for proving my point.
In case you still don't understand, I'll point it out for you
I'll point it out again
You do realize that in English the phrase "higher standard
and ethics" means
both higher standards and higher ethics, right? So you did say that the prosecutor has higher ethics than the defender. Maybe you didn't mean it, but it is what you said, and I can only discuss what you actually say, not what you meant to say but did not communicate.
The problem with your statement is that the prosecutor only has higher standards of proof to meet
IN COURT. In statements made to the media, that does not apply.
Both prosecutor and defender have precisely the same standard of ethics, but their public statements are just that- public statements.
And so the prosecutor's statement to the media shouldn't have any influence on what anybody thinks. It's just a media statement, PR, publicity, politics- it is not a statement made under oath, in the courtroom, and it is not held to that standard.
Prosecutors often make statements in public that they would not and will not make in court. So do defenders.
