King James...

Status
Not open for further replies.
King James was womanized, but I did not see how he was homosexual.

Right, I not judge him. King James willing forgave what his mistake everything. No one perfect! I read his long story life. It WASN'T HOMOSEXUAL!!! Someone threaten him death!!!the poison. Catholic set it up and jealous over King James. They hated truth KJV Bible. King James was very good man and truth a person.

CyberRed, Right!
 
Right, I not judge him. King James willing forgave what his mistake everything. No one perfect! I read his long story life. It WASN'T HOMOSEXUAL!!! Someone threaten him death!!!the poison. Catholic set it up and jealous over King James. They hated truth KJV Bible. King James was very good man and truth a person.

Cite a source because you surely got the facts wrong.
 
EVERYTHING about him, has no facts. King James did lived sinful life, but very careful and revere God's Word. About hating KJV itself isn't true. But has arguments that those days catholic priest wasn't happy at all bec does not want people to know the whole Bible, that's how catholic and protestant hapened. Why? There's so much they didn't know. Bec only priest read the Bible. Catholic itself isn't wrong. Its individual tainted it. King James being a homosexual actual have no proof. Just like politics, lifelong arugments is similar is this. And it isn't important part, important part is the truth about who Jesus is and and what had happened and the histories.
 
christlove, you don't know what you're talking about.

King James was a homosexual; he married a woman but that doesn't make him a heterosexual. Many homosexuals married for tradition, not for love. His admission to his love for his companion was well established and it was an open secret.

The Chick Publication refuses to admit that part and resorted to a ridiculous conspiracy theory that has no evidence. It shows that Chick is a lying publication and only ignorant idiots fall for the Chick Publication.
 
The problem is how can you tell if he's gay or not. I've been searching thru the internet and find it that few says he is and other says he's not. I need to see the real evidence or a proof stated that he's gay or not.
 
christlove, you don't know what you're talking about.

King James was a homosexual; he married a woman but that doesn't make him a heterosexual. Many homosexuals married for tradition, not for love. His admission to his love for his companion was well established and it was an open secret.

The Chick Publication refuses to admit that part and resorted to a ridiculous conspiracy theory that has no evidence. It shows that Chick is a lying publication and only ignorant idiots fall for the Chick Publication.
I know what I'm talking about, Netrox. You believe anything and claimed the fact on the neg side from whatever. That doesn't prove urs is accurate and other isn't. You weren't living his time and there is no proof. I know there are some married person involved homosexual activities doesn't mean everyone is. You probably got equirer publication, LOL. And whatever it is, anything that is argumentive is unimportant. Just like gossippers and judgementals about another person's life. I don't think not one sinner have not living in sin any ways. Look at King David, for example. Why the difference btwn Saul and David? God looks the heart, not outward appearances.
 
You believe anything and claimed the fact on the neg side from whatever.

Did I say anything negative about King James? Just because I said he was a homosexual does not mean he was a bad person. I don't think homosexuality is wrong at all; the point I was making is that Christian freaks think King James is so holy and can't be a homosexual. They fear that once the facts surrounding King James are known, their Bible would fall apart.

And look at your postings and others, you're being defensive and trying to downplay his homosexuality yet rationalizing the authencity of the Bible which is hilarious because it wasn't my point. :)
 
Netrox, wasn't bisexual activity a norm in those days? I always thought so.
 
Did I say anything negative about King James? Just because I said he was a homosexual does not mean he was a bad person. I don't think homosexuality is wrong at all; the point I was making is that Christian freaks think King James is so holy and can't be a homosexual. They fear that once the facts surrounding King James are known, their Bible would fall apart.

And look at your postings and others, you're being defensive and trying to downplay his homosexuality yet rationalizing the authencity of the Bible which is hilarious because it wasn't my point. :)


I DO think homosexuality is wrong. It's not a choice - IMHO. Christian freaks NEVER think King James is sooo holy. I don't think of this way and I am a Christian myself. Maybe, it is just you who think this way, hmm ?

And, of course I don't agree with you about the " fear " that once the facts surroundin' King James are known, their Bible would fall apart. That's YOUR opinion, but not GOD'S.

There's NEVER fear that ONCE the facts surroundin' GOD are known. His Words shall NEVER pass away. :)
 
