*scratch my head* I thought you know.
I thought you know that a lot of children suffered because a lot of people are hurried to become parents without think twice or have to become parents accord their belief. No, I would not provide the links to prove you since the many threads, the creators created with links over children abuses from websites. Next time, please pay more attention to any threads about children abuse, starvation, etc.
The parents should think twice either they can acheive to cope family life or not or give baby up a new home or abort a fetus to aviod to make future child suffer.
Of course I have noticed lots of postings to that opinion but that's not the same as proving a correlation between non-aborted babies and the ills of the world. The number of threads and bloggings about a subject don't make a postulate so.
It´s not fair for child to suffer like this.
Life isn't fair, that's true.
for positive my thought.
Welcome.
No, you don´t get it.
I only support abortion is:
severe birth defects like this
severe birth defects - Google Bilder
To remove dead fetus from mother´s womb.
To remove dead baby at partial birth
Unwanted pregnancy when they use sex protection like Birth Control
Remove fetus to save mother´s risk life
and total against to consider abortion as a birth control is:
Just simple abort dozen of times as a birth control like what Russians did in Russia. They doesn´t bother to use sex protection because they know abortion is the solution to rid of fetus which is not right.
I know the difference. But it's still judging. What's so awful about judging? If judging is done impartially, based on facts, with pure motivation, what's so wrong? There's no need to be defensive about it.
Women,
Infants, and
Children = WIC
"WIC provides Federal grants to States for supplemental foods, health care referrals, and nutrition education for low-income pregnant, breastfeeding, and non-breastfeeding postpartum women, and to infants and children up to age five who are found to be at nutritional risk."
WIC
I thought Medicaid is for low income employees/workers/unemployees.
This explains some of the groups covered by Medicare:
</title> <title>Mandatory Eligibility Groups
Huh? I can't give you an answer for every company that exists in America. It depends on the company. Each company has a different plan with a different insurance company. It all depends on what that company has set up with that particular insurance company, and which plan that particular employee has enrolled with. There is no answer that covers every possibility. Some coverage ends immediately, some 30 days later, 60 days later, or some continues or can be converted if the enrollee maintains payments; there are many different situations. I can't answer them all.
Sorry if that's not good enough for you.
You tell me. I said that they can apply for Medicaid. You tell me why they can't.
Yes I has to agree with you on this but I personally think it´s really no good for child to look up parent´s role like this.
I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean. The father should pay for the child's support, even if the man is not a good role model. Role model, role schmodel--he needs to pay up.
It´s up to woman either she is strong enough to cope her child or not. You can´t force the woman to keep a baby and get that man to pay support when the woman decide to not keep her baby.
I didn't say anything about forcing a woman to keep the baby. If she wants to give it up for adoption, that's fine. But either way, the man must pay support until such time that the baby is legally adopted by another couple.
Look at an example of a guy, I know at long time ago, want to have his girlfriend to keep his baby and willing to be responsible for them but his girlfriend decides to abort it. What would you say ? I cannot do anything to make him or her because it´s between them, not us.
That has nothing to do with child support. You're changing the subject.
Of course you can't do anything legally about another person's decision. You don't have the legal authority.
If the woman decides to keep her baby and want that man to pay support then I support her.
If the woman decides to not keep her baby and do not need that man to pay support then I still support her.
If woman want abort or give her baby up for adoption and man don´t want abort and adoption. It´s between them, not me.
I talking about legal and moral responsibility of the
father for the child. The guy should pay. The law doesn't require your approval for that. It involves the man, the woman, the baby, and the law. It doesn't involve you or me.