Well, who is "they" then?
People. Just people who are the victims of inexorable fate.
Sighhh...
Never mind. We know how you feel.
But hey, it's a free country.
Well, who is "they" then?
People. Just people who are the victims of inexorable fate.
Sighhh...
Never mind. We know how you feel.
But hey, it's a free country.
Do they not deserve our kindness and charity? Charity from just a voluntary few, or should there be a national policy to look after them?
The problem with a national policy is that it also gives the government the power to control whatever it doles out.Now we're getting somewhere. Do they not deserve our kindness and charity? Charity from just a voluntary few, or should there be a national policy to look after them?
I doubt you do......You have yet to clarify who you were talking about when you asked
The problem with a national policy is that it also gives the government the power to control whatever it doles out.
Whatever the Feds giveth, they can taketh away.
Shhhh, let me study their habits first.
Most rich pay for their own insurance. Most middle class have company paid private insurance as well if they are working. That may end if the government gets involved.
I know the older folks get Medicare too. Maybe that's what your speaking of?
Meh, it is pretty disingenuous to accuse me of using tactics to avoid answering a question when you are unwilling to clarify your question. I asked for clarification 4 times.
We can let it drop if you like, but let the record reflect that I tried.
You are going to have to explain to us all exactly how Obama's policies redistribute wealth, and how exactly they fulfill the criteria for being socialist. You have no idea what the answers to these questions are, as you have demonstrated time and time again. You sit back and throw around words and key phrases that you can't even explain.
Resorting to name calling? Typical of those who don't have the knowledge or the intelligence to discuss the topic.:roll:
The danger here is dehumanizing the subject.
I am talking about people.
Those who cannot afford healthcare through no fault of their own.
Ah, probably best to let it drop then.
For starters, those who have healthcare in the USA can use it anytime they so choose. They also get better care without waiting periods or being denied in most cases. Ask the Canadians why they come to America for their healthcare?
I think you have it reversed. More are going into Canada for healthcare and lower cost prescription medicines than the other way around.
The separation of church and state has nothing to do with God or religion and the government.
It most certainly does.
It only prevents the government from choosing your religion or church or faith.
And my freedom to choose my own religion means that the government will not sanction one religion above another, nor use one religion above another to make political and legal determinations. Perhaps it is you that should read a little further, and stop believing whatever it is the right and your pastor is feeding you.
Read more and you will understand that. Don't just believe what others are telling you on the left. Yes and thank God that I do have the freedom to pray to my God anytime and anywhere I want. That is on what and how this country was founded.
Again, you might want to delve into history a bit deeper.
If you are truly patriotic you do and will care about the other individuals that are living here. At least it's citizens. I'm patriotic does that mean I'm crazy or blind. Certainly not. I served my country in the Navy. I now serve as a police officer in my community. I believe in God and country, flying the flag, saluting it and singing the National Anthem. I guess that just means I love this country.
Lots of lip service. Means nothing.
I serious doubt that OWS will ever be as big as the Tea Party. They are not organized and mainly show up in small groups with no real purpose. They have affected very little change if any. The Tea Party on the other hand changed the face of the mid-term elections by ousting many iron clad seats and putting in fresh candidates. Unfortunately both parties are to blame for the mess that we're found to be in.
Well, you need to check your facts, because the movement has already outgrown the Tea Pary. They have effected very little change? They have people talking more than the Tea Party ever thought about. The first step to change to awareness and talk. OWS has accomplished that many times over. You would have to go no farther than this thread to find some accurate information, but you will need to read all of the posts and not just the right wing objections and attempts to discredit.
And as to why Steiny logs in and I log out? Gee whiz, duh, maybe it's because I live in Missouri and he is in Georgia? We don't live together or use the same computer and we don't call or text each other about when we will be online. Maybe, just maybe it is a coincidence??? Or maybe it's a conspiracy???!!!
The problem with a national policy is that it also gives the government the power to control whatever it doles out.
Whatever the Feds giveth, they can taketh away.
The danger here is dehumanizing the subject.
I am talking about people.
Those who cannot afford healthcare through no fault of their own.
And again, one has to dehumanize to deny. That is exactly what is going on.
So, you would prefer that profit driven insurance companies have that power instead? Because that is where it stands currently. Just ask anyone who has paid into their private plan for 40 years and then had their claim denied when they were diagnosed with a catastrophic illness.
Ask the woman whose insurance company denied payment for treatment for broken bones because she was a known victim of domestic violence, which they used as a "pre-existing condition" to deny coverage.
Oh, I could go on and on and on and on.
Yeah, I am jolly well aware of it.
I just cannot understand giving some cubicle-ensconsed insurance worker the power to override a doctor's professional judgement, but that's another topic.
Yeah, I am jolly well aware of it.
I just cannot understand giving some cubicle-ensconsed insurance worker the power to override a doctor's professional judgement, but that's another topic.
It's a good thing my dad is on medicare now or his insurance would drop him when he got dx'd with stage 3 cancer.
How do you know that inequities won't happen under Obamacare?So, you would prefer that profit driven insurance companies have that power instead? Because that is where it stands currently. Just ask anyone who has paid into their private plan for 40 years and then had their claim denied when they were diagnosed with a catastrophic illness.
Ask the woman whose insurance company denied payment for treatment for broken bones because she was a known victim of domestic violence, which they used as a "pre-existing condition" to deny coverage.
Oh, I could go on and on and on and on.