I did. I posted it. It was an eye-witness account from one of the participants. The Boston Tea Party events happened over a few hours on the ships in the harbor, and the immediate harbor area. No one was raped or killed. No houses were burnt. No slaves were stolen.
Why are you mixing up the Boston Tea Party with other events? That's squishy history at best, and intellectual dishonesty at worst.
#1697
intellectual dishonesty...ok, whatever you prefer to think. it was a very violent time and there was violence against the settlers, slaves, patriots, loyalists, crimes were committed, rape happened, property theft and damage did indeed happen. Yet somehow in the midst of of all this, there was a very civillized affair of several men boarding a ship and throwing tea overboard, and everyone else in the city of Boston that night behaved beautifully, no one got angry or yelled or hit each other. Is that what you believe?
I don't usually operate on "well yea you know war is hell. anything can happen." I'd prefer to operate on factual and documented if I were to make a claim because I would hate to spread wrong information to people.
that's why we know for sure that something happened such as Holocaust, humanitarian crisis at Haiti refuge tent city, etc. So I didn't say you're making it up and I didn't say it's not true that it happened. I'm just asking for source to read more about it. I'm not concerned with whether or not if it happened. The question is - is it documented?
So throw me a bone. I can't find any.
I don't usually operate on "well yea you know war is hell. anything can happen." I'd prefer to operate on factual and documented if I were to make a claim.
that's why we know for sure that something happened such as Holocaust, humanitarian crisis at Haiti refuge tent city, etc. So I didn't say you're making it up and I didn't say it's not true that it happened. I'm just asking for source to read more about it.
So throw me a bone. I can't find any.
But sometimes you have to read between the lines, especially if no documentation is available. That means having a sizable general knowledge of the whole subject, and I have a feeling DeafCaroline qualifies, since she knows history.
then you might find this book an interesting read: Amazon.com: Defiance of the Patriots: The Boston Tea Party and the Making of America (9780300117059): Benjamin L. Carp: Books
[Boston Tea Party] raped British women and stole their slaves or killed them.
it would be different story if she was a historian or researcher on that subject if I were to totally rely on one's words.
this book will discuss about
?
It comes down to credibility. All in all, DeafCaroline fits the bill, although I do not swallow everything anyone says, you know? I certainly do not trust official versions of events.
I already said a few posts back that I should have clarified I was referring to the time period during which the Boston Tea Party happened. Why are you still harping on this?this book will discuss about
?
I already said a few posts back that I should have clarified I was referring to the time period during which the Boston Tea Party happened. Why are you still harping on this?
so... why bring it up? to justify OWS?
what do you think? That i'm saying OWS is ok because there was violence up to the Revolution? That would contradict with what i said earlier that I don't approve of what some of the OWS participants are doing.
So, why ask if I am attempting to use it to justify OWS? - it's a cause, a movement. It's a reaction to Wall Street. That doesn't mean I approve of how some protestors behaved.
So OWS is made up of nothing but gimme gimme gimme people who wants bailouts/jobs.
I see.