It must get tiring!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Later AandEmomma.
 
I don't know of any school that uses SEE as it main communication mode.

I don't either. I even did a Google search for one, and can't find anything. But SEESign said there were "many" schools that use SEE, so I'm waiting for her to name one. Just one, that's all I ask for.

This kind of stuff is exactly what I am talking about when I say she is making innaccurate and false statements.
 
bye everyone and your probally going to see me tomorrow I gotta work and do college work but i can squeeze yall in lol
 
And it is clear that SEESign claims to be signing SEE, but she does not really know if she is signing SEE or Signed English according to her posts.
 
I read PFH's link on SEE and it seemed more confusing that anything. It stated that they use the same sign for 'blue' and 'blew' which are two totally different concepts, yet they use the same sign.

Looks to me like they are signing for the phonetic equivalent of English, not an actual language equivalent. Far as I can SEE, SEE is just a bunch of useless gibberish. :lol:
 
I read PFH's link on SEE and it seemed more confusing that anything. It stated that they use the same sign for 'blue' and 'blew' which are two totally different concepts, yet they use the same sign.

Looks to me like they are signing for the phonetic equivalent of English, not an actual language equivalent. Far as I can SEE, SEE is just a bunch of useless gibberish. :lol:

Exactly!
 
Heck, phonics is not even the forte of many hearing people. English is too inconsistent phonetically.

I remember when loml spelled naught as nawt.
 
Last edited:
Intervertions? No, dear, you are not qualified to work as a clinical psycholgist in any state in the U.S. You cannot practice clinical psychology without either a Ph.D. or a Psy.D. in clinical psychology. In fact, I am certain that the APA would be very interested in the fact that you are misrepresenting yourself and your qualifications by stating that you can practice clinical psychology. You can't even identify yourself as a psychologist without a PhD, or a PsyD. In fact, I am ethically obligated to report anyone who is claiming to practice without a degree and the proper credentials.

Your ad hominems are hysterical. :laugh2:
Thanks, however, for showing all that your "peace" and "smile" and rainbows and unicorns was not reality when it comes to your true personality.

I have no interest in reading your dissertation, as the above post indicates that you have difficulty in discerning the difference between reality and pretense, as you are pretending to be a psychologist and are pretending to practice clinical psychology.

Good to see you are aware of this......just sayin
 
Yep, I read it. And you are wrong again. It says it right there in the paragraph where it discusses the difference between SEE I and SEE II.

I am still looking for the answer to my question regarding the name of one school that uses SEE I or SEE II as the language of instruction. You claim there are many. Surely out of that "many" you can name just one.:cool2:

Since you can't seem to find it, here you go:

In SEE1, all compound words are formed as separate signs - instead of using the ASL sign for butterfly, SEE1 places the signs for but, er, and fly in sequential order. SEE1 also uses the same sign for all homonyms - the same sign is used to sign blue and blew.
SEE2 was developed by Gerilee Gustason, Esther Zawolkow, and Donna
Pfetzing in the early 1970s. As an offshoot of SEE1, many features of SEE2 are
identical to that code system. Initializations and grammatical markers are also
used in SEE2, but compound words with an equivalent ASL sign are used as
the ASL sign, as with butterfly. SEE2 is also used in Singapore. About 75% to 80% of SEE2 signs are either borrowed from ASL or are modified ASL signs.
Signing Exact English uses more markers as opposed to Signed English, which
uses 14 markers.
As there is no more formal use of SEE1, Signing Exact English is no longer
referred to as SEE2, but rather SEE.

So, how about those schools using SEE as their language of instruction, since
it is not used formally any longer?

Oh my goodness. Too funny. Read again Jillio when your head has had a chance to decompress.

SEE I (Seeing Essential English) is no longer used which is why SEE II (Signing Exact English) is now referred to only as SEE. Hence the reason why I said Seeing Essential English was a moot point.

Also, you are just confusing people further with your misperceptions. It clearly states that the sign for Butterfly is the same in ASL as in SEE.

You would like a link to one school that uses SEE?

Ok. Here are two. Enjoy ;-)

Crown Valley Elementary School: Deaf & Hard of Hearing (DHH Program)

Programs
 
I don't either. I even did a Google search for one, and can't find anything. But SEESign said there were "many" schools that use SEE, so I'm waiting for her to name one. Just one, that's all I ask for.

This kind of stuff is exactly what I am talking about when I say she is making innaccurate and false statements.

So, did you want to eat your words now or later?

I didn't provide just one, but two links just to sweeten the deal.

I make no inaccurate or false statements, unlike some people I see around here.
 
Funny thing is, I am D/HH and yet I received my school's top English writing award during my senior year. People have said I have an ability to play with words. I admit, this hasn't come without it's struggles. I think it is mostly due to the fact that I was and still am a total book junkie. I can write well, but my speech, apparently is lacking some. The last time my dad criticized me for this, I told him I was 27 years old, I think my speech is as good as it will ever be at this point in my life.

Maybe as a kid being raised orally, I just compensated for things subconsciously?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top