Abstinence only: interesting findings

jillio

jillio

New Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2006
Messages
60,232
Reaction score
22
Researcher Janet Rosenblaum, of Johns Hopkins, completed a rigorous study comparing teens who took a pledge of abstinence to teens with similar backgrounds and beliefs who did not take a pledge of abstinence. She found absolutely no difference in their sexual behavior, or the age at which they began having sex, or in the number of their partners. In fact, the only difference found (aside from aparent memory loss experienced by the pledge taking group :giggle:) was that those who took a pledge of abstinence were significantly less likely to use any form of birth control when they did engage in sex. The lesson many students took away from their "abstinence only" education was a negative and innaccurate view of contraception.

Here is the point of this: "virginity pledges" are the one of the ways the government measures whether abstinence only education is working. They count these pledges as "proof" that teens will abstain from sex until marraige. According to the results of this study, and the rates of unmarried, teen preganancy, that is like using a New Year's Resolution to diet as proof that you lost 75 pounds.

Over the last 8 years, we have spent a total of $1.5 billion in federal funds on these abstinence only programs. As stated by Rosenblaum, "Abstinence only education is required to give innacurrate information." There is an archive of literature supporting the fact that abstinence only does not work. When are we going to start putting funds towards programs that do?
 
I agree, teaching abstinence only
Means they have no use for contraception. So when their hormones starts to act up and memory loss of their pledge takes place.

They are totally unprepared. Leading to more STDs and unwanted pregnancy.

Teaching contraception and prevention. Along with abstinence. Is what needs to be taught.
 
jillio said:
Researcher Janet Rosenblaum, of Johns Hopkins, completed a rigorous study comparing teens who took a pledge of abstinence to teens with similar backgrounds and beliefs who did not take a pledge of abstinence. She found absolutely no difference in their sexual behavior, or the age at which they began having sex, or in the number of their partners. In fact, the only difference found (aside from aparent memory loss experienced by the pledge taking group :giggle:) was that those who took a pledge of abstinence were significantly less likely to use any form of birth control when they did engage in sex. The lesson many students took away from their "abstinence only" education was a negative and innaccurate view of contraception.

Here is the point of this: "virginity pledges" are the one of the ways the government measures whether abstinence only education is working. They count these pledges as "proof" that teens will abstain from sex until marraige. According to the results of this study, and the rates of unmarried, teen preganancy, that is like using a New Year's Resolution to diet as proof that you lost 75 pounds.

Over the last 8 years, we have spent a total of $1.5 billion in federal funds on these abstinence only programs. As stated by Rosenblaum, "Abstinence only education is required to give innacurrate information." There is an archive of literature supporting the fact that abstinence only does not work. When are we going to start putting funds towards programs that do?
Click to expand...

I saw this discussed on television a few days ago, and I agree it is full of irony. On a similar note, when someone's unemployment benefits run out, the government considers it proof that the person is back on the workforce. Madness.
 
If I were a parent, I'd rather have my children remain virgins forever but I haven't forgotten what it was like to be a teenager so I'm not for abstaince only.
 
deafskeptic said:
If I were a parent, I'd rather have my children remain virgins forever but I haven't forgotten what it was like to be a teenager so I'm not for abstaince only.
Click to expand...

I hope my kids aren't virgins forever. :shock: I wouldn't wish that on anyone. ;) :giggle:
 
So people who preach abstinence only are against birth control or think that by teaching teenagers about birth control will encourage them to have sex?
 
Memory loss? Ha! I don't lost so many memory at all. =/

That explains why non-virgins feel sorry for those virgins and think they should have a sex. Even they mock them for their virginity. :roll: Whatever. =/

Gosh, I hate it when they try to encourage me to have it and insist me that sex is so heathy and virginity don't. Ugh... :roll:
 
I don't see what so many people see in abstinence only education in the bible belt. Teens are going to have sex whether or not Granny Smith in sex ed 101 tells you you're going to hell and you'll end up pregnant and get the clap so many times it turns into applause if you do it before you're married. Abstinence only does nothing but denies teens information that they desperately need to know about from the only reliable and largely apathetic system, public ed.
 
Mockingbird said:
I don't see what so many people see in abstinence only education in the bible belt. Teens are going to have sex whether or not Granny Smith in sex ed 101 tells you you're going to hell and you'll end up pregnant and get the clap so many times it turns into applause if you do it before you're married. Abstinence only does nothing but denies teens information that they desperately need to know about from the only reliable and largely apathetic system, public ed.
Click to expand...

