- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 45,078
- Reaction score
- 323
I heard of a statistic (anyone please confirm or deny) but have not seen the source. I was told that only 20% of the parents of deaf children actuall learn to sign. Sure it's difficult but how could you not want to communicate with your child. Perhaps there are parents out there that decide on CI's so that they don't have to take the time to learn sign language. If true, I think that is sad. For me, learning to sign would be of minimal consideration for the critera of deciding on a CI. That would be a totally selfish reason.
At my school where I work at, we have children who are language delayed because during their first 5 years, they didnt get full access to a language due to their parents' refusal to sign. In the home, the hearing child"s language development grows from hearing the words and sentences being spoken by their parents. For a deaf child who doesnt have the same access to spoken language at home, that puts him/her at a disadvantage. Then when they start school at 5 years old, their language development tend to be the age of 1 to 2 years old. No wonder people in the past labeled deaf people as retarded. It just angers me knowing that some of my students go home and miss out all the language they should be getting. 6 hours of language at the school is not enough. Imagine trying to learn ASL at the age of 5 and then having to tackle on the complexities of the English language in written form at the same time without a strong language foundation?