Born in the USA?

Status
Not open for further replies.
because the purpose of America is to be free from socialism/communism/monarchy/etc. To have your own wealth reaped in from your own hard work. That was one of Founding Fathers' goals. Remember Boston Tea Party? If you see nothing wrong with socialism - then move to Europe.

I believe Macian lives in Scotland.
 
I believe Macian lives in Scotland.

oh no wonder. they wouldn't understand. once they taste American capitalism & freedom... there's no going back :laugh2:

That's why we have so many illegal immigrants
 
oh no wonder. they wouldn't understand. once they taste American capitalism & freedom... there's no going back :laugh2:

That's why we have so many illegal immigrants
like yourself, unless of course you're american indian then you have my full apoligies.
but for your last comments, come on, get real, give a logical explanation, you lot sit on yer arse till it knocks on your door, the rest of the world has vision to try and stop it in its tracks.
had it not been for your senate, we would have took out the republican guard last time in iraq, it was your lot that pulled the plug as we encircled them, if the troops were allowed to continue, tens of thousands of Iraqis would be alive and hundreds of american troops as well as british and all our allies,if we could have took out the republican guard, saddam could never have raised a second army, but no, you had your oil, so STOP, and yet you still think the west owes you, isnt it about time you tried to understand your foreign policy? and I say this as an ally, and I do mean that, 3 generations of my family have fought alongisde the US as I would have had i not been deaf. but your last comments and so many more along the lines leaves me feeling you are so out of touch with the rest of the world, its scary
 
I believe Macian lives in Scotland.

you are right banjo mate, but if any americans want to shoot the monacrchy I will happily load the gun:D royals are english, they aint ours and never will be
 
Speaking of now... Obama and McCain hasn't started. Eugenics in my country under Carter, Regan, Bush, Clinton and Bush...

Here in this country, when??

Yes, eugenices happened outside my country because they killed our people and threatened our people with possibility. Presidents of the US have rights to protect their people.
Eugenics gained some popularity in the USA during the early 20th century. It wasn't always called eugenics by those who practiced it but it was nonetheless.

Eugenic Archives: "Alexander Graham Bell as Chairman of the Board of Scientific Directors of the Eugenics Record Office," Eugenical News (vol. 14:8)

Margaret Sanger and Sterilization

BlackGenocide.org | The Truth About Margaret Sanger

Abortion - A Liberal Cause? (Margaret Sanger and Eugenics)
 
like yourself, unless of course you're american indian then you have my full apoligies.
but for your last comments, come on, get real, give a logical explanation, you lot sit on yer arse till it knocks on your door, the rest of the world has vision to try and stop it in its tracks.
had it not been for your senate, we would have took out the republican guard last time in iraq, it was your lot that pulled the plug as we encircled them, if the troops were allowed to continue, tens of thousands of Iraqis would be alive and hundreds of american troops as well as british and all our allies,if we could have took out the republican guard, saddam could never have raised a second army, but no, you had your oil, so STOP, and yet you still think the west owes you, isnt it about time you tried to understand your foreign policy? and I say this as an ally, and I do mean that, 3 generations of my family have fought alongisde the US as I would have had i not been deaf. but your last comments and so many more along the lines leaves me feeling you are so out of touch with the rest of the world, its scary

uh... because we're not a bloodthirsty killer like you. We do not need to take out whole Republican Guards. They have families, you know. USA let them live because they can be used for reconstruction purpose. And beside... the 2nd army? uh... are you kidding me? it was not even at full strength. They were flat-ass broke and hungry. It was all smoke and cover. It was an easy surrender this time.

oh btw - I'm Korean. My birth country is forever in USA's debt for their involvement in Korean War and is a strong & close partner of USA.
 
because the purpose of America is to be free from socialism/communism/monarchy/etc. To have your own wealth reaped in from your own hard work, not to share my money for others. That was one of Founding Fathers' goals. Remember Boston Tea Party? If you see nothing wrong with socialism - then move to Europe.

and capatilsm works so well eh, thats why yer economy is booming and not brining down the rest of the world markets through greed , perhaps if the money stayed out of fat cats pockets and were distributed fairly amongst the population we' woudlnt all be going down the plughole
 
:lol: Bush did the same thing is attack other countries.... Wasn´t Bush born in USA???? And yet the Americans allowed him lead their country into another war....:lol:

At least there wasn't a 'holocaust' in this country....

Are you saying that you fear to have another Hitler if outsider become US Citzeon and moviate to US polities?

Look at Austrian Arnold Schwarzenegger as the Governor of CA. He doing his job as the Governor pretty good... He could be president of USA but they can´t accept him because they fear that Arnold might be second Hitler... Is it the reason?

