if that's the case, then it's same for liberals.
That may be true, but it's more apparent when it comes to conservatives.
At least liberals believe in doing something for the first time instead of rejecting an idea before it has even been tried.
I have read and looked into Sotomayor's background. I admit that the first thing I checked was seeing her stance on 2nd Amendment because it gives me a good gauge on her overall view. She's been labeled as moderate liberal and I have no problem with that. While I'm bit icked about her stance on 2nd Amendment especially her ruling on Maloney v. Cuomo case... but I slightly concur with her ruling. I thought her interpretation about 2nd Amendment was very interesting. That shows to me that her knowledge in law, Constitution, and civil rights is very in-depth and highly qualified.
So let me extend my congratulation and support for her nomination to a seat in Supreme Court. It's about time we have somebody with a strong passion in civil rights along with common sense. Scalia, Alito, and Roberts are strong voices for Conservative views so with Sotomayor on the board - that's good to have a share of liberal and conservative views together on the bench.
GOOD LUCK SOTOMAYOR!
That may be true, but it's more apparent when it comes to conservatives.
At least liberals believe in doing something for the first time instead of rejecting an idea before it has even been tried.
Oh yeah, conservatives are really cool losers. That's why you love them! 
Boy, I love hate mails. (> . >) *be ready for dodging those mad mails*
As for the first post, I think it's... AWESOME NEWS!
Hmm... Interesting posts here. I see so different. Well, I prefer to look at their experience or background instead of look at races, genders, religions, politics, and etc etc.
My opinion, I think the background and experience are more importance than race, gender, or whatever it is. I meant, look at that amazing Soto! I personally do not care about her skin color, what's importance is... she had great experience. That's matter. I know some people are upset because of she is not a conservative, but my question is...
Why can't we give her a chance? She's worthy for Supreme Court.
for good link, Netrox.
What I "love" about conservatives is how inflated their egos are.
I had mixed emotions about that statement. But he seriously looked at me like I was some sorta of the spawn of Satan. Ironically, I actually take liberal advices and... you. 
Yep, for sure... at the last. That's why they (conservatives) are a cool loser like me. :P
*dodging your post*
Not so quite so, semi-liberal lady!
Basically, it's so easy to preach that Obama is so sexy president!
You forget the word have a new meaning for conservative: "Everyone know who we are, the medias have been painting a lovely and newly picture of us over the last eight years, mostly as the butt of all jokes or the villain in all politics. We are the famous of being racists, bigots, sexists, and/or homophobes, yet we are the most infamous political incorrectness. Hey, it's fun to read."
Oh no, not mention to that some liberals think a lot of conservatives are an evil. I remembered the last time I chatted with someone else.
Hell, I know my post is horrible.
Jiro,
When someone says something negative about a conservative, it's a stereotype, but when someone does the same to a liberal, it's truth.
I see...
Your post is evidence of the fact that conservatives cannot think logically.
Jiro,
When someone says something negative about a conservative, it's a stereotype, but when someone does the same to a liberal, it's the truth. I see...
Your post is evidence of the fact that conservatives cannot think logically.
No. I just poked at steretypo conservative. I guess you only can understand liberal jokes. 
