Watch Your Kids Numb Nuts!

Status
Not open for further replies.
To Everyone:

What if that was your child?
I didn't bring my child to a zoo , the first time she went was on school trip and I went along to watch my child . I hate zoos they're too depressing to me.
 
You can even see Harambe peeping around the corner at the screaming crowd like "Y'all are cray cray ... throwing this boy down here!"

And if it was my kid that was down there, please shoot me for being a negligent parent.
 
Another expert is stating that Harambe was not a threat to the child:


http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/gorilla-trying-kill-protect-boy-8087981
Dr Bethell said: “He was clearly being protective towards the boy.

“There were no signs of the gorilla being aggressive in the sense that he wanted to hurt the boy or anything like that.

“The biggest threat to the boy I would say is obviously when the gorilla moved and dragged him, that could have caused some harm, but the gorilla’s body language is definitely protective.”
 
You can even see Harambe peeping around the corner at the screaming crowd like "Y'all are cray cray ... throwing this boy down here!"

And if it was my kid that was down there, please shoot me for being a negligent parent.

We know that Harambe is conservative republican so it is outrageous to kill him!!! :lol:
 
Another expert is stating that Harambe was not a threat to the child:


http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/gorilla-trying-kill-protect-boy-8087981

ill believe that expert truly believes what he states the second i see him let his four year old kid play with a caged gorrila alone.
until then
hes full of it

i ask that for anyone who believes caged gorrials are Not a threat.
have your kids go play with one then, alone in a cage with no supervision and lets chat..

wont be holding my breath though

anyway
how fast do you think that "non threat" could change?

how fast do you think a caged human could change between states of not being a threat to states of being a threat?
give it some thought


so would you let a caged human treat your child like that?

after all caged humans arent threats either right?

besides a non domesticated caged animal 8 to 9 times the strength of a healthy human adult male, not being a threat, to a 4 year old child
do you have a better alternative the zoo could of used but didtn?

as for me
i wouldn't let any human treat my child that way caged or not

since some on this thead are using terms strictly kept for humans for the gorrila such as "murdered" or "executed" or even "crying"..so on
i hold gorrilas to the same bargain.

"put your hands on someone else kid, drag the child around like a rag doll, though water along concrete....refuse to give the kid up....
your getting your ass shot!!"

but
since gorrilas are non threats
how about all zoos open up their cages for the non threatening beasts to mingle with the crowds?

if not why not?
 

do you really believe koko the gorrila knows sign language?

i would love to have a conversation in sign with koko

i guarantee you
that gorrila wont know what to sign or even what to try to sign with some one who is truly trying to communicate with her in sign

since the gorrila incident iv been getting this whole gorrilas know sign language bullshit..i remember in the early 90s when theat movie congo came out we got it then too.....
i'm surprised at finding Deaf seemingly caught up in that diea...
but its a strange world

its simply not true

parots do not know english
they can speak english
they do not know english

do they?

but since gorrilas now have "spokemans" "talking" in to us "sign language"

and since koko the gorrila used the sign for crying...

and since we know for a fact gorrilas, koko included do not posses tear ducts to actually cry....
then we should ask this spokeman...koko

in sign of course
where did he get the idea of crying from and to explain why he is using it? when he himself can never ever ever do what he is signing. cry. (shed tears)

what would the koko the gorrilas response in sign be to that question?

i dunno
i expect spokeman to be conversant in all the angles wthat would or could be tossed at them from assholes like me

but i do know if your going to be a spokeman and "talk" to us in sing language...better get your statements in order koko

the "im just a gorrila" isnt an excuse the big boys accept
its a human world
and we humans treat eachother worse then hungry dogs....
since your a caged gorrila koko...im sure you already know this. and have spent some time on your speech in sign to make us humans aware of it...


if we are going to use human language for these creatures, and essential give them human qualites
even human work positions (spokeman)

then as humans they should be treated

bullets in the head, and all

i wouldnt of been opposed to killed gorrila being sent up for some hard time in a hard yard with hard humans.
kidnapping and assault charges get you some tough time

certainly would be no zoo...
given the strength differences...one may at first think thats a bad bargain for the humans
truth

the gorrila wouldn't stand a chance

eat all the bananas in the world...a gorrila will always and ever be just a gorrila
and faced against a team of cutties like us,

we know how that ends
 
do you really believe koko the gorrila knows sign language?

and since koko the gorrila used the sign for crying...

and since we know for a fact gorrilas, koko included do not posses tear ducts to actually cry....
then we should ask this spokeman...koko

in sign of course
where did he get the idea of crying from and to explain why he is using it? when he himself can never ever ever do what he is signing. cry. (shed tears)

what would the koko the gorrilas response in sign be to that question?
From dictionary.com
to utter inarticulate sounds, especially of lamentation, grief, or suffering, usually with tears.

So yes, a gorilla can cry even if it does not have tear ducts.
 
From dictionary.com
to utter inarticulate sounds, especially of lamentation, grief, or suffering, usually with tears.

So yes, a gorilla can cry even if it does not have tear ducts.


thats a human replying
i want to know what koko thinks about it, after all koko signed it, his the spokeman
 
The article states, they were afraid the tranqulizer wouldnt work fast enough and the gorrilla would become confused, possibly killing or falling on the child in the moat killing both as they would both drown. Or he would start throwing the child due to confusion. What if they did hit the child with the dart... Thats an overdose already since its for a 400# gorilla, Have you ever had major surgery and they put you out... remember going out and waking up.... Yeah I was confused too. Took a bit to get my bearings together.
Some people said they would jumped if that was their child , that is suicide! The whole is tragic and should never had happen all b/c of some parents being careless with their child ! The boy kept saying he wanted to go in the water , the mother should had moved her kid away as soon he said this not take her eyes off him !
 
Sounds and looks like everyone involved has to shoulder the blame: parents for not keeping an eye on the child and the zoo for not making the enclosure secure or keeping up with the maintenance of the zoo to ensure the publics safety.
 
Sounds and looks like everyone involved has to shoulder the blame: parents for not keeping an eye on the child and the zoo for not making the enclosure secure or keeping up with the maintenance of the zoo to ensure the publics safety.

it is singular
parent
only one parent was present

it matters when judging or blaming people
 
ill believe that expert truly believes what he states the second i see him let his four year old kid play with a caged gorrila alone.
until then
hes full of it

i ask that for anyone who believes caged gorrials are Not a threat.
have your kids go play with one then, alone in a cage with no supervision and lets chat..

wont be holding my breath though....
Exactly.
 
it is singular
parent
only one parent was present

it matters when judging or blaming people
Okay, the parent and the zoo share responsibility or blame.
 
Some people said they would jumped if that was their child , that is suicide! The whole is tragic and should never had happen all b/c of some parents being careless with their child ! The boy kept saying he wanted to go in the water , the mother should had moved her kid away as soon he said this not take her eyes off him !
I would if it was my son, I can move and reason much better than my kids... Distraction is the key here..... not fighting.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top