Oral school

Is it ok?

  • Yes

    Votes: 19 29.7%
  • No

    Votes: 31 48.4%
  • Maybe or sometimes

    Votes: 14 21.9%

  • Total voters
    64
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ouch! that's gonna leave a mark. :Ohno:

No. It is ok. She is almost exactly like my father. Just with more modern technology.:wave:
 
No. It is ok. She is almost exactly like my father. Just with more modern technology.:wave:

I was being truthful, you know nothing about my child, her life, or her experience. You have not walked her path. Now, If someone wants to explain their experience, than I am more than willing to listen and learn and gain knowledge and hopefully use the things I learn and apply them to my child's life. But no one here "has the corner" on what it is like to be Deaf. Everyone has a different experience.
 
I was being truthful, you know nothing about my child, her life, or her experience. You have not walked her path. Now, If someone wants to explain their experience, than I am more than willing to listen and learn and gain knowledge and hopefully use the things I learn and apply them to my child's life. But no one here "has the corner" on what it is like to be Deaf. Everyone has a different experience.

I understand that. And I know you have the best intentions and I am like your nightmare of what might happen to your child.

But you are not going to know the result of your choices until she grows up.
 
But you are wrong as the abstract use of the word you are attempting to describe is not its literal meaning. Instead of inventing some feeble and tortured attempt at pretzel logic why not just admit you misused the term and move on.

BTW would love to see your proof that ASL programs help literacy.

What the abstract use of the word have to do with this is beyond my sanity.

Moving on...

So you want proof... Tell me why you are interested in this, and I may give you it. All I need is a rational reason that makes sense.
 
I understand that. And I know you have the best intentions and I am like your nightmare of what might happen to your child.

But you are not going to know the result of your choices until she grows up.

The only thing that would bother me is if she grew up bitter and angry, so yeah, sometimes you are exactly my nightmare.

My dream is that she grows up perfectly bilingual. She signs beautifully, speaks as well as she can and is happy and healthy. That she has a family that she loves and a job that she either does well or really likes (can you have both?) and that she can fully reach her potential in everyway.
 
I was being truthful, you know nothing about my child, her life, or her experience. You have not walked her path. Now, If someone wants to explain their experience, than I am more than willing to listen and learn and gain knowledge and hopefully use the things I learn and apply them to my child's life. But no one here "has the corner" on what it is like to be Deaf. Everyone has a different experience.

Most parents say their deaf child is unique and different, like you do here. Still the experiences among their children are similar enough to make labels like Deafhood acknowledged in a large scale. What's wrong with this picture?
 
The only thing that would bother me is if she grew up bitter and angry, so yeah, sometimes you are exactly my nightmare.

My dream is that she grows up perfectly bilingual. She signs beautifully, speaks as well as she can and is happy and healthy. That she has a family that she loves and a job that she either does well or really likes (can you have both?) and that she can fully reach her potential in everyway.

But I have what you want for her.

And I still can say that the choices made for me were not the best, and the path would have been easier by a different route.
 
Most parents say their deaf child is unique and different, like you do here. Still the experiences among their children are similar enough to make labels like Deafhood acknowledged in a large scale. What's wrong with this picture?

Each human being is different. Just because my husband and I grew up hearing in similar place at the same time, doesn't mean we had the same life.

The reason that many Deaf community people have the similar stories, is because they sought out the Deaf community. It is a place that they find people who understand them and support them, because they understand what they have been through.

For example, if you go to a Vet support group you are going to hear similar stories about PTSD. Does that mean ever veteran has PTSD? No. It means that vets who seek out veteran support groups do. So, does every deaf person who grew up orally, hate it and then learn ASL and join the Deaf community? No. But does who did hate it, do.
 
But I have what you want for her.

And I still can say that the choices made for me were not the best, and the path would have been easier by a different route.

And what route would that be?? Using ASL??? DONE!
 
Each human being is different. Just because my husband and I grew up hearing in similar place at the same time, doesn't mean we had the same life.

The reason that many Deaf community people have the similar stories, is because they sought out the Deaf community. It is a place that they find people who understand them and support them, because they understand what they have been through.

For example, if you go to a Vet support group you are going to hear similar stories about PTSD. Does that mean ever veteran has PTSD? No. It means that vets who seek out veteran support groups do. So, does every deaf person who grew up orally, hate it and then learn ASL and join the Deaf community? No. But does who did hate it, do.

Agree. Many vets got PTSD by the way.
 
The reason that many Deaf community people have the similar stories, is because they sought out the Deaf community. It is a place that they find people who understand them and support them, because they understand what they have been through.

