Cloggy
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2005
- Messages
- 4,703
- Reaction score
- 0
Knew would be saying that..Sigh...back to square one again.
Knew would be saying that..Sigh...back to square one again.
Knew would be saying that..
Absolutely nothing..!!! That's great thinking..!!Have you ever heard of doing both? Whats wrong with that?
Hardly... You think too highly of me... but sometimes it's obvious...Of course, you know everything.
I have. I've seen Cloggy take and synthesize input from the Deaf community, with gratitude, looking back through his many years here starting well before I began reading regularly almost 5 years ago.
And I've also seen him (and others) as a great source of information and inspiration, and I'm surprised that you don't find that to be the case as well, especially when it comes to topics that he has experience with -- raising a deaf child, making a decision about CIs, etc. -- that most here don't have. Fewer and fewer stick around given the reception, but still, there's a regular stream of new parents of deaf children who stop by looking for information about what it means to be deaf (which those who are themselves deaf can provide) and what's involved in raising deaf kids and making decisions about technology and language and the current state of academic placement (which those who are both deaf and hearing and have raised or are now raising deaf children can provide).
That handful of us who are hearing and deaf parents of deaf kids can and do learn a lot from this community, and can also provide a great deal of info. about what our children are experiencing both to this community and to the next generation of new parents who come here. But the deaf community here and beyond is not homogeneous, so some of us may be listening to those who are deaf/hoh, as you suggest: listening to the majority of those who say go mainstream (whether with ASL or oral support) or deaf school (oral) vs. a minority who advise that deaf kids need to learn in an ASL environment.
You are very right.It keeps occurring to me that a good bit of the differences between Cloggy and a number of other posters could well come from location! Norway and the US are bound of have cultural differences as well as language with Cloggy using what is bound to be at least a second language when posting here.
didn't mix and match at all and my dots were to show that a part was left out.
You wrote: "That handful of us who are hearing and deaf parents of deaf kids can and do learn a lot from this community, and can also provide a great deal of info. about what our children are experiencing both to this community and to the next generation of new parents who come here. But the deaf community here and beyond is not homogeneous, so some of us may be listening to those who are deaf/hoh, as you suggest: listening to the majority of those who say go mainstream (whether with ASL or oral support) or deaf school (oral) vs. a minority who advise that deaf kids need to learn in an ASL environment."
I quoted: ""That handful of us who are hearing and deaf parents of deaf kids can and do learn a lot from this community, ....so some of us may be listening to those who are deaf/hoh, as you suggest: listening to the majority of those who say go mainstream (whether with ASL or oral support) or deaf school (oral) vs. a minority who advise that deaf kids need to learn in an ASL environment."
SAME PARAGRAPH
Where's the mixing and matching? I left out the part in the middle of the same paragraph because I am asking you if you're saying that "from this community...majority of dhh/deaf recommend mainstreaming" and I even threw in "I'm assuming by "this community" you mean AD". If I'm wrong, just say so.
There was no mixing/matching. That made me laugh though, thanks.
You still haven't answered the question BTW.
You've combined the beginning of one sentence about one thing with the end of another about something different. I could do that with your paragraph below and quote you as saying : "I could learn a lot from ...you." if that's what you mean, you're welcome . But if you have a question about the scope of my statement or who I'm referring to, my previous message includes a direct quote that's bolded to show where you can find the answer.
You've combined the beginning of one sentence about one thing with the end of another about something different. I could do that with your paragraph below and quote you as saying : "I could learn a lot from ...you." if that's what you mean, you're welcome . But if you have a question about the scope of my statement or who I'm referring to, my previous message includes a direct quote that's bolded to show where you can find the answer.
So, in a very roundabout way then, you're saying the majority of the Deaf community, here and beyond, support mainstreaming?
Knowing her, it's not what she meant. Having learned about people here, I know it's not the case. And I think you also know that.. on both accountsSo, in a very roundabout way then, you're saying the majority of the Deaf community, here and beyond, support mainstreaming?
Knowing her, it's not what she meant. Having learned about people here, I know it's not the case. And I think you also know that.. on both accounts
You have seen here on AD for a while as well...
But.. I'll let her explain...
Yes Ma'm. Sorry Ma'm. I apologize for involving myself... :Oops:Please do let her answer the question I directed to her.
ok, let me do you and GrendelQ the courtesy of including the ENTIRE paragraph:
......
I don't support it and I was mainstreamed.
Who said that?
That's not my experience...
It's interesting you say "..your child is still deaf."
I suddenly realise.. "deaf" is a label here... It's an identification for the group..
The child cannot hear without CI, so it is "deaf". It belongs in the deaf people world..
I see "deaf" as a physical thing... as "not able to hear".. Not a label, but a way to describe a function.
As a parent looking at his daughter listening & chatting away to her family, friends, on the telephone.. my daughter is not deaf. Her whole waking time is spent listening to sounds. And when she goes to sleep, she takes off the CI to be charged, and goes to sleep... after some more chatting...
If "deaf" means "cannot hear anything" or "cannot recognise speech".. then this child is not deaf.
So... she's "deaf" so that she can "belong" in the group with all other people that have been born deaf or became deaf. But otherwise .. she's not deaf.
She's been born deaf... now she can hear.
Absolutely nothing..!!! That's great thinking..!!
We should have done that.. Wait.. We did....
you got you memory misplaced or more accurately, you pretended you did.