Z
Z_C
Guest
Wow, interesting reading.
I have a question, what is "audist"? I am clueless on what this means?
I have a question, what is "audist"? I am clueless on what this means?
do a search in alldeaf on this word "audist" but please don't start discussing this in this thread! there are few threads dedicated to this word. thanks!Z_C said:Wow, interesting reading.
I have a question, what is "audist"? I am clueless on what this means?
Boult said:do a search in alldeaf on this word "audist" but please don't start discussing this in this thread! there are few threads dedicated to this word. thanks!
..Rediculous - why? You chose for your children as well. That's the task of the parent. That's what parents are for. Who else should make decisions regarding children? Or are you suggesting that hearing parents should not be allowed to make choices for their deaf children? That would be something!Sweetmind said:It is one thing to allow a person to choose to use an auditory device, but i see that it is unfair to decide for any individual to have a surgery that changes their physical properties. Once a person is mature enough to decide to have a CI surgically implanted, the decision should be made. To have a parent/guardian etc.choose this for a child is ridiculous.
..The child will become.... deaf. Like other children become deaf and then adjust to deafness. There's plenty of examples in this messageboard.Sweetmind said:Why should it be ok to force a person into a surgery that they may rely on for their entire life. Once a child has become accustomed to these devices it is something that they expect to have for the rest of their life. If the device fails or does not continue to work in the same way for their entire life, then they no longer can use what they have been expected to rely on. This is totally unfair to any child or adult.
..Exactly, children cannot make that decision. So parents take that decision whether to do it or not. ..Sweetmind said:If they have the choice to decide whether to use an auditory device or not then they can make that decision for themselves. It is wrong to force anyone to depend on something when naturally they are not going to have that. Children cannot make that decision. They should have the choice to decide on adapting their physical properties on their own. This should not take place unless they have been fully educated on ALL of the possibilities...positive and negative.
..They grow of deaf or Deaf. At least they had a choice...Sweetmind said:If a child relies on the auditory device and then it suddenly isn’t working anymore, then it is something that they have no choice but to have taken from them. These surgeries are not inexpensive. It takes money to maintain these devices and not all people are able to keep up with this. What happens when a child decides that they do not want to utilize this technology?
..There are quite a few people here that actually have it (unlike you) and therefore are theexperts... and they disagree. And some who agree...Sweetmind said:It is wrong to force a person to rely on something each day, when naturally they may be better off without a device being implanted into their bodies.
..You remember about the implanting at as young age as possible for the best results? No - guess not. ..Sweetmind said:Insurance does not cover a CI removal. If a person chooses that route then more power to them,but it is not an issue that should be decided by a person that will not have to live with it. The person that is getting a surgery of this type or any other surgery should be allowed to choose for themselves. It is something that will have impact, whether positive or negative, a person for the rest of their life.
..What I have seen here, it's the Deaf world that automatically stop accepting someone that has a CI.Sweetmind said:By forcing an individual into a life altering procedure it is the same as saying you are not “good” enough the way that you were born. You must change physically for you to be accepted by the real world. Is this really the impression we want to make on deaf children.
..And they have a choice. You just don't want them to have it. You deny children - or parents of children - the choice...Sweetmind said:It is a huge put down to deaf childrens true identity. People must have a choice, it is only fair! We should
appreciate the differences in all people. If we were all the same, then the world would be a very boring place.
..Please don't..Sweetmind said:Therefore we have the right to maintain the status we were born with...people need to learn to accept that. Any adaptation that needs to be made should be made within the faultfinders, not the children. Acceptance is KEY! Need I say more?
Sweetmind said:"Tell the mothers I said, "Don't try to change your child; you are the adult, you bear the burden of change" - Harlan Lane. Thats what it needs to get through your head. Seeing as how there are more cons than pros to getting a CI, ( as such stated in other topics),..
You should not just read the posts you like, also some of members that actually have CI. And then, reread everything with the intention to understand it...Not Harlan Lane said:"Tell the mothers I said, "Help your child; you are the adult, you bear the burden of resposibility to give the child all the possibilities life can give"
..You don't need to hear to be alive - I agree.There's no need to deny hearing either...Sweetmind said:It is more responsible to NOT implant a child. You dont need to hear to be alive. And if a d/Deaf child is not good enough for you then you need to reconsider your morals and prejudices.
Like it, love it, or leave it alone.
A pleasure as allways GNU - sorry - SweetmindSweetmind said:Thank you!
Sweetmind
Welcome Zack,Z_C said:Wow, interesting reading.
I have a question, what is "audist"? I am clueless on what this means?
Wow, interesting reading.
I have a question, what is "audist"? I am clueless on what this means?
Well, you posted this in another topic where it was not supposed to be either, so I replied here - this (not yours) - this topic.Sweetmind said:PSSTT:: (Hearing) Cloggy and (Deaf Oralism) Boult as Ci Radicals, stay out of it since this topic is not belong to you. Thanks!
gnulinuxman said:Cloggy, no matter what you say, telling someone that not implanting deaf children is "child-abuse" is extremely rude. Since when is it child abuse to let a kid be who and what they are when it's not THAT important? Seriously, I can understand glasses, wheelchairs, fake legs, etc. because those I would view as more high-priority. But you don't need to be hearing to be a success in the world.
If a deaf child has never heared, Sweetmind say's it is not allowed to have CI!Sweetmind: "CI is for latened deaf people."
Cloggy: And THAT is child-abuse... withholding the possibility of hearing from a deaf child just because it has never heared. That's huge discrimination!!
Now if I compare this post with the previous post..... ... I can with all conviction say.... Hi Sweetmind - You're back!! Welcome...Sweetmind said:All I am seeing the whole thing in my topic that Audist, CI radicals, ASL/Oralism extremists people that were trying to hide a very good thing about Deaf people 's abilities that we already handed out the truth and facts on the table.
