Should a pedophile be granted parental visits?

souggy said:
I already gave you a few starting points to begin with.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I saw that.:wave: And those findings hold true for the U.S., as well. People are just soooo confused.
 
Daredevel7 said:
I'm surprised that no one mentioned "why not ask the child who is visiting the parent?".

Generally, Id say hell, no. It isn't like s/he will NEVER get a chance to interact with their child. 1) The pedophile may not be in jail forever and can still visit his/her child when they get out. 2) The child eventually will be old enough to make his/her decision to see his/her parent. This is simply a side effect of being caught doing a crime. Or perhaps it IS part of the punishment.

However, I'd allow for exceptions for the extreme cases. I don't like to assume that ALL cases are bad. Such as the 18 year old being caught with a 17 year old. But I would want supervision AT ALL TIMES.

One thing for sure, if the child IS the victim him/herself, then that's just freakin' insane. WTF?
Click to expand...

In real life, the child is asked, and the child's feelings as well as the psychological and emotional ramifications of any decision is considered carefully before a decision is made regarding visitation and what restrictions will be in place. This is not a decision just made by some family court judge in isolation. The fact is, many experts are called to give input, and the decision is one made after all that info has been received and all affected parties have been interviewed.

Only people posting in this thread are making a decision in isolation and without sufficient information.
 
Glenn said:
He's butthurt about something that has nothing to do with this thread. He's gotta find a way to lash out. This thread is just a convenient way for him to do so.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I know. It's a personal thing with him. Could use some coping skills training.:cool2:
 
jillio said:
I see. Nothing intelligent to add, so you just throw around the ad hominems. You really do have issues.
Click to expand...

Are you diagnosing online? :lol: if you read the post again you might see how it was funny.
 
Glenn said:
He's butthurt about something that has nothing to do with this thread. He's gotta find a way to lash out. This thread is just a convenient way for him to do so.
Click to expand...

read the post again....it was the wording.... :lol:
 
jillio said:
Yeah, I know. It's a personal thing with him. Could use some coping skills training.:cool2:
Click to expand...

You paranoid? Oops now I am diagnosing online. :lol:

it was the wording...... Then again maybe I know the truth about something. Too :dunno: *shrug*
 
backpain-1292835351.jpg
 
jillio said:
This hasn't got anything to do with religion. This is about legal and psychological ramifications.
Click to expand...

And yet you are picking on me, SecretBlend posted first and Yiz respond and I added to Yiz. Yet you did not jump on them about religion. As I said, you fight but you don't fight fair.
 
TXgolfer said:
You paranoid? Oops now I am diagnosing online. :lol:

it was the wording...... Then again maybe I know the truth about something. Too :dunno: *shrug*
Click to expand...

Nope. Needs some coping skills training is not a diagnosis.:cool2: Just an observation of the obvious.
 
rolling7 said:
And yet you are picking on me, SecretBlend posted first and Yiz respond and I added to Yiz. Yet you did not jump on them about religion. As I said, you fight but you don't fight fair.
Click to expand...

Wah, wah, wah.
 
Back
Top