- Joined
- Sep 14, 2006
- Messages
- 14,491
- Reaction score
- 11
Later AandEmomma.
I don't know of any school that uses SEE as it main communication mode.
I read PFH's link on SEE and it seemed more confusing that anything. It stated that they use the same sign for 'blue' and 'blew' which are two totally different concepts, yet they use the same sign.
Looks to me like they are signing for the phonetic equivalent of English, not an actual language equivalent. Far as I can SEE, SEE is just a bunch of useless gibberish.
Exactly!
And phonics has never been my forte and I'm sure I'm not the only one. :P
Heck, phonics is not even the forte of many hearing people. English is too inconsistent phonetically.
Intervertions? No, dear, you are not qualified to work as a clinical psycholgist in any state in the U.S. You cannot practice clinical psychology without either a Ph.D. or a Psy.D. in clinical psychology. In fact, I am certain that the APA would be very interested in the fact that you are misrepresenting yourself and your qualifications by stating that you can practice clinical psychology. You can't even identify yourself as a psychologist without a PhD, or a PsyD. In fact, I am ethically obligated to report anyone who is claiming to practice without a degree and the proper credentials.
Your ad hominems are hysterical.
Thanks, however, for showing all that your "peace" and "smile" and rainbows and unicorns was not reality when it comes to your true personality.
I have no interest in reading your dissertation, as the above post indicates that you have difficulty in discerning the difference between reality and pretense, as you are pretending to be a psychologist and are pretending to practice clinical psychology.
I remember when loml spelled naught as nawt.
Good to see you are aware of this......just sayin
Yep, I read it. And you are wrong again. It says it right there in the paragraph where it discusses the difference between SEE I and SEE II.
I am still looking for the answer to my question regarding the name of one school that uses SEE I or SEE II as the language of instruction. You claim there are many. Surely out of that "many" you can name just one.
Since you can't seem to find it, here you go:
In SEE1, all compound words are formed as separate signs - instead of using the ASL sign for butterfly, SEE1 places the signs for but, er, and fly in sequential order. SEE1 also uses the same sign for all homonyms - the same sign is used to sign blue and blew.
SEE2 was developed by Gerilee Gustason, Esther Zawolkow, and Donna
Pfetzing in the early 1970s. As an offshoot of SEE1, many features of SEE2 are
identical to that code system. Initializations and grammatical markers are also
used in SEE2, but compound words with an equivalent ASL sign are used as
the ASL sign, as with butterfly. SEE2 is also used in Singapore. About 75% to 80% of SEE2 signs are either borrowed from ASL or are modified ASL signs.
Signing Exact English uses more markers as opposed to Signed English, which
uses 14 markers.
As there is no more formal use of SEE1, Signing Exact English is no longer
referred to as SEE2, but rather SEE.
So, how about those schools using SEE as their language of instruction, since
it is not used formally any longer?
Right. There's that Cued Speech for you!
I don't either. I even did a Google search for one, and can't find anything. But SEESign said there were "many" schools that use SEE, so I'm waiting for her to name one. Just one, that's all I ask for.
This kind of stuff is exactly what I am talking about when I say she is making innaccurate and false statements.
Just sayin what?
where ya been?