- Joined
- Jan 2, 2008
- Messages
- 3,418
- Reaction score
- 8
http://www.alldeaf.com/hearing-aids...forcing-deaf-child-wear-ci-6.html#post1756464
Here is one of many. Just read his posting history and it comes out all over the place.
What a thread! A whole lot of people pointing fingers and tossing the "audist" label all over the place, and a longstanding brawl between 2 hearing parents of adult deaf children making things messy. Oh, that's right, there was PFH demanding that people label each other and choose "sides" accordingly. I wouldn't label the posters involved in that discussion based on what someone else says and I won't do it now. I didn't and don't see an example of Rick48 discriminating against the deaf in that thread.
I don't even think Rick48 was involved in that conversation until -- and it was as bizarre then as it is right now -- out of the blue someone demanded to know who thinks Rick48 is an audist -- as if he's some sort of litmus test. No examples of his heinous deeds, but a whole lot of pitchforks and the townspeople shouting "audist!" and "If he floats, he's a witch!" Here's the takeaway: either call Rick48 an audist on blind faith or you will be called an audist for not doing so.
Makes no sense, just deflects from the topic at hand: small-town sheriff PFH harassing a deaf kid who doesn't value hearing in the same way he does, who doesn't exhibit what PFH thinks is the "right" behavior, or use the "right" language or label himself in the way PFH thinks is most proper. If I were the labeling type ... I don't think it would be Rick48 I'd point to as an audist.