Obama nominates Sotomayor to Supreme Court

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hear Again said:
In every post you write in response to a law, you always find a reason why it shouldn't exist or be passed.
Click to expand...

such as?
 
Jiro said:
No thanks. That's not what the founding fathers intended to do. Neither does Sotomayor. Praise the lord that she's not as liberal as you. :cool2:
Click to expand...

You're familiar with all of Sotomayer's views to assume she is less of a liberal than I am? Thanks for the laugh Jiro. :laugh2:
 
Jiro + Hear Again =
ine2pf.gif







:popcorn:
 
Hear Again said:
You're familiar with all of Sotomayer's views enough to assume she is less of a liberal that I am? Thanks for the laugh Jiro. :laugh2:
Click to expand...

I'm afraid so. At least she doesn't want to ban alcohol, toys, cars, knife, bat, etc. :cool2:
 
Jiro said:
Well - if America were to run as according to Hear again, we would all be living in prisons in a world of control with bazillion of laws and restrictions.
Click to expand...

Laws are what keep this country safe. If we didn't have laws, we would be living in a world where everyone's safety is gravely put at risk. I'm surprised you don't understand this. It's common sense.
 
Hear Again said:
Laws are what keep this country safe. If we didn't have laws, we would be living in a world where everyone's safety is gravely put at risk. I'm surprised you don't understand this. It's common sense.
Click to expand...

is there an echo in here? you just said that in post #286.

a philosopher once said - "Good laws lead to the making of better ones; bad ones bring about worse." Makes you wonder why Third Reich, U.S.S.R., and many other oppressive regimes collapsed.

there are unnecessary laws and rightful laws. Your view of laws are more of oppressive side. No law enforcement officer will stand behind you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top