One dead in movie theater shooting in Florida

[Steinhauer]

If your life is important instead of jail or death so you have to let it go.

I agree with Jiro above and you have deal with it.

I already stated what I would do. The question is not about me.

 

[Foxrac]

I already stated what I would do. The question is not about me.

I hopefully that you are not doing stupid thing that end up to be convicted of manslaughter or murder and send to state prison in Georgia.

My cousin is in state prison in Georgia for burglary and possession of heroin and it is really horrible - you can get beat up in shower or bathroom everyday.

 

[Jiro]

First of all, you are jumping to conclusions again. I never stated whether or not anyone was armed. For argument's sake, lets just say everyone is unarmed. No one is carrying a firearm, a mace, a sword, a cattle prod, nunchuks, or ninja stars.

huh? you asked a hypothetical question and I gave a general-you statement - "why would you...."

Secondly, while it is not illegal to cut in line, it is an internationally recognized rule to start at the back of a line and not skip in front of people. This is also called "common courtesy" and only a child would not understand this.

right... such rule holds no legal weight and it's not worth initiating a confrontation. there will always be somebody who lacks a common courtesy but you should have a common sense to let it go because it's just not worth it.

Third, telling a person whom has violated an internationally recognized rule that they need to follow the rules is not initiating a confrontation (maybe in your line of reasoning it is, and maybe in your cultural upbringing it is).

by telling a person can lead to either a resolved situation or a hostile confrontation. that's entirely up to you, not him. how is it a difference in cultural upbringing when in fact you stated that you would just let it go? you're confusing yourself as always.

Fourth, violating a rule is initiating a confrontation. This is usually done by self centered, egotistical people who feel the world somehow owes them something and that they are "special" and above reproach.

therefore... LET IT GOOOOOOO

*falsetto voice* LIFE'S NOTTTT FFFFAAAAAIIIIRRRRRRR!!!!!!!

 

[Steinhauer]

huh? you asked a hypothetical question and I gave a general-you statement - "why would you...."


right... such rule holds no legal weight and it's not worth initiating a confrontation. there will always be somebody who lacks a common courtesy but you should have a common sense to let it go because it's just not worth it.


by telling a person can lead to either a resolved situation or a hostile confrontation. that's entirely up to you, not him. how is it a difference in cultural upbringing when in fact you stated that you would just let it go? you're confusing yourself as always.


therefore... LET IT GOOOOOOO

*falsetto voice* LIFE'S NOTTTT FFFFAAAAAIIIIRRRRRRR!!!!!!!

ah - misunderstood your use of the word "You". Sorry.

In reference to cultural upbringing, I was not intending to put you on the spot, I was implying that rude behaviour is considerably different for different cultures.

 

[Jiro]

ah - misunderstood your use of the word "You". Sorry.

In reference to cultural upbringing, I was not intending to put you on the spot, I was implying that rude behaviour is considerably different for different cultures.

*scoff* you intended to be offensive and putting me on the spot. that was your intention.

You stated that you're implying that rude behavior is considerably different for different cultures and yet............ in previous post - you've stated that it is an "internationally recognized" rule not to cut in front of people? so which one is it?

 

[Steinhauer]

*scoff* you intended to be offensive and putting me on the spot. that was your intention.

You stated that you're implying that rude behavior is considerably different for different cultures and yet............ in previous post - you've stated that it is an "internationally recognized" rule not to cut in front of people? so which one is it?

Well, I am sorry you feel that way. No, i was not intending to put you on the spot.

Here is an example of what I meant. In the south, saying "Oh, well bless your heart" does not mean what you probably think it means. It is an insult. It is a cultural difference that people from the north do not exactly catch on to at first, and usually has to be explained.

 

[Foxrac]

Well, I am sorry you feel that way. No, i was not intending to put you on the spot.

Here is an example of what I meant. In the south, saying "Oh, well bless your heart" does not mean what you probably think it means. It is an insult. It is a cultural difference that people from the north do not exactly catch on to at first, and usually has to be explained.

Is it great opportunity to get this thread locked up?

 

[Steinhauer]

Is it great opportunity to get this thread locked up?

I am not attempting to lock up a thread, no. I am attempting to clear up a misunderstanding. Is that wrong?

 

[Jiro]

Well, I am sorry you feel that way. No, i was not intending to put you on the spot.

Here is an example of what I meant. In the south, saying "Oh, well bless your heart" does not mean what you probably think it means. It is an insult. It is a cultural difference that people from the north do not exactly catch on to at first, and usually has to be explained.

lol what? you don't need to teach me or explain anything about "in the south". I've lived in the south before and I've been living in America for as long as I can remember. You're just a little conniving weasel making some racist quips.

You're not weaseling your way out of this. You've stated that you're implying that rude behavior is considerably different for different cultures and yet............ in previous post - you've stated that it is an "internationally recognized" rule not to cut in front of people? so which one is it?

 

[Jiro]

I am not attempting to lock up a thread, no. I am attempting to clear up a misunderstanding. Is that wrong?

misunderstanding? more like backpedaling.

 

[Steinhauer]

lol what? you don't need to teach me or explain anything about "in the south". I've lived in the south before and I've been living in America for as long as I can remember. You're just a little conniving weasel making some racist quips.

You're not weaseling your way out of this. You've stated that you're implying that rude behavior is considerably different for different cultures and yet............ in previous post - you've stated that it is an "internationally recognized" rule not to cut in front of people? so which one is it?

Well, that escalated quickly. You seem to attempt to put words in my mouth at every opportunity Jiro. It seems you have this inner need to lie in order to elevate yourself. My comments were neither racist or inflammatory. It is certainly true that rude behaviour is considered different for different cultures.

