jillio
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2006
- Messages
- 60,232
- Reaction score
- 19
TODs = Teachers Of the Deaf
A repeat:
And, wow! A TOD that doesn't know what a TOD is?
Oral is, by definition, no sign. TC incorporates oral and sign.
TODs = Teachers Of the Deaf
A repeat:
..And, wow! A TOD that doesn't know what a TOD is?
And, wow! A TOD that doesn't know what a TOD is?
...........
........ Learn the difference between disagreement with a statement and attempting to besmirk anothers character by making personal attacks.
Take it easy please--no point starting a possible misinterpretation of this remark. The comment itself can or could be portrayed or viewed in several ways than what was intended.
~RR
Having trouble following your own "rules"??
Interpreters sometimes do speak for the deaf person who's signing, but that all depends on the deaf individuals if they want to use their voice to ask a teacher a question, for all that means they may. I've done it during my high school years, when I raise my hand, and a teacher calls my name, I would voice my question, and the interpreter would know that she/he would not needed to voice the question for me.
If a teacher does not understand a deaf student's question the interpreter then will voice the question again for the deaf student. That's one reason why interpreters are there for the deaf, in case we need them.
When I was in public schools with no interpreters, it was more frustrated to understand the teacher by reading her lips the whole entire period, because sometimes the teacher intends to face the board and begins to talk, how can a deaf people reads the teacher's lips when her back is facing the deaf students face? (that was an oral method program)
And, wow! A TOD that doesn't know what a TOD is?
...............
That was disagreement with a statement.
Agree. Good post, Cheri.
I tried not having interpretors first semester in college - frustrating, tiring, too much time on communication and not learning, and bad grades. I can't imagine having this for years - probably I would flunk.
Really? with interpretors?
For me, it was the opposite..no stress cuz I could follow the class lectures much easily and knew what to base my term papers on.
Really? with interpretors?
For me, it was the opposite..no stress cuz I could follow the class lectures much easily and knew what to base my term papers on.
I believe that Kaitin was saying without an interpreter for her college classes she would most likely would flunk. Correct me if I'm wrong, Kaitin.
.I tried not having interpretors first semester in college - frustrating, tiring, too much time on communication and not learning, and bad grades. I can't imagine having this for years - probably I would flunk
Really? with interpretors?
For me, it was the opposite..no stress cuz I could follow the class lectures much easily and knew what to base my term papers on.
Did my first reply mean the opposite of these ^? If so, sorry!
Today 04:24 PM
Kaitin.
Kaitin
No need to apologise Kaitin.
Maybe I wrote my reply the opposite.....I mean I would flunk without interpreters because I miss things, work too hard to understand, and spend more time on communication instead of learning class information.
Did my first reply mean the opposite of these ^? If so, sorry!
EXACTLY!!!!! What Cloggy, Rick, and Jackie do not understand is that it takes a LOT of energy to "hear" and learn aurally. Most dhh kids can do it, but it takes a lot of effort, and it takes away from just "picking stuff up" type of learning.and spend more time on communication instead of learning class information.
EXACTLY!!!!! What Cloggy, Rick, and Jackie do not understand is that it takes a LOT of energy to "hear" and learn aurally. Most dhh kids can do it, but it takes a lot of effort, and it takes away from just "picking stuff up" type of learning.
A kid could do semi decently orally, but they could do EVEN better by learning VISUALLY (using Sign!)
The point of posting my post and Kaitin's post was to?
I'm sorry, I missed that..... disagreement... off course, that's what it was !