Homosexual is a choice. Anything that's not of God's is wrong. We are humans and the desires and our thoughts always prevent from living in godly fashion. If you notice King James was a homosexual ( by ur belief and agree what u read from internet), tho the Bible did mention if a man sleep with another man like sleep with a woman should be put to death, bec its nauseated God, its not just homosexuals, but anything else also. Lying and gossips is one of the deadly sins. When God became flesh, who is Jesus Himself experience temptations of all kinds, but have not sin, is the point of the cross. Correct, it is wroong to condemn homosexual when they take it out wrong POV how we minister gays. Look at a woman who commit adultery and should stone to death, but what did Jesus do. Al of us have different weaknesses and struggles. Some believes gays is exceptional, bec it worse sin than all. Now, that, I don't agree. There are some christians in Paul's time living in that and Paul did not act toward them as many christians are doing today. My way of seeing, there are christians are setting goal to live to honor God when they still struggling with homosexual feelings. The only thing Paul rebuke for those who are bigotry.. Like Sodom and Gomorah, Lord didn't blind them bec they live in homosexual, the Lord blind them bec homosexual force them to sleep with them. Its based on how people react or respond in those things. God destroyed bigoty, bec they are the one are hard to cooperate with. So King James was not holy at all, he has live in horrible sins, but he revere God's Word and wouldn't dare to taint it, bec that would be very serious consequences. Similar with bigotry or debauchery, will suffer severe consequences if not dealing with it. Remember, God is very forgiving and patience God, but there will be a time limit.
 
Homosexual is a choice.

Religion is a choice. It's YOUR choice to believe that homosexuality is wrong. Being gay is not a choice. Big difference.
 
I know what I'm talking about, Netrox. You believe anything and claimed the fact on the neg side from whatever. That doesn't prove urs is accurate and other isn't. You weren't living his time and there is no proof. I know there are some married person involved homosexual activities doesn't mean everyone is. You probably got equirer publication, LOL. And whatever it is, anything that is argumentive is unimportant. Just like gossippers and judgementals about another person's life. I don't think not one sinner have not living in sin any ways. Look at King David, for example. Why the difference btwn Saul and David? God looks the heart, not outward appearances.

AMEN!
 
Get the facts from wikipedia:
=

Most researchers would not consider Wikipedia a good source for facts. In this debate, Wikipedia is the equivalent of Chick Publications. Better find something better to support your argument.
 
Religion is a choice. It's YOUR choice to believe that homosexuality is wrong. Being gay is not a choice. Big difference.

Everyone have choices in every aspects in life. Both side scientist still have disagreements on the view of gays. Every person have tendencies of any kinds. Yes, my beliefs that practicing homosexual is a sin, sin as of other sins. But feeling desires and etc isn't a sin, but get into it, is sin. As religions goes, yes, its a choice, God gave us a choice, either accept or reject. We are human, inspite of degree of intelectual are still short coming.
 
In this debate, Wikipedia is the equivalent of Chick Publications. Better find something better to support your argument.

NPR : Assessing Wikipedia's Accuracy

"In the wake of questions of accuracy, a survey by the science journal Nature finds that science entries in the volunteer-driven, online encyclopedia Wikipedia are "not markedly less accurate" than those found in Encyclopaedia Britannica. Nature reporter Mark Peplow discusses the survey."

Translation: it's very accurate. Would they say the same for Chick Publication? No. It's full of hot air and full of opinions.
 
NPR : Assessing Wikipedia's Accuracy

"In the wake of questions of accuracy, a survey by the science journal Nature finds that science entries in the volunteer-driven, online encyclopedia Wikipedia are "not markedly less accurate" than those found in Encyclopaedia Britannica. Nature reporter Mark Peplow discusses the survey."

Translation: it's very accurate. Would they say the same for Chick Publication? No. It's full of hot air and full of opinions.
There are argumentive in every way. People have their preference to choose what they think. No matter what you read. If u read thinking their is no argumentive about american history, I don't agree. Bec there are some are editing the whole stroy. Some put all the good out and put the bad in, just like mews media. There are very broad views of opinions and argumentive.
 
Please don't make any judgment against King James, netrox, you said "
That disgusting Bible project was headed by a homosexual! Horrible!" You see an idea about Jesus what He was saying. When all of those people were chasing after the whore (woman). She was running toward Jesus Christ, she knelt down in front of Him. When those people who chasing the whore were planning to stoning to her death. Then Jesus Christ put on hold those people off, He sat down and thinking when using his finger in circle on the ground. He stood up and it is same for all of you people! What it means why those people judging against the whore (woman) means it is worse than others? Those people were shocked and they dropped the stones to the ground. After that, they immediately left! Jesus Christ told the whore (woman) to sin no more! She knelt down before Him and ask for forgiveness. That is what I wanted to share with you that you cannot measure with other people like that! Jesus Christ is the only way to come into your heart and you can accept His blood to come into your heart and cleanse away all of your sins.

If there were any computer back in 1600's and information were included about the King James' background then I would have believed it by now. That is why we have so much controversial issues because of getting all different facts about King James. We just never know if the information has been covered up!?!?
 
NPR : Assessing Wikipedia's Accuracy

"In the wake of questions of accuracy, a survey by the science journal Nature finds that science entries in the volunteer-driven, online encyclopedia Wikipedia are "not markedly less accurate" than those found in Encyclopaedia Britannica. Nature reporter Mark Peplow discusses the survey."

Translation: it's very accurate. Would they say the same for Chick Publication? No. It's full of hot air and full of opinions.

Believe what you want about Wikipedia, but if it is your only source then you haven't really researched anything yet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top