For example, if you go to a Vet support group you are going to hear similar stories about PTSD. Does that mean ever veteran has PTSD? No. It means that vets who seek out veteran support groups do. So, does every deaf person who grew up orally, hate it and then learn ASL and join the Deaf community? No. But does who did hate it, do.
Good point. On the other hand you must understand the reason why some deaf people are so against oral method, not only from what they had went through themselves, they want to prevent other deaf from going through the similar, more like watching out for others because they care.
 
Good point. On the other hand you must understand the reason why some deaf people are so against oral method, not only from what they had went through themselves, but they want to prevent other deaf from going through the similar, more like watching out for others because they care.

I second that.
 
Good point. On the other hand you must understand the reason why some deaf people are so against oral method, not only from what they had went through themselves, they want to prevent other deaf from going through the similar, more like watching out for others because they care.

And I totally get that. But they can't assume that every single person and every single program ia exactly like what they experienced.
 
What the abstract use of the word have to do with this is beyond my sanity.

Moving on...

So you want proof... Tell me why you are interested in this, and I may give you it. All I need is a rational reason that makes sense.

Since you are moving on, I won't touch your assumption about your sanity.

I'm not into playing your little games, if you want to provide it fine, if not fine also.
 
Since you are moving on, I won't touch your assumption about your sanity.

I'm not into playing your little games, if you want to provide it fine, if not fine also.

It's great to see that you aren't playing my little games. Since you would "love to see" proof, I will be kind enough to provide you with some. As we aren't playing games, I expect you to read through those evidences, and make corrections where you were wrong. Happy to help you :wave:
 
Proof that ASL programs help literacy:

Basil, K., & Quigley, S. (1977). The influence of
certain language and communication environments
in early childhood on the development
of language in deaf individuals.
Journal of Speech and Hearing Research,
20, 95–107.
Blumenthal-Kelly, A. (1991). Fingerspelling interaction:
A set of deaf parents and their deaf
daughter (pp. 62–73). In C. Lucas (Ed.),
Sociolinguistics in Deaf communities. Washington,
DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Bouvet, D. (1990). The path to language: Bilingual
education for deaf children. Clevedon,
England: Multilingual Matters.
Bowe, F. (1991). Approaching equality. Silver
Spring, MD: TJ Publishers.
Butler, K., & Prinz, P. (1998). ASL proficiency and
English literacy acquisition: New perspectives.
Topics in Language Disorders, 18(4),
30–46.
Cawthon, S. (2004). Schools for the deaf and
the No Child Left Behind Act. American Annals
of the Deaf, 149(4), 314–323.
Center for ASL/English Bilingual Education and
Research (CAEBER). (2002). Star schools
handout of bilingual methodology. Unpublished
manuscript, New Mexico School for
the Deaf, Santa Fe.
Charrow, V. (1981). The written English of deaf
adolescents. In M. F. Whiteman (Ed.), Writing:
The nature, development, and teaching
of written communication (Vol. 1, pp.
179–187). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cummins, J. (1976). The influence of bilingualism
on cognitive growth: A synthesis of research
findings and explanatory hypotheses.
Working Papers on Bilingualism, 9, 1–43.
Cummins, J. (1979). Linguistic interdependence
and the educational development of
bilingual children. Review of Educational
Research, 49, 222–251.
Cummins, J. (1981). The role of primary language
development in promoting educational
success for language minority students.
In Schooling and language minority students:
A theoretical framework (pp. 3–49).
Los Angeles: Evaluation, Assessment, and Dissemination
Center, California State University.
Cummins, J. (2003). BICS and CALP. Retrieved
March 12, 2007, from http://www.iteachilearn.
com/cummins/bicscalp.html
DeLana, M. (2004). The impact of ASL/English
bilingual education on public school students
who are deaf/hard-of-hearing. Unpublished
master’s thesis, Lamar University,
Beaumont, TX.
DeLana, M., & Skarp. P. (2004). Unlocking syntax:
Lessons in American Sign Language and
English. Unpublished manuscript.
Fernandes, J. (1997). Deaf education: A state
of emergency (a Sharing Ideas series paper).
Washington, DC: Gallaudet University,
Laurent Clerc National Deaf Education Center.
Retrieved March 12, 2007, from http://
clerccenter.galladet.edu/products/index.html
Freeman, Y., & Freeman, D. (1998). ESL/EFL
teaching: Principles for success. Portsmouth,
NH: Heinemann.
Gallaudet Research Institute (2005). Annual
survey of deaf and hard of hearing children
and youth state summary report. Washington,
DC: Gallaudet University.
Hansen, B. (1994). Trends in the progress toward
bilingual education for deaf children in Denmark.
In C. Erting, R. Johnson, D. Smith, &
B. Snider (Eds.), The Deaf way: Perspectives
from the international conference on Deaf
culture (pp. 605–614). Washington, DC: Gallaudet
University Press.
Hoffmeister, R. (2000). A piece of the puzzle:
ASL and reading comprehension in deaf
children. In C. Chamberlain, J. P. Morford,
& R. Mayberry (Eds.), Language acquisition
by eye (pp. 143–163). Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum.
Holcomb, T., & Peyton, J. (1992). ESL literacy
for a linguistic minority: The deaf experience.
Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse
on Literacy. Retrieved March 12, 2007,
from CAL: Error 404
LITERACY.HTML (ERIC Document Reproduction
Service No. ED353861)
Holt, J., Traxler, C., & Allen, T. (1997). Interpreting
the scores: A user’s guide to the ninth
edition Stanford Achievement Test for educators
of deaf and hard of hearing students
(Gallaudet Research Institute Technical Report
No. 97–1). Washington, DC: Gallaudet
University.
Humphries, T., & MacDougall, F. (2000). Chaining
and other links: Making connections between
American Sign Language and English
in two types of school settings. Visual Anthropology
Review, 15(2), 84–94.
Jacobson, R. (1990). Allocating two languages as
a key feature of a bilingual methodology. In
R. Jacobson & C. Faltis (Eds.), Language
distribution issues in bilingual schooling
(pp. 3–7). Clevedon, England: Multilingual
Matters.
Johnson, R., & Cohen, O. (1994). Implications
and complications for deaf students of the
full inclusion movement (Gallaudet Research
Institute Occasional Paper No. 94–2).
Washington, DC: Gallaudet University.
Johnson, R., Liddell, S., & Erting, C. (1989). Unlocking
the curriculum: Principles for
achieving access in deaf education Washington,
DC: Gallaudet Research Institute.
Kannapell, B. (1974). Bilingual education: A
new direction in the education of the deaf.
The Deaf American 26(10), 9–15.
Knight, P., & Swanwick, R. (2002). Working with
deaf pupils: Sign bilingual policy into practice.
London: David Fulton.
Kuntze, M. (2004). Literacy acquisition and
deaf children: A study of the interaction between
ASL and written English. Unpublished
doctoral dissertation, Stanford University,
Stanford, CA.
Larson, M. (1999). Meaning-based translation:
A guide to cross-language equivalence
(2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: University Press of
America.
LaSasso, C., & Lollis, J. (2003). Survey of residential
and day schools for deaf students in
the United States that identify themselves
as bilingual-bicultural programs. Journal of
Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 8(1),
79–91.
Li, Y. (2005). The effects of the bilingual strategy
“preview, view, review” on the comprehension
of science concepts by deaf ASL/English
and hearing Mexican-American Spanish/
English bilingual students. Unpublished doctoral
dissertation, Lamar University, Beaumont,
TX.
Luetke-Stahlman, B. (1990). Types of instructional
input as predictors of reading achievement
for hearing impaired students. In
C. Lucas (Ed.), Sign language research (pp.
325–336). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University
Press.
Mayberry, R. (1989, April). Deaf children’s
reading comprehension in relation to sign
language structure and input. Paper presented
at the meeting of the Society for
Research in Child Development, Kansas
City, MO.
