Octuplets' grandmother faces foreclosure threat

sculleywr said:
Apparently you forgot to read the entire post. Go back, read my post about what she should do to redeem herself, and tell me how she is doing anything in that list? Those restrictions effectively prevent her doing what she is doing, if she follows them. Following them, she can redeem herself, AND regain the kids by earning them back and paying her debts to both her mother and the public. Tell me how that allows her to keep doing what she is doing?

Also, if it were impossible to take care of 14 kids, the Duggars would never be possible. Obviously, impossible is not.
Click to expand...

Exactly! :)
 
dreama said:
Because they seem to care more about money then they do about people I think.
Click to expand...

If there is no money left to pay for education becuase of situations like these, then it is more than enough reason to be upset about.
 
Daredevel7 said:
You're forgetting one simple fact: Duggars's kids vary in age. There is a HUGE difference between taking care of 8 babies at once and 8 kids that vary 0-14 (or whatever) years old. Kids become more self sustaining as they get older. I am willing to bet that some of Duggars' older kids help out with the housework or maybe even babysit the little ones.
Click to expand...


U are very right on the spot! My daughter is 11 years old and my son is 3...she helps out with taking care of my son sometimes and that relieves some of the pressure. I cant imagine taking care of 8 3-year olds now.

To the others:

Why do u think daycares licenses require a ratio of 3 children of the same age to 1 adult?
 
sculleywr said:
Also, if it were impossible to take care of 14 kids, the Duggars would never be possible. Obviously, impossible is not.
Click to expand...

The Duggars did it with TWO PARENTS, and some of their oldest children help take care of their youngest siblings. The oldest child is 18 or older, I believe.

Nadya has 14 kids ALL UNDER THE AGE OF SEVEN! And she is ALONE. Her mother was helping out with the oldest 6 kids, but now the mother doesn't want to help Nadya with any of the kids anymore. She's tired and sick of Nadya's irresponsible behavior. So, she is ALONE. One woman taking care of FOURTEEN KIDS UNDER THE AGE OF SEVEN, including EIGHT FRAGILE BABIES! THAT IS IMPOSSIBLE.

If you truly think one woman can take care of FOURTEEN kids all under the AGE OF SEVEN including the OCTUPLETS, I dare you to go out there and take care of ALL 14 CHILDREN all by YOURSELF with NO ONE TO HELP, not even Nadya. I DARE YOU TO DO THAT! Then come back and tell us how you did it! I DARE YOU!
 
Maria said:
Like I said earlier.... She needs some HELP! You can not tell her to STOP or make/force her to have a sterlization or have her womb be removed. Her body is NOT your body. Understand ??
I am NOT goin' to say that she is bein' irresponsible. And, of course I am not goin' to agree with you on everythin' you say in your posts. I still disagree with you, period.
Click to expand...

Did you really say that?:laugh2:
 
jillio said:
You cannot, in any way, shape, or form, compare the Duggar family to this woman. To even attempt such a comparison is absurd.
Click to expand...

Well they both fit in the category of more than 11 children.:P
 
dreama said:
Because they seem to care more about money then they do about people I think.
Click to expand...

Can you please explain to me how it is one lives and raises a family without money? You either have to have your own, or you have to get it from public assistance. If you are on assistance attempting to raise your first 6, adding another 8 isn't going to certainly isn't going to stretch your budget.
 
Maria said:
Like I said earlier.... She needs some HELP! You can not tell her to STOP or make/force her to have a sterlization or have her womb be removed. Her body is NOT your body. Understand ??

I am NOT goin' to say that she is bein' irresponsible. And, of course I am not goin' to agree with you on everythin' you say in your posts. I still disagree with you, period.
Click to expand...

Nope, I can't make her get a hysterectomy, but the government CAN with a court order. I hope that will happen. So, don't tell me to understand. Capisce? :roll:

I am entitled to my opinion. And I like to think realistically and I am blunt.
 
Last edited:
jillio said:
You cannot, in any way, shape, or form, compare the Duggar family to this woman. To even attempt such a comparison is absurd.
Click to expand...

no you cant compare the Duggar family to her. the Duggar's seem to be a responsible family fulfilling a dream. shes just a fruitcake without a clue and cant tell her a$$ from a hole in the ground.
 
Daredevel7 said:
You're forgetting one simple fact: Duggars's kids vary in age. There is a HUGE difference between taking care of 8 babies at once and 8 kids that vary 0-14 (or whatever) years old. Kids become more self sustaining as they get older. I am willing to bet that some of Duggars' older kids help out with the housework or maybe even babysit the little ones.
Click to expand...

THANK YOU! :gpost:

Also, the Duggars are a two-parents family, have a job and income, have their own health insurance through the job, etc. All the children range in age from 0 to 18 or 20 (not sure how old the oldest kid is, but the oldest is no longer a minor, and is now married). They have a lot of support and lots of resource.

Nadya has NONE. She has NOTHING. BIG DIFFERENCE. I'm pretty sure the 7 year old cannot babysit the other younger kids.
 
LuciaDisturbed said:
Nope, I can't make her get a hysterectomy, but the government CAN with a court order. I hope that will happen. So, don't tell me to understand. Capisce? :roll:

You clearly do not have much reasoning abilities. We do not need your mindless drivel.
Click to expand...

Actually, no they can't. Not without serious backlash from the ACLU, but what the government CAN and SHOULD DO, is have protective services step in to moniter this family. The minute any of those isn't being cared for properly, someone should step in and remove the kids and place them in foster care.
 
Oceanbreeze said:
Actually, no they can't. Not without serious backlash from the ACLU, but what the government CAN and SHOULD DO, is have protective services step in to moniter this family. The minute any of those isn't being cared for properly, someone should step in and remove the kids and place them in foster care.
Click to expand...

Yep! I totally agree. A hysterectomy is just a little too much, even though it is technically the best solution for someone like her. I like Oceanbreeze's solution.
 
Oceanbreeze said:
Actually, no they can't. Not without serious backlash from the ACLU, but what the government CAN and SHOULD DO, is have protective services step in to moniter this family. The minute any of those isn't being cared for properly, someone should step in and remove the kids and place them in foster care.
Click to expand...

They might not care about the backlash from the ACLU in this case. We'll see.
 
After giving birth to 14 children...8 of them during the same pregnancy...she may have to end up having a hysterectomy just as a result of the damage done to herself.
 
Back
Top