Reba, wise? :lol: No, parniod!!!! :lol:

:roll: He isn't American-born and therefore disqualifies him for being a President. :roll:
 
and capatilsm works so well eh, thats why yer economy is booming and not brining down the rest of the world markets through greed , perhaps if the money stayed out of fat cats pockets and were distributed fairly amongst the population we' woudlnt all be going down the plughole

nothing is forever. There's up and down and still.... we're rich. take a look at our defense budget. :cool2:
 
you are right banjo mate, but if any americans want to shoot the monacrchy I will happily load the gun:D royals are english, they aint ours and never will be

Braveheart!
 
uh... because we're not a bloodthirsty killer like you. We do not need to take out whole Republican Guards. They have families, you know. USA let them live because they can be used for reconstruction purpose. And beside... the 2nd army? uh... are you kidding me? it was not even at full strength. They were flat-ass broke and hungry. It was all smoke and cover. It was an easy surrender this time.

oh btw - I'm Korean. My birth country is forever in USA's debt for their involvement in Korean War and is a strong & close partner of USA.

you seriously think if you did nothing, saddam wouldnt have evntually aquired nuclear weapons?
why should we be bothered anyway, they all hate amrcia a hundred times more than they do us, if they aquired them it would be you that got hit, like the towers, why do ye think it wasnt the uk> alot closer, but its you lot they hate, all the arabs and terrorists, we only got a few buses hit on the back of you, so why do you think you are fighting our war? we have been fighting them against your policies for years, yet when you are asked to support them you say, " oh yeah ask us to fight your battles" ok against my arguement say your right, then explain why they attack you long before they even think about us, we only get attacked for showing support for you after 9/11, when you go to war it's never support it's always, oh yeah here we go again they need us to sort our mess, get real mate, its your countries policies thats causing it all
 
might i ask whats wrong with sharing wealth reba> rather than hoarding it?
What about earning wealth? What's wrong with encouraging people and providing opportunities for working for increased wealth? How about lowering the restrictions that prevent more people from earning their own wealth?

Accumulating wealth and either spending it, giving it away, saving it, or investing it is not the same as "hoarding" it. Even if the wealthy just stick their money in the bank, it is there to provide capital when a middle class person needs to get a mortgage for a house. Wealthy people can use their money to hire more employees, order more goods and services (which increases employment opportunties), donate to the arts, start new businesses, etc.

i find it very strange people's misconceptiosn of socialism, proably because of propaganda from our governments for years. can you explaili why you don't agree or like socialism, without quoting comminism which has been implanted in us?
I don't agree with the government forcing us to give up our hard earned dollars to others. I believe the income tax should be abolished, and a federal consumption tax should be established in its stead.

How I got that opinion was from listening and reading various viewpoints, combined with experience.

Our early Pilgrim settlers tried a commune-istic society the first year they arrived in America. They quickly discovered that it didn't work. They almost died off from that system. They switched to a capitalistic mode, and began to thrive and prosper.
 
I'm afraid not.

If "nobody saw it coming" with Hitler, what makes you think people will "see it coming" with Obama? I tried to point it out here, and still "no one sees it coming." Some people are in such denial that they won't see the freight train "coming" until it hits them.

You cannot seriously believe that?
 
What about earning wealth? What's wrong with encouraging people and providing opportunities for working for increased wealth? How about lowering the restrictions that prevent more people from earning their own wealth?

Accumulating wealth and either spending it, giving it away, saving it, or investing it is not the same as "hoarding" it. Even if the wealthy just stick their money in the bank, it is there to provide capital when a middle class person needs to get a mortgage for a house. Wealthy people can use their money to hire more employees, order more goods and services (which increases employment opportunties), donate to the arts, start new businesses, etc.


I don't agree with the government forcing us to give up our hard earned dollars to others. I believe the income tax should be abolished, and a federal consumption tax should be established in its stead.

How I got that opinion was from listening and reading various viewpoints, combined with experience.

Our early Pilgrim settlers tried a commune-istic society the first year they arrived in America. They quickly discovered that it didn't work. They almost died off from that system. They switched to a capitalistic mode, and began to thrive and prosper.

so basically whats mine is mine, if i employ ten other people pay them little, keep the rest of the money for my pool, holiday villa, whilst other people cant even afford food to survive then thats ok?
I understand where yer coming from reba but im sorry i dont agree with it.
as for the record i am an employer, with my own business, before anyone points it out lol
but i am and always will be a socialist, i believe in sharing and not in greed, it's just so many small minds are still living in the dark ages and see socialism as commonism, and not sahring
 
Braveheart!
"By oppression's woes and pains,
By your sons in servile chains,
We will drain our dearest veins,
But they shall be free!

Lay the proud usurpers low!
Tyrants fall in every foe!
Liberty's in every blow! --
Let us do or die!"
 
"By oppression's woes and pains,
By your sons in servile chains,
We will drain our dearest veins,
But they shall be free!

Lay the proud usurpers low!
Tyrants fall in every foe!
Liberty's in every blow! --
Let us do or die!"

hear hear, : )

ps! my ancestor signed your declaration of independence(think his name is about third sig), we celts,the Scots and irish gave you freedom, yet we havent managed to aquire ours, yet.
but, it was also 2 scots that started the klu klux klan, for which I can only apoligise:mad:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top