:gpost:
 
Mockingbird said:
I don't see what so many people see in abstinence only education in the bible belt. Teens are going to have sex whether or not Granny Smith in sex ed 101 tells you you're going to hell and you'll end up pregnant and get the clap so many times it turns into applause if you do it before you're married. Abstinence only does nothing but denies teens information that they desperately need to know about from the only reliable and largely apathetic system, public ed.
Click to expand...

When I was 16, my dad told me that if I have premarital sex, I would go to hell. When I had my first sexual experience at 23, my first thought was, "Wow. That would have been worth going to hell for."

I've known for many years; kids will have sex no matter what parents think about it. Its part of life. In my opinion, its best to teach them how to properly use birth control, but to hold out just a little longer for that special someone.
 
David said:
When I was 16, my dad told me that if I have premarital sex, I would go to hell. When I had my first sexual experience at 23, my first thought was, "Wow. That would have been worth going to hell for."
I've known for many years; kids will have sex no matter what parents think about it. Its part of life. In my opinion, its best to teach them how to properly use birth control, but to hold out just a little longer for that special someone.
Click to expand...

:laugh2:
 
David said:
When I was 16, my dad told me that if I have premarital sex, I would go to hell. When I had my first sexual experience at 23, my first thought was, "Wow. That would have been worth going to hell for."

I've known for many years; kids will have sex no matter what parents think about it. Its part of life. In my opinion, its best to teach them how to properly use birth control, but to hold out just a little longer for that special someone.
Click to expand...

Yea, I committed so many sins having sex but hey, life is short and sex is FUN!

I agree with you about teaching the kids how to use BC and to try to encourage them to hold out a little longer because having sex for the first time with someone special is probably something wonderful. It didnt happen for me as my first time was a drunken one night stand with one of my classmates. It really sucked and I wish I didnt go for it. Oh well...
 
Sounds like that 1.5 billion bucks coulda went to something more worthwhile.
 
I think its time parents and the conservative right stop opposing sex and health curriculums at schools as they are falsely viewed as porn education. The facts need to be heard and straightened out by health professionals, and throw out the stork and friend's irresponsible ideas about sexuality.
 
KarissaMann05 said:
Memory loss? Ha! I don't lost so many memory at all. =/

That explains why non-virgins feel sorry for those virgins and think they should have a sex. Even they mock them for their virginity. :roll: Whatever. =/

Gosh, I hate it when they try to encourage me to have it and insist me that sex is so heathy and virginity don't. Ugh... :roll:
Click to expand...

I hope you don't think I was mocking, it really was just a joke. I would never try to make any claims about how "healthy" virginity vs. sexual activity is, there are just too many factors. I do think that abstinence only education is an awful idea. It almost never works, and usually just creates misconceptions and misunderstandings about sex and the issues surrounding it. If someone is actually educated about the topic and chooses not to have sex, then more power to them. I have plenty of friends that are virgins for a bunch of different reasons, and as far as I'm concerned, that's up to them.

I do have to say, though, I would never tell anyone (my friends, my children, etc...) that they should be virgins when they are married. There's a whole bunch of reasons that I disagree with that idea.
 
lsfoster said:
I hope you don't think I was mocking, it really was just a joke. I would never try to make any claims about how "healthy" virginity vs. sexual activity is, there are just too many factors. I do think that abstinence only education is an awful idea. It almost never works, and usually just creates misconceptions and misunderstandings about sex and the issues surrounding it. If someone is actually educated about the topic and chooses not to have sex, then more power to them. I have plenty of friends that are virgins for a bunch of different reasons, and as far as I'm concerned, that's up to them.

I do have to say, though, I would never tell anyone (my friends, my children, etc...) that they should be virgins when they are married. There's a whole bunch of reasons that I disagree with that idea.
Click to expand...

I just posted generally it, so I was not talked to only you. :)
 
David said:
When I was 16, my dad told me that if I have premarital sex, I would go to hell. When I had my first sexual experience at 23, my first thought was, "Wow. That would have been worth going to hell for."

I've known for many years; kids will have sex no matter what parents think about it. Its part of life. In my opinion, its best to teach them how to properly use birth control, but to hold out just a little longer for that special someone.
Click to expand...

:laugh2:

And well said!
 
Back
Top