Why bother to destroy me between ASL/Oralism extremists that I m in the middle of both sides in my writings. So what the heck! You tried to destroy my reputation of being deaf that I am Deaf and Single Mom and Grandmother with my care and love for any kind of Deaf children 's true identity, Deaf children's Deaf Heritage, Deaf poems, Deaf Arts, Acceptance, Adapation and many more.
You have been writing on my Nickname in everywhere that I did not writing on anything in any topic. So what is your intention to fight with me and put me down so hard? Is it because I strongly believe in Deaf children s abilities and Deaf children 's Rights.
AND you , gnos. err Cloggy, I strongly believe you are the representative of Cochlear Implant Corporation that Boult might be the one too as well as I know of Netrox is the one too already from the past. He is very disrespectful toward Deaf children s alternative in many ways that we already disagreed many things that you look down on us Deaf people and our abilities that can be possible. It s very huge prejudced that I m receiving a lot from Cloggy that I dont have any good feelings for him at all.
Now Boult says he works for the insurance so he find people to buy it and will cover everything for their CI device in Medical expenses that is not necessary. What a joke ....If Boult works for insurance companies to try to get CI covered that means he is obviously prejudiced. I do not have any good feelings for him at all, too.
And make money from them to push tooo damn far so thats the reason they are doing it in my topic that the topic isnt saying anything about device itself only.. It s about Deaf people cannot hear everything with devices. PERIOD!
Now it s showing the true color of these audism people tried to do this to me and others that is who agrees with me. Why attack those people who stand up for what they strongly believe into a very positive reinforcement about our Deaf people s abilities and BI BI lanuages in Deaf community into the diverse world.
All I am seeing it s so extremely prejudiced by those same people that have no respect for me or Deaf children s rights / abilities. Also I want to say thank you some of you for your strength to stand up for what you strongly believe in between Deaf and Latened Deaf who were struggled because of their attitudes that has not ended yet.
Leave Deaf people 's full of acceptances of being deaf alone and let us feel great about ourselves that we have so much Deaf spirit that we can do anything except hear. The adapation of our Deaf 's abilities that we Deaf people we do not feel a failure that you created us more failures that I dont appreciate it at all.
Thank you! Sweetmind
AND you , gnos. err Cloggy, I strongly believe you are the representative of Cochlear Implant Corporation that Boult might be the one too as well as I know of Netrox is the one too already from the past. He is very disrespectful toward Deaf children s alternative in many ways that we already disagreed many things that you look down on us Deaf people and our abilities that can be possible. It s very huge prejudced that I m receiving a lot from Cloggy that I dont have any good feelings for him at all.
re·al·i·ty (r-l-t)
n.
The quality or state of being actual or true.
The totality of all things possessing actuality, existence, or essence.
That which exists objectively and in fact.
Main Entry: para·noia
Pronunciation: "par-&-'noi-&
Function: noun
1 : a psychosis characterized by systematized delusions of persecution or grandeur usually without hallucinations
2 : a tendency on the part of an individual or group toward excessive or irrational suspiciousness and distrustfulness of others
YOU, perhaps... but I know several Deaf people who don't feel like they are and don't seem that way, and one of them doesn't use his voice.Fragmenter said:He wasn't being rude, he made a good point. Disjoining your deaf child from the world may be viewed as child abuse. And don't tell me we aren't disjoined from the world because we are!
I read her autobiography. Nobody is perfect. She isn't perfect. She grew up without either sense and learned to speak with her mouth. What sense do you think she's going to want?Fragmenter said:If you ask Helen Keller which sense she would want back, she will choose to get her hearing back in a heartbeat. She knows more than you and I ever will. I dare you to try and say anything to reject her knowledge.
Everybody feels pity for blind people. Everybody feels sorry for them. They always get what they need. How many parents force blind children to be sighted? How often do you see that? Yet you're suggesting to continue the awful practice of expecting deaf people to be normal. Blind people aren't expected to be normal, so why are deaf people expected to be normal?Fragmenter said:"If I, deaf, blind, find life rich and interesting, how much more can you gain by the use of your five senses!"
- Helen Keller, 1928
Hearing doesn't only help your chances of being successful in the world, it allows you to interact with the world. Helen Keller said she'd choose to get her hearing back over her sight because she'd rather to join the world instead of seeing the world.
gnulinuxman said:............ How many parents force blind children to be sighted? How often do you see that?.......
Sweetmind said:AND you , gnos. err Cloggy, I strongly believe you are the representative of Cochlear Implant Corporation that Boult might be the one too as well as I know of Netrox is the one too already from the past. He is very disrespectful toward Deaf children s alternative in many ways that we already disagreed many things that you look down on us Deaf people and our abilities that can be possible. It s very huge prejudced that I m receiving a lot from Cloggy that I dont have any good feelings for him at all.
Now Boult says he works for the insurance so he find people to buy it and will cover everything for their CI device in Medical expenses that is not necessary. What a joke ....If Boult works for insurance companies to try to get CI covered that means he is obviously prejudiced. I do not have any good feelings for him at all, too.
gnulinuxman said:How many parents force blind children to be sighted? How often do you see that?
.Yet you're suggesting to continue the awful practice of expecting deaf people to be normal
Blind people aren't expected to be normal, so why are deaf people expected to be normal?
Fragmenter said:Dear Cowardly Individual, register here and post it up yourself and we'll talk.
This how I picture some members on AD:
Fragmenter said:Hearing doesn't only help your chances of being successful in the world, it allows you to interact with the world.
gnulinuxman said:What sense do you think she's going to want?
Everybody feels pity for blind people. Everybody feels sorry for them. They always get what they need. How many parents force blind children to be sighted?