'Company Policy: We are not hiring until Obama is gone'

Because the health care reform bill has safeguards written into it that actually prevent it.

I have to ask: have you even read the legislation? Given some of the arguments you are using, I get the feeling that you haven't, and are just repeating what you have heard from someone else.

I know Jiro has read it. I know I have read it. I know a couple of others on this forum have taken time to read it. I'm just curious as to whether you are one of them.

I've read some of it but I will admit I didn't read all of it.
 
So...the Fed's can't actually giveth anything because they haveth nothing except that which they taketh making it quite impossible for them to giveth more than they taketh :cool2:

Dude, you keep running in circles like that, and you are going to fall off your chair.
 
I've read some of it but I will admit I didn't read all of it.

You are still ahead of most. I'm sure you will remember the discussion about 3 years ago, where actual sections of the reform were used to show where people here were under serious misperceptions regarding what the reform provided for. You know, back during the idiocy of the 'death panel" scare and such.
 
Dude, you keep running in circles like that, and you are going to fall off your chair.

imager.php
 
I'm not sure what you're saying.

The Fed giveth... and the Fed taketh. We pay in exuberant amount of taxes and what we get? minimal or nothing at all.

Did you think I was saying we should give nothing or something?

with Obamacare, the Feds giveth more than they taketh away.

*shrug*
 
You are still ahead of most. I'm sure you will remember the discussion about 3 years ago, where actual sections of the reform were used to show where people here were under serious misperceptions regarding what the reform provided for.

Yes, I remember.
 
You are still ahead of most. I'm sure you will remember the discussion about 3 years ago, where actual sections of the reform were used to show where people here were under serious misperceptions regarding what the reform provided for. You know, back during the idiocy of the 'death panel" scare and such.

Gotta love Palin for her FUD approach. :roll:
 

right. If you're sick, we will cover you because once you get better, you will be able to continue to giveth. any problem with that?

No work-eth, No giveth.
No giveth, No taketh.

that's why at this current pace (pre-Obamacare), our social security fund will not be able to giveth what the Feds taketh from me.
 
well - would love to continue this lovely conversation but I'm off to billiards! hope I won't get mugged and shot in Queens.... and get screwed by my medical insurance :wave:
 
well - would love to continue this lovely conversation but I'm off to billiards! hope I won't get mugged and shot in Queens.... and get screwed by my medical insurance :wave:

Be safe! Eight ball or nine ball?

And you are correct...going to play billiards in Queens could easily be seen as a pre-existing condition putting you at risk. Claim denied!
 
Because the health care reform bill has safeguards written into it that actually prevent it.

Care to back this claim up with facts?


I have to ask: have you even read the legislation? Given some of the arguments you are using, I get the feeling that you haven't, and are just repeating what you have heard from someone else.

I know Jiro has read it. I know I have read it. I know a couple of others on this forum have taken time to read it. I'm just curious as to whether you are one of them.

I don't claim to have read the entire health care bill but I have researched it extensively for my blogs. I doubt seriously the claims by any who states they have read all of it.
 
Care to back this claim up with facts?

Read the bill. It's in there.


I don't claim to have read the entire health care bill but I have researched it extensively for my blogs. I doubt seriously the claims by any who states they have read all of it.

Maybe if you had, you would not be asking people to back things up with facts that are clearly contained in legislation.

Just because you don't have the patience to wade all the way through it, or get bored before you get through it, or whatever your excuse is for not reading it all, doesn't mean that others cannot and do not, take the time to be fully informed about the issues. **shrug**
 
right. If you're sick, we will cover you because once you get better, you will be able to continue to giveth. any problem with that?

No work-eth, No giveth.
No giveth, No taketh.

that's why at this current pace (pre-Obamacare), our social security fund will not be able to giveth what the Feds taketh from me.

So you see what I am saying then. :)
 
Maybe if you had, you would not be asking people to back things up with facts that are clearly contained in legislation.

It's your claim....


Just because you don't have the patience to wade all the way through it, or get bored before you get through it, or whatever your excuse is for not reading it all, doesn't mean that others cannot and do not, take the time to be fully informed about the issues.

I still doubt it. No offense.
 
It's your claim....




I still doubt it. No offense.

I have already spent enormous amounts of time on AD debunking these absurd claims about health care reform by the conservative fear mongers with actual and specific excerpts from the bill. I see no need to do it again. Those that are determined to remain ignorant, will remain ignorant.

It doesn't surprise me in the least that you would doubt it. You seem to suffer under the misperception that your experience is universal.
 
in case you don't understand what it means.... it's the judge's opinion and that he's saying legislators need to reconvene and discuss further. Read 4th paragraph and therein. maybe read whole thing before you talk to me? I'm beginning to think Cain will think you're a buffoon.

Meanwhile, entire Obamacare is still on-going which will take effect as of 2014.

I am pretty sure it would be a safe bet that if you cannot understand how to use the word "behooves" then you do not fully understand the implications of what this judge had to say.

But please .... continue grasping at straws, it is quite amusing to watch :giggle:
 
Back
Top