Omar Mateen. What do we know about him? He was an American citizen. 29 years old. Born and raised in America. New Yorker native. He was married to a very beautiful girl from NJ in 2009 and then divorced her in 2011 in Florida. His ex-wife stated that he was a very private person, abusive, and mentally unstable. He was not religious either.
we shouldn't put much faith in what ex wives state about their exs..but if true, did the ex wife go tot he state with her claims? did she inform the police of the abuse? do we have any evidence besides her word?
Omar was employed as a juvenile prison security guard by G4S Secure Solutions since 2007 - one of the largest private security firm in America (I'm guessing that by tomorrow morning when the stock market opens, the parent company of G4S will take some hit). Perhaps that's where he received firearm training from - not ISIS or any terrorist organization. He had a criminal justice degree from a local college. He aspired to be a police officer. He was just as American as just like any of us.
Late in his 20’s (few years ago)... he started to appear in FBI's radar in 2013 for a very faint tiny weak string just because of some hateful comment he made to his coworkers relating to terrorists... and again in 2014 about a possible tie with Floridian suicide bomber who went to Syria - just because Omar expressed a sympathy for him. The government - Homeland Security, FBI, and bunch of other 3-letter acronyms had found zero (direct and indirect) connection between Omar and any terrorist organization. He had never traveled to any Muslim country nor received any instruction/training from any terrorist organization.
Like any other American citizens… Omar was entitled to his Amendment Two. He was able to LEGALLY acquired weapons because he was not a criminal, he had a clean history, and PLUS he had a security officer license. HOWEVER - Omar was on FBI’s terror watch list for some time. President Obama had once again proposed a bill to prohibit any weapon sales to anyone on terror watch list but the Republican Party has repeatedly rejected that bill. President GWB first proposed this bill and Republican Party had rejected it. And because his ex-wife did not report domestic violence to police... Omar's background record remained clean and clear.
alright
Now... let's do some math. Take out the "Muslim name" from this equation. Take out “ISIS”. What do you get? You get hateful people with hateful views toward a specific group of people - Jewish people, gay people, abortion doctors, Muslim people, and bunch more. In this case, hateful people like Omar Mateen and James Howell hated gay people. Who is James Howell? the one who just got arrested for attempting to massacre people at gay pride parade in LA. Police discovered explosive devices, chemical weapon, and multiple assault weapons in his car.
bud why take out his name? why cover up simple facts ;like the killers stated allegiance to a foreign state? why ignore that he stated he was killing for their cause and that they in turn actually stated he did and did it for them by claiming responsibly?
did james howe state his allegiance to a firgn state? and that he was going to kill for them?
if not
tossing him into this is just purposely muddying the discussion (and yes i understand why you wish too)
So what is this about? Not ISIS. Not Muslim people. Not terrorism. This is about an attack on GLBT community - an act of hate by Omar Mateen and James Howell. There is a huge difference between people who have received training and instruction from terrorist organization and people who “sympathized” and/or follow terrorist organization for their hateful ideology and this is what we call a lone wolf…. and a terrorist wannabe.
So is this a case of a lone wolf self-radicalizing or a mentally unstable lunatic with deranged hateful views - a ticking bomb? I believe it's the latter.
if this was not about isis can you pls explain to me why the killer stated he did it for them and why they in turn accepted it and claimed responsibility?
thank you
what is the actual difference between those who get training from terrorist groups and those who sympathize besides the actual level of training?
i think its rather rich to claim this guy who just pulled the worst mass shooting in america and stated he did it for a foreign state is a terrorist wannabe.
given the terror his actions has spread.
call him what you will
a wannabe this guy most certainly was not
id agree with you if, and that is if, his actions didnt spread any terror.
so
has any terror been caused by this?
if this was done by someone who stated he did it for the klan and then the klan state yes indeed he did it for us..
would the press, you and other be as dismissive?