In this case, you used "behoove" incorrectly.

As you might have noticed ( but highly doubt ) it would have benefited you to have cast might <<<< Iphone spell check - damn you! comments in a negative light. Hence, behoove was used properly.

 

[Jiro]

As you might have noticed ( but highly doubt ) it would have benefited you to have cast might comments in a negative light. Hence, behoove was used properly.

oh well. some people ask me why do I bother talking to a wall.

 

[Steinhauer]

oh well. some people ask me why do I bother talking to a wall.

You might want to ask the forum shrink why you talk to walls.

 

[saywhatkid]

So says the the professor whom is continously proven wrong time and time again ... :roll:

I guess if I am liberal enough, I can get my PhD too

If you were moderate, you might think for yourself. Then your PhD would be earned.

 

[jillio]

Not in this thread

http://www.alldeaf.com/war-political-news/86579-26-states-join-obama-health-care-lawsuit-fla-6.html

nor this thread

http://www.alldeaf.com/war-political-news/76669-health-care-control-people-13.html

in fact your answers stay the same year after year



http://www.alldeaf.com/1639186-post361.html

Oh, well. Guess you haven't looked hard enough. He who wants to be informed will look for answers. He who wants to remain ignorant and argumentative won't.

There are several members here who will remember the threads and the fact that sections of the legislation was posted. I have better things to do with my time than to look information up for someone simply because they have an argumentative streak and like to troll. If you had ever shown any indication that you had any intention of actually reading and discussing the material presented, it would be one thing. But when information is presented that shows where you are mistaken, you reply with a "Shrug" and then run off to another thread to find something else to troll about. Ateempting to discuss anything with someone like you is a waste of time and effort.

 

[jillio]

I am curious about Looman.... if Obama got the second term and the economy got better..... Would Looman still refuse to hire?? even if his business is brisk???

Probably not. He's as hypocritical as the rest of them, I'm sure. They take advantage of what will benefit them, and complain at the same time.:roll:

 

[jillio]

oh well. some people ask me why do I bother talking to a wall.

Endless hope. Not always a bad thing. In this case, probably undeserved, though.:P

 

[jillio]

You keep forgetting something TXGolfer. Jillio claims to know more about gun safety than all U.S. Government Agencies combined.

She has memorized, word for word, the entire Obamacare policy. She knows more about it than Federal Judges, and even .... Obama.

Her intellect knows no limits. If you don't believe me, just ask her.

edit: now where is that sarcasm smiley?

Wow, dude, exaggerate much? Wait...I know the answer to that one. You exaggerate everything, including that 164 IQ. Maybe if you started telling the truth instead of purposely exaggerating and blowing out of proportion, you would have some credibility.

I'm not the one that claimed to have an IQ of 164. You did. And then you conveniently disappeared for a few days when you were called on it, thinking everyone would just forget about it.

BTW...where is that sheriff and that state highway patrolman you were going to have come on the forum to get your back? And what year was it that Newt taught your history class?

You are pathetic.

 

[jillio]

So says the the professor whom is continously proven wrong time and time again ... :roll:

I guess if I am liberal enough, I can get my PhD too

No, Steiny, you have to be smart enough. It has nothing to do with political persuasion.