Hate new cars

Yup, it is one of top choice of criminals. Al Capone personally wrote letter to Henry Ford for building the best car that helped him commit crimes.

Dang! I do love my Excursion but I miss SuperDuty trucks. I might go for 1999-2001 Ford truck that got

Three pedals
Two sticks
No spark plugs

Btw Ford trucks are top 3 for stole too.
 
I never own american cars before. Just Japanese and Europe vehicles. Too many of my friends got problem with their american cars and rare happen to my old Subaru for 7 years. Just replaced the oxygen sensor and that's it. I drove american many times and they feels like cheap and ugly design.

z28-0.jpg


Outside looks nice

But inside looks ****ing ugly!

2013-chevrolet-camaro-2-door-coupe-ls-w-1ls-steering-wheel_100406171_l.jpg


Why GM use Malibu or Impala's steering wheel for $75,000 2014 CAMARO Z/28!?!?


So I like Subaru's design better.

modp_1004_16_o+2011_subaru_wrx_sti+steering_wheel.jpg

i agree, its stupid and lazy of Chev to do an ugly dashboard design...just LAZY and unimaginative....
 
Because you jumped too quick? :Dunno:

Contact Us : O2simulator Authority

There is support email and not all business from online use phone, there is choose as forum, email, IM, etc.

Again, Explain me why my old coworker's car was 2001 and no problem with O2 simulator.

I jump too quick? NO, You see the address is PO BOX and no telephone. Just email. If you are not understand the electrical diagram or instruction sheet then contact the seller, they may not return back to your email... Reason? They will not take responsibility for complications.
Your friend's Subaru have no problem with an O2 sensor simulator? I would say the software in Subaru PCM is too slow to reading the outputs from sensors.... Just says
 
Damn gone for 2 days roughly, who dropped the bomb?

I just want to know why all these brand new cars are being modified with turbos, NOS and O2 bypass sensoes and cat deletes if the government is sooooooo strict with anti polution control??? LOL and yes, Im refering to those awesome Jap cars you all are raving about.
 
Call that capitalism, don't forget. You think bribes don't exists? Do you have any idea who these judges have relationships with?

If all judges is sitting on Honda stocks, they would most likely going to choose Honda over others so that they don't lose money on these stocks. That is one example of hidden bias going on. Or even if judge son in law works for Honda, he probably put Honda in favor... Money itself has the power to create biased climate.

There are so much hidden BS out there that you don't even realize exists. I have seen enough.

And guess what? I am too a DRIVER!

um.... Car and Driver magazine reviews hundreds of different cars from different companies.... and you're saying they're biased to a certain brand?

think Jim Cramer. and Dr. Drew.
 
It doesn't matter where the cars are made. It matters what manufacturers design. For example, Honda has high quality parts while some others (especially American cars) don't. THUS, Honda and other Japanese cars are more expensive than American cars.
eh? price of Japanese cars are relatively same as American cars. or cheaper. the profit margin for Honda is extremely small. it was surprising that its business strategy actually worked. Toyota was able to keep its cost down because of its extremely efficient inventory practice and efficient manufacturing process. Both Honda and Toyota are very famous for its business strategies. They're the most important textbooks for any business student.

Didn't you notice that auto insurances on Japanese cars cost higher? Insurance for my car, Scion tC costs me $800/yr while ins for my wife's van, Chrysler Town and Country costs her $650/yr. They are both 7 years old.

the insurance rate is dependent on where you live, theft rate on specific brand, your driving record, driving habit, and the probability/likelihood of accident.

for ie - an insurance rate for motorcycle in NYC costs 2-3x more than for motorcycle in NJ. my insurance rate is lower than my parents because I don't commute during rush hour.
 
I just checked MPG for Ford F-250 with diesel and it is 14-16 mpg...

Whoa... what's terrible MPG... :ugh:

Also, Ford didn't reveal MPG on their website.
 
I just checked MPG for Ford F-250 with diesel and it is 14-16 mpg...

Whoa... what's terrible MPG... :ugh:

Also, Ford didn't reveal MPG on their website.

they're not required by law to show MPG for certain class like heavy duty. it's pointless to show MPG especially for heavy duty, commercial vehicle, etc. they're not gas-efficient vehicles. what's the point?
 
they're not required by law to show MPG for certain class like heavy duty. it's pointless to show MPG especially for heavy duty, commercial vehicle, etc. they're not gas-efficient vehicles. what's the point?

I thought that Ford did revealed when I was teen, but anything seems change it.

I think that big truck with diesel gets around 24 MPG, but after research with other websites - diesel and gas are hardly difference for F-250 Super Duty.
 
I thought that Ford did revealed when I was teen, but anything seems change it.

I think that big truck with diesel gets around 24 MPG, but after research with other websites - diesel and gas are hardly difference for F-250 Super Duty.

24 mpg? big truck? LOL!!!!!
 
24 mpg? big truck? LOL!!!!!

It don't make sense because I think diesel supposed to have higher MPG than gas.

In 10 years ago, my father's truck - F-150 and got around 13-14 mpg, but much less when towing.
 
No, PU truck is fuel efficient in many ways. The reason why EPA don't require maker show MPG on commercial and light truck is because there are too many variables and depends on what condition that would result in X MPG.

For example, I drive my Diesel truck on highway at long period of time with load kn back, no pulling anything I get about 22 MPG. I am not kidding. BUT, if driving in city all the time with empty load, will certain drop MPG to 15 in summer, 13 in winter. However, if I pull something like a RV, I might lose few MPG, but overall the MPG is decent for the amount of energy to move the mass.

they're not required by law to show MPG for certain class like heavy duty. it's pointless to show MPG especially for heavy duty, commercial vehicle, etc. they're not gas-efficient vehicles. what's the point?
 
Back
Top