What the hell has that got to do with anything?:rl:
obviously you wouldn't understand.
What the hell has that got to do with anything?:rl:
That would be accepted. Excepted means left out.
Actually SHel you are missing the point. Many normally hearing kids have speech theraphy, it really isn't as big of a deal as some deaf people seem to think it is. It's something normally hearing kids end up doing to, the advantage the normally hearing kids have is they actually do hear themselves so it's easier, Lotte hears herself with her CI so she has that advantage over Angel when it comes to speech, being able to hear the sounds makes it easier to make them and understand them. But for whatever reason some of you are refusing to ackknowledge that fact. Oh well. In another 10 years the CI's will probably be excepted just a HA's are now.
obviously you wouldn't understand.
obviously you wouldn't understand.
OMG! How far are you willing to go in the name of technology when there are solutions that don't involve invasive surgical procedures? I just don't understand how anyone can justify permanent disfigurement and the pain this child went through just for the chance of a small amount of sound perception! This is downright scary!!!!!!
So much nonsense in 1 post...
- "solutions that don't involve invasive surgical procedures" .... There are none available that comes even close to CI
- "chance of a small amount of sound perception!".... It's hardly a chance, and it's a lot of sound perception.... ask any CI-user on this board..
Looking forward to see you failing to come up with some information backing up your statements...
And when you realise you're talking nonsense... don't worry, no apology is expected... you can just pretend it never happened........
So much nonsense in 1 post...
- "solutions that don't involve invasive surgical procedures" .... There are none available that comes even close to CI
- "chance of a small amount of sound perception!".... It's hardly a chance, and it's a lot of sound perception.... ask any CI-user on this board..
Looking forward to see you failing to come up with some information backing up your statements...
And when you realise you're talking nonsense... don't worry, no apology is expected... you can just pretend it never happened........
If it was child abuse, then the father of adopted would have been arrested and taken away to jail and the child become being controlled by CPS (they are the one that may support CI) *shrug*
OR even the surgeon doctor should have his license revoked and never to operate again at all.
Be perfectly honest with some of you, I haven't seen at least one cochlear implant person that had came in this thread show any sign of sympathy for this adopted child, and I don't know what else to say to this point on, It's like don't they have a heart? I have never experience those type of people before. It's very sad.
Speaking for myself, the reason why I haven't posted is because posts like these are used as currency by people who are essentially against child implantation. I have watched how the discussion in this thread has unfolded and the parent has already been labelled a "child abuser", even though none of us here know him from a bar of soap and do not have access to all the facts of the case.
I disagree with the use of sad (and rare) stories like this in such a way on principle. It's cheap.
Now there's an intelligent relpy! Can you cite your sources for that one? Hey shel....I think the troll is asleep!
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Yea, the poster is a big fat liar...how do we know that u are not lying about the statements u have made, Rick?
Shift change! The other troll is on duty now.
You don't.