- Joined
- Sep 14, 2006
- Messages
- 14,491
- Reaction score
- 11
No, Steiny, you have to be smart enough. It has nothing to do with political persuasion.
You don't need an IQ of 164 for that either.
No, Steiny, you have to be smart enough. It has nothing to do with political persuasion.
Probably not. He's as hypocritical as the rest of them, I'm sure. They take advantage of what will benefit them, and complain at the same time.:roll:
nar·cis·sism [nahr-suh-siz-em] Show IPA
noun
1.
inordinate fascination with oneself; excessive self-love; vanity.
2.
Psychoanalysis . erotic gratification derived from admiration of one's own physical or mental attributes, being a normal condition at the infantile level of personality development.
jillio, your picture should be beside this definition in the dictionary
nar·cis·sism [nahr-suh-siz-em] Show IPA
noun
1.
inordinate fascination with oneself; excessive self-love; vanity.
2.
Psychoanalysis . erotic gratification derived from admiration of one's own physical or mental attributes, being a normal condition at the infantile level of personality development.
jillio, your picture should be beside this definition in the dictionary
nar·cis·sism [nahr-suh-siz-em] Show IPA
noun
1.
inordinate fascination with oneself; excessive self-love; vanity.
2.
Psychoanalysis . erotic gratification derived from admiration of one's own physical or mental attributes, being a normal condition at the infantile level of personality development.
jillio, your picture should be beside this definition in the dictionary
You don't need an IQ of 164 for that either.
That was my feeling, too. I think I will watch him when the economy improves under Obama - I hope I will remember to check him out by then.
Show me in the Obama health care reform bill where businesses can't drop existing employee healthcare coverage if they decide they can no longer afford it thus putting their employees on Obamacare.
Oh, well. Guess you haven't looked hard enough. He who wants to be informed will look for answers. He who wants to remain ignorant and argumentative won't.
There are several members here who will remember the threads and the fact that sections of the legislation was posted. I have better things to do with my time than to look information up for someone simply because they have an argumentative streak and like to troll. If you had ever shown any indication that you had any intention of actually reading and discussing the material presented, it would be one thing. But when information is presented that shows where you are mistaken, you reply with a "Shrug" and then run off to another thread to find something else to troll about. Ateempting to discuss anything with someone like you is a waste of time and effort.
nar·cis·sism [nahr-suh-siz-em] Show IPA
noun
1.
inordinate fascination with oneself; excessive self-love; vanity.
2.
Psychoanalysis . erotic gratification derived from admiration of one's own physical or mental attributes, being a normal condition at the infantile level of personality development.
jillio, your picture should be beside this definition in the dictionary
Asking someone to back up their claims isn't trolling...
Jillio is doing an excellent job of pushing your buttons. She obviously is getting onto your nerves.
I think I'll make a note to do just that.
I would if I could trust myself to remember that guy.
Show me in the Obama health care reform bill where businesses can't drop existing employee healthcare coverage if they decide they can no longer afford it thus putting their employees on Obamacare.
The information is there in the archived threads.
And, the motive for asking someone to back up their claims can most certainly be trolling. Your motives are apparent.
My motive is clearly to determine the accuracy of your claim.