One thing I have noticed, is that in some cultures, LEO's are revered, while in others, they are reviled.

 

[Steinhauer]

misunderstanding? more like backpedaling.

Jiro, have you ever answered my question about why you lie, persistently, about things I have said?

 

[Jiro]

Jiro, have you ever answered my question about why you lie, persistently, about things I have said?

uh... didn't we cover that already? I'm not responsible for your inability to read.

 

[Jiro]

Well, that escalated quickly. You seem to attempt to put words in my mouth at every opportunity Jiro. It seems you have this inner need to lie in order to elevate yourself. My comments were neither racist or inflammatory. It is certainly true that rude behaviour is considered different for different cultures.

what? LOL what?????

let me repost your previous post -

First of all, you are jumping to conclusions again. I never stated whether or not anyone was armed. For argument's sake, lets just say everyone is unarmed. No one is carrying a firearm, a mace, a sword, a cattle prod, nunchuks, or ninja stars.

Secondly, while it is not illegal to cut in line, it is an internationally recognized rule to start at the back of a line and not skip in front of people. This is also called "common courtesy" and only a child would not understand this.

Third, telling a person whom has violated an internationally recognized rule that they need to follow the rules is not initiating a confrontation (maybe in your line of reasoning it is, and maybe in your cultural upbringing it is).


Fourth, violating a rule is initiating a confrontation. This is usually done by self centered, egotistical people who feel the world somehow owes them something and that they are "special" and above reproach.

so exactly how is it that not cutting in front of line is an internationally recognized rule and yet... this rude behavior is not considered rude in different culture?

One thing I have noticed, is that in some cultures, LEO's are revered, while in others, they are reviled.

irrelevant.

but are you saying we and this country should revere Curtis regardless of whose fault?

 

[Foxrac]

I am not attempting to lock up a thread, no. I am attempting to clear up a misunderstanding. Is that wrong?

I think - back in 80s or 90s, your first company to work and your boss told you that you have great opportunity to trolling, opportunity to break the LGBT event into piece, opportunity to discriminate because of race or sexual orientation, opportunity to travel over Georgia, opportunity to reword my statement that agree with you, opportunity to have a pink carpet in your bedroom and other many opportunities.

 

[Steinhauer]

uh... didn't we cover that already? I'm not responsible for your inability to read.

No, actually you never did answer that question. And about the reading comprehension .... are you not understanding how my comments were neither racist nor inflammatory? Or are you just feigning outrage for an emotional response from me?

 

[Jiro]

No, actually you never did answer that question.

You have never specified exactly which part have I lied. You have never answered any of my question. You have never addressed specifically at all. Therefore... you're just feigning a "oh poor me! I'm a victim" outrage and demanding an action from mod. I can't help you if you can't specify exactly which part. Please point it out exactly where and I'll be able to effectively answer your question to your satisfactory even though I have already answered your questions many times.

And about the reading comprehension .... are you not understanding how my comments were neither racist nor inflammatory? Or are you just feigning outrage for an emotional response from me?

About the reading comprehension... are you not understanding that Supreme Court ruling that you've repeatedly mentioned about it in this thread has never stated anything about "NO GUN ALLOWED" sign not having any legal weight?

 

[Steinhauer]

what? LOL what?????

let me repost your previous post -


so exactly how is it that not cutting in front of line is an internationally recognized rule and yet... this rude behavior is not considered rude in different culture?


irrelevant.

but are you saying we and this country should revere Curtis regardless of whose fault?

I wasn't talking about revering Curtis, I was talking about different cultural perspectives in regards to LEO's. It was just an example I was using to explain that observing different cultural perspectives on what is considered rude behaviour can also reflect on their perspectives of authority figures (like LEO's for example).

For example, if a sub culture reviles LEO's it could be for several different reasons. It could be that the LEO's that this sub-culture has been exposed to are corrupt. Or, the sub-culture is actually involved in gang activity and they see LEO's as a threat to their existence - therefore, they are reviled.

In yet other cultures where LEO's are revered, it could be that LEO's are involved in the community in outreach programs for the homeless, help save lives, etc. and they are looked upon as heroes.

All I was doing was attempting to explain that there are, indeed, different cultural perspectives in regards to rude behaviour and this explanation of how authority figures are viewed was just an extension.

 

[Foxrac]

No, actually you never did answer that question. And about the reading comprehension .... are you not understanding how my comments were neither racist nor inflammatory? Or are you just feigning outrage for an emotional response from me?

Are you serious with your statement, or you are just playing with us?

For example below.

Real Steinhauer: Shoot at someone over throwing popcorn is not smart move.

Alternate Steinhauer: Shoot at someone over throwing popcorn is justifiable for self defense under SYG.

If you are just playing with me so time to load "Real" Steinhauer.

 

[Steinhauer]

You have never specified exactly which part have I lied. giving you the post number was pretty specificYou have never answered any of my question. You have never addressed specifically at all. Therefore... you're just feigning a "oh poor me! I'm a victim" outrage and demanding an action from mod. I can't help you if you can't specify exactly which part. Please point it out exactly where and I'll be able to effectively answer your question to your satisfactory even though I have already answered your questions many times.


About the reading comprehension... are you not understanding that Supreme Court ruling that you've repeatedly mentioned about it in this thread has never stated anything about "NO GUN ALLOWED" sign not having any legal weight?

I never said the Supreme Court ruled that signs carry no legal weight. I said the Supreme Court ruled that it is an individual right to carry a firearm. It is a federal law and a federal right. I did mention that signs in Florida (I am pretty sure I was specific about this) carry no legal weight in regards to prohibiting firearms (with exemptions on places considered off limits - a movie theater not being one of them).

Any more smoke and mirrors Jiro?