Surely that must be again ADA or something as its refusing her rights
I guess you'll have to choose what's best for her.
Is she learning much in her signing school?
Iv seen her videos! She's a great signer!!
My friends were CI users from 3 years old and they were signers. Maybe you could keep her where she is if shes so happy unless the school wasnt teaching her age appropriate stuff
Yeah but at least at the mainstream school you could make it in her IEP or something to get the staff to teach sign to the children so they can communcate with Miss Kat.
Yes......it's really the quality of speech therapy rather then the quanity of speech therapy. If she's developing speech skills, she'll continue developing them. She won't just stop developing them one day. She may never have speech skills on a par with a hearing kid.....but then again, many oral dhh kids don't have spoken language skills on a par with hearing kids.I'd keep her in the signing school and get her some outside regular speech therapy and play dates with children to develop her spoken skills.
She provided a link to Listen Up, and there were some synopsis of these cases listed on their homepage. However, they all differ from the case she relays to us about her daughter.
put her in an oral placement then give her an 'terp
but that would just mess up everything the school stood for. I mean, they started their school to make kids use verbal communication and nothing else. If they brought a terp, it goes against why the school was started in the first place. It's kinda like expecting christian schools to have atheist teachers to teach against Christianity. I can see why an oral school would tell the parent that they have to mainstream her kids if she wanted a terp at the same time she want her child to use verbal communication. she probably would be happy if the public school did offer a deaf class while being mainstreamed in other classes with a terp.
But if she wants her constantly exposed to spoken language and to also have ASL mainstreaming with an interpreter would completely meet her desires.
I am not arguing if it is best for the child, just that it is exactly what the mother has repeatedly asked for. And she would probably get a different speech therapist in that setting who would not use sign.
It is what she has been describing all along.
But if she wants her constantly exposed to spoken language and to also have ASL mainstreaming with an interpreter would completely meet her desires.
I am not arguing if it is best for the child, just that it is exactly what the mother has repeatedly asked for. And she would probably get a different speech therapist in that setting who would not use sign.
It is what she has been describing all along.