jillio
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2006
- Messages
- 60,232
- Reaction score
- 19
Exactly and the pro-lifers can't even argue on that one.
Keep abortion--safe and legal!
They'll try.
Exactly and the pro-lifers can't even argue on that one.
Keep abortion--safe and legal!
You have to wait for me to answer before you can reply, "I didn't think so.":roll: The answer is "Yes, I have read Parent's Magazine, and several other parenting magazines. I have also read numerous textbooks that would apply..
If you have, then you would have known already.
You have to wait for me to answer before you can reply, "I didn't think so.":roll: The answer is "Yes, I have read Parent's Magazine, and several other parenting magazines. I have also read numerous textbooks that would apply.
Please provide a link or a citation for a single article that supports your claim. And we're not talking still births here. We are talking first trimester spontaeous abortions. And before you get all defensive here, "spontaneous abortion" is the proper term for miscarraige.
Never heard of people burying miscarried fetuses. I seriously doubt they were proper or formal burials if people do bury their miscarried fetuses.
Never heard of people burying miscarried fetuses. I seriously doubt they were proper or formal burials if people do bury their miscarried fetuses.
I have not heard of that, either.
That's what I'm sayin". However, another poster disagrees. That is why I have asked for support for her claim that these situations have appeared in parenting magazines.
I have seen nothing of the kind in all my years of reading. So, please, supply us all with a single article that supports your claim. We are all anxiously awaiting the opportunity to read this article.
I was eleven weeks pregnant when I miscarried, Two days later, when I'd regained some strength, Rick and I buried the baby.
"We all" You're again speaking for everyone, while you are the only one asking for a source. And I found it, while you were too lazy to search for it.
Mothering Magazine Miscarriage Article: Carrying On
It was in Mothering magazine just like I said.
This is not a legal burial. Nor was it a funeral. It was a woman and her husband putting tissue unto a hole in the earth. It is not common,nor is it recognized as such. One woman who chose to miscarry at home and save the tissue her body rejected, and then burying it beside the river is hardly evidence that anyone in this country performs a legal burial for the product of a miscarraige.
And I'm not speaking for anyone other than myself. I was reaffirming the statements of the other posters who also had expressed an interest in the article of a legal burial of the product of a miscarraige. They had already spoken for themselves.
This is not a legal burial. Nor was it a funeral. It was a woman and her husband putting tissue unto a hole in the earth. It is not common,nor is it recognized as such. One woman who chose to miscarry at home and save the tissue her body rejected, and then burying it beside the river is hardly evidence that anyone in this country performs a legal burial for the product of a miscarraige.
And I'm not speaking for anyone other than myself. I was reaffirming the statements of the other posters who also had expressed an interest in the article of a legal burial of the product of a miscarraige. They had already spoken for themselves.
I never had said it was a legal burial, I only had said that people do buried their dead babies, it was an option and it had been done.
Oh yea! I have read about informal burials like the one u described. For a moment there, I thought u mean formal burials conducted by a funeral parlor, death certificate and so forth. that would have been new to me but informal burials r common in many other cultures or during different times. Sorry for going off topic ..
No, you said people bury the product of a miscarraige. Of course, people bury dead babies all the time. But they also have a birth certificate, a death certificate, a legal name on both, and a legal burial.
BTW...it is illegal to dispose of any human tissue in the way this woman claims to have done.
Can you clarify on this?
According to the article, the woman had a miscarriage at 11 weeks and it is still considered as a fetus. How would that be considered as a human tissue when it is still a fetus?
She was 11 weeks pregnant and she buried the remaining of her unborn by the oak tree. I was not talking about legal buried.No, you said people bury the product of a miscarraige. Of course, people bury dead babies all the time. But they also have a birth certificate, a death certificate, a legal name on both, and a legal burial.
it is illegal to dispose of any human tissue in the way this woman claims to have done
Fetal tissue is still human tissue. It is just fetal human tissue.
There are laws concerning the disposal of human tissue. Just like a physician can't give you an amputated limb to take home and bury in your backyard because it is human tissue even though it is no longer attached. Human tissue, whether it is in the form of fetal tissue, an amputated limb, or an organ that has been removed, has to be disposed of according to the laws governing the disposal of biohazardous material. Even a needle with human blood on it must be disposed of in a manner consistent with these laws.
She was 11 weeks pregnant and she buried the remaining of her unborn by the oak tree. I was not talking about legal buried.
It's her baby and she has every right to have a private funeral.