Mayberry, R. (1994). The importance of childhood
to language acquisition: Evidence from
American Sign Language. In J. C. Goodman &
H. C. Nusbaum (Eds.), The development of
speech perception (pp. 60–89). Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press.
Mayberry, R., Chamberlain, C., Waters, G., &
Doehring, D. (1999). Reading development
in relation to signed language input and
structure. Manuscript in preparation.
Mogford, K. (1988). Oral language acquisition in
the prelinguistically deaf. In D. Bishop, &
K. Mogford (Eds.), Language development in
exceptional circumstances (pp. 110–131).
London: Longman Group.
Moores, D., Kluwin, T., Johnson, R., Cox,
P., Blennerhasset, L., Kelly, L., Ewoldt, C.,
Sweet, C., & Fields, L. (1987). Factors predictive
of literacy in deaf adolescents (Final
Report to the National Institute on Neurological
and Communicative Disorders and
Stroke, Project No. NIH-NINCDS-83–19).
Washington, DC: National Institutes of
Health.
Moores, D., & Sweet, C. (1990). Relationships
of English grammar and communicative fluency
to reading in deaf adolescents. Exceptionality,
1, 97–106.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L.
107–110, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq. (2002).
Nover, S. (2000). The history of language planning
in deaf education: The nineteenth
century. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
University of Arizona, Tucson.
Nover, S. (2005, April). Language policy in deaf
education. Paper presented at the meeting
86of the Center for ASL/English Bilingual Education
and Research, Washington, DC.
Nover, S., Andrews, J., Baker, S., Everhart, V., &
Bradford, M. (2002). Staff development in
ASL/English bilingual instruction for deaf
students: Evaluation and impact study
(United Star Distance Learning Consortium
Star Schools Project Report No. 5). Santa Fe:
New Mexico School for the Deaf. Retrieved
March 12, 2007, from http://www.nmsd.k12.
nm.us/caeber/documents/year5.pdf
Nover, S., Christensen, K., & Cheng, L. (1998).
Development of ASL and English competence
for learners who are deaf. Topics in
Language Disorders, 18(4), 61–72.
Nover, S., & Moll, L. (1997). Cultural mediation of
deaf cognition. In M. P. Moeller & B. Schick
(Eds.), Deafness and diversity: Sociolinguistics
issues (pp. 39–50). Omaha, NE: Boys
Town National Research Hospital.
Padden, C., & Hanson, V. (2000). Search for the
missing link: The development of skilled
reading in deaf children. In K. Emmorey &
H. Lane (Eds.), The signs of language revisited:
An anthology in honor of Ursula Bellugi
and Edward Klima (pp. 435–448).
Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Padden, C., & Humphries, T. (1988). Deaf in
America: Voices from a culture. Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press.
Padden, C., & Ramsey, C. (1998). Reading ability
in signing deaf children. Topics in Language
Disorders, 18(4), 30–46.
Perfetti, C., & Sandak, R. (2000). Reading optimally
builds on spoken language. Journal
of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5(1),
32–50.
Prinz, P. (Ed.) (1998). ASL proficiency and English
literacy acquisition: New perspectives.
Topics in Language Disorders, 18(4), 30–46.
Prinz, P., & Strong, M. (1998). ASL proficiency
and English literacy within a bilingual deaf
education model of instruction. Topics in
Language Disorders, 18(4), 47–60.
Quigley, S. P., Power, D. J., & Steincamp, M. W.
(1977). The language structure of deaf children.
Volta Review, 79, 73–84.
Schildroth, A., & Hotto, S. (1996). Changes in
student and program characteristics, 1984–
85 and 1994–95. American Annals of the
Deaf, 141(2), 68–71.
Schimmel, C. S., Edwards, S. G., & Prickett, H. T.
(1999). Reading? . . . Pah! (I got it!): Innovative
reading techniques for successful deaf
readers. American Annals of the Deaf,
144(4), 298–308.
Singleton, J., Supalla, S., Litchfield, S., & Schley, S.
(1998). From sign to word: Considering
modality constraints in ASL/English bilingual
education. Topics in Language Disorders,
18(4), 16–29.
Smith, A. (2006). The performance of deaf students
on a test of American Sign Language
abilities—receptive (TASLA–R). Unpublished
doctoral dissertation, Lamar University, Beaumont,
TX.
Strong, M. (1995). A review of bilingual/
bicultural programs for deaf children in
North America. American Annals of the
Deaf, 140(2), 84–94.
Strong, M., & Prinz, P. (1997). A study of the relationship
between American Sign Language
and English literacy. Journal of Deaf Studies
and Deaf Education, 2(1), 37–46.
Supalla, S. (1994). Equality in educational opportunities:
The Deaf version. In C. Erting,
R. Johnson, D. Smith, & B. Snider (Eds.),
The Deaf way: Perspectives from the international
conference on Deaf culture (pp.
584–592). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University
Press.
 
All the proof that ASL helped with literacy skills

Flip beat me to it!
 
Hi Everyone,
I am new to this site and am excited to see the dialogue. In the early years, I was educated using sign and oral language. As I progressed to 4th or5th grade I was forced to chose: oral or sign. Choosing also dictated where I would go to school, locally or specialized. As a small child I was almost always the only child who was deaf/hearing impaired, I foolishly chose oral because I wanted to be like the "hearing kids." Little did I understand that I would never pass as a hearing child no matter how well I spoke. I paid an incredibly high price for this choice and have worked long and hard to make peace with the decision I made. Knowing what I know today, I would never force a child to have to chose one over the other, I would advocate for the use of multiple forms of communication rather than forcing one format. Forcing a child to use only one method robs the child of the opportunity to build a strong well-rounded identity. Lack of identity creates havock on self-esteem, which spirals into a painful existence. It took years to forgive myself for the choice I made and I am so thrilled to find validation in the struggles of being deaf/HOH in an environment that does not support deaf/HOH.

:gpost:
 
I understand that. And I know you have the best intentions and I am like your nightmare of what might happen to your child.

But you are not going to know the result of your choices until she grows up.

Damn! Talk about being BLUNT!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top