You got that right Jillio! It is sadly a racial thing at times and social economic statuses.
As for having to call in contributions or whatever else, in a such a fair system why would we need to?
Doesn't hurt to have help from extra friends.
You got that right Jillio! It is sadly a racial thing at times and social economic statuses.
As for having to call in contributions or whatever else, in a such a fair system why would we need to?
*United Nations????
Have you spent time trying to make arrangements for interviews, meetings, trying to collect evidence, testing DNA--which takes time, etc.?
Once you have experience the above, then you will understand that it takes time.
Afterall do you want your lawyer to come prepared or not when you have your day in court?
You also have to look at one's record, if they were on probabtion or not, as well as outstanding warrants.
All does add up for additional prison time.
Doesn't hurt to have help from extra friends.
I would prefer that my lawyer come prepared. However, how prepared that lawyer is most often is dependent upon how much he is being paid. IMO that is the wrong criteria for effective legal defense.
And, your reply validates my claim that the legal system is ineffective.
And all of that information can be obtained in a 30 second computer search.
Which is simply more support for the unfairness of the justice system.
And who is more likely to have a criminal record? A black man or a white man? The answer is a black man. Is that becasue African Americans are more inherently criminal? No, it is because of the inequities in arrest, prosecution, and conviction between races.
Likewise, madated sentences for crack coacaine and powder cocaine exist regardless of the defendent's prior record. And the mandated minimum for crack cocaine is much higher than the mandated minimum for powder cocaine. That is why the American prison system has been ordred to reduce the sentences, and release thousands, based on inequity in sentencing between the two forms of coacaine.
Why is the brother helping his sister urinate? That should be the responsibility of the parents not the sibling!
A brother helped his sister urinate is not belongs to form of sex offender. He is an innoncent to my eyes. I personally see nothing wrong with helping silbings urinate.
I can see why he was charged with incest and rightfully so.
It´s not just incest but sex offender as well. What a paraniod, *shake my head*
You also have to look at one's record, if they were on probabtion or not, as well as outstanding warrants.
All does add up for additional prison time.
It´s a feeble excuse!!!!!!!!!!!!
I would suggest you to rent DVD "A time to Kill". Its about racist... Justice system support white mostly than black people.
A brother helped his sister urinate is not belongs to form of sex offender. He is an innoncent to my eyes. I personally see nothing wrong with helping silbings urinate.
It´s not just incest but sex offender as well. What a paraniod, *shake my head*
The court doesn't look at it that way. The court will ask: why didn't mom/dad help the daughter urinate? Is mom/dad/ shirking their responsibility of being parent?
The problem now a days is that people don't want to be held accountable for their own actions.
The simplest solution is don't break the law.
The system is not racist.
OJ Simpson got a fair trial, Rodney King got a fair trial.
I would suggest you to rent DVD "A time to Kill". Its about racist... Justice system support white mostly than black people.
It´s a feeble excuse!!!!!!!!!!!!
I would suggest you to rent DVD "A time to Kill". Its about racist... Justice system support white mostly than black people.
That's because George Holliday had a video recorder on hand to tape the beating on March 3, 1991 without the tape, King wouldn't have got a fair trial.
And for OJ Simpson, you think Nicole Simpson and Ronald Goldman got fair justice? There was so much DNA evidences proved that he was guilty but the cops didn't do procedures properly and one of them lied, Simpson took advantage and beat the system that's why he got away with the murders..
Good movie but that is all it is: a movie.
The system is not racist.
OJ Simpson got a fair trial. Rodney King got a fair trial.
A movie that tells a story about Canton, Mississippi in the 1960's,the Civil Rights era. The court system was merely reflecting America's mood at the time.
To base your opinion of one movie that happend in America during the 1960's on it's court system is ridiculous.
How would you like it if I based my opinion of Germany on "Schindler's List"?
I don't as it merely is a one small snapshot of one's country history.
They got a civil trial and the court ordered OJ to pay the families.
Will they get the money? Probably not.
To defend your position using O.J.Simpson and Rodney King is the same thing.