Cloggy
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2005
- Messages
- 4,703
- Reaction score
- 0
There's a difference between "falling down" and "collapse upon itself".3 did fell down.. WTC-1, WTC-2 and WTC-3 (hotel) yes third one did fell down. it is not BIG like WTC but smaller one. It was on the news. I watched the third building fell down.. i was like aww.. it was on fire as well. I am sure there are more building cuz 16 acres?? obivously HUGE more than buildings have fell down and and not to forget underground stores and all that ?? so many have caught on fire and fell down..
Do you realise that before 911 not one building build like the WTC has collapsed due to fire? Not 1. And there were some that burned longer than WTC.
WTC-7 had only small fires. There was no inferno. The owner of the building says in an interview that they decided to "pull it" a term used in demolition to destroy a building on it's own footprint by using explosived.
They "pulled" WTC-7. Have you ever seen a documentary on buildings being demolished. Months of preparation in order to do that... And on 9/11 they did it in 1 hour!!!!
This was prepared...
Do a little test. Create a building from stone and wood, and then make it collapse. See how it falls. See how long it takes.....
If heat would have weakened the steel, it would have bend and the tower would have fallen to 1 side. The remaining tower below the impact zone would have been OK and would stay...
HOW COULD IT HAVE COLLAPSED!!