You can't read and write in ASL, sorry. If a Deaf child is going to be literate in the US, they need to learn English.
You just don't seem to understand that they use ASL to learn English.
You can't read and write in ASL, sorry. If a Deaf child is going to be literate in the US, they need to learn English.
You just don't seem to understand that they use ASL to learn English.
Most children dont end up NOT fully able to write anyway.
You just don't seem to understand that they use ASL to learn English.
Oh yes...witnessed that throughout my years of teaching.
Remember that is from a hearing's perspective.
The key word here is "not JUST" only being able to read and write.
Don't don't care if they learn English by an alien beaming the knowledge directly into their brains, as long as they get it! You don't seem to see that there are people in this thread who are saying that reading and writing don't matter if they have ASL. I disagree.
And most aren't geniuses in science either.
Unfortunately, most deaf kids do leave high school close to functionally illiterate (functionally illiterate - definition of functionally illiterate by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.), so minimum standards for deaf kids leaving school are desperately needed.
Yeah, truth is a bitch, eh?
Comes from not having full access to language during their formative years causing them to end up with language delays or even worse, language deficits which affects their ability to achieve critical thinking skills.
That's why the oral-only philosophy and MCEs should be banned.
Give them both languages...ASL and English to all.
You are really gonna pull out the "hearing perspective" flag on the definition of literate? :roll: We are all using English here, I think it is fine to depend on the actually definition of the words we are using.
You seem to have me confused with someone who doesn't support ASL.
So you don't support PFH and the others who have expressed that English doesn't matter?
You just don't seem to understand that they use ASL to learn English.
I think your number is off a decimal point or two but the percentage of people worldwide who use English is actually larger than that of those who use ASL in the good old USA. Based on your logic then its you who needs "to stop being all gung-ho on" ASL.
BTW are you raising your daughter so that she is not learning how to read and/or write English?
Deaf children can be, and some are, LITERATE, in ASL. Unfortunately, in our present society in the U.S., English is deemed as "The language" to learn.
One can fully function in the United States without English. It's a foreign concept for many people. If a child learns Spanish as a second language and can use it with minimal conversation skills, we often jump for joy at his accomplishment. Yet a deaf child who is fluent in ASL and can use basic English, as his SECOND language, is told to do better. That's hypocritical...and unfair. Especially since often there isn't a formal assessment for ASL in place to show his true literacy skills with his FIRST language.
That was exactly what I was getting at. See how the hearing people couldn't get it. Was I clear enough in my use of English? not sure.... Or